StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Backpack vs Laravel Voyager

Backpack vs Laravel Voyager

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backpack
Backpack
Stacks14
Followers67
Votes14
Laravel Voyager
Laravel Voyager
Stacks39
Followers155
Votes4

Backpack vs Laravel Voyager: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between Backpack and Laravel Voyager, which are two popular admin panel packages for Laravel. These packages provide a ready-made solution for creating and managing the admin interfaces of Laravel applications.

  1. Installation and Setup: The installation and setup process for Backpack and Laravel Voyager differs. Backpack requires manual installation of the package and its dependencies, whereas Laravel Voyager provides a quick installation process using a single command. This makes Laravel Voyager a more convenient option for developers who want to get started quickly.

  2. Customizability: Both Backpack and Laravel Voyager offer customization options, but Backpack provides more flexibility in this regard. With Backpack, developers have more control over the appearance and functionality of the admin panel, allowing them to tailor it to their specific project requirements. Laravel Voyager, on the other hand, provides a more standardized and opinionated approach to admin panel customization.

  3. Community and Documentation: Backpack has a strong and active community with a comprehensive documentation that covers various aspects of the package. Additionally, Backpack provides a vast collection of community-driven extensions and add-ons that can be used to further extend the admin panel's functionality. Laravel Voyager also has a supportive community, but its documentation may not be as extensive as Backpack's, and the availability of community extensions is relatively limited.

  4. User Interface Design: The user interface design of Backpack and Laravel Voyager differs in terms of aesthetics and usability. Backpack offers a clean and minimalistic interface design that focuses on functionality and ease of use. Laravel Voyager, on the other hand, provides a more visually appealing design with a modern touch. The choice between the two depends on the specific design preferences of the developer and the intended audience of the application.

  5. Feature Set: Both Backpack and Laravel Voyager offer a wide range of features that are essential for building an admin panel. Backpack provides a comprehensive set of features out-of-the-box, including CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations, file uploads, and authentication. Laravel Voyager, on the other hand, offers a similar set of features but with some additional functionalities, such as media management and menu builder. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project.

  6. Maintenance and Support: Both Backpack and Laravel Voyager are actively maintained by their respective developers. However, Laravel Voyager has the advantage of being an official Laravel package, which means it receives regular updates and bug fixes from the Laravel team. This can provide developers with a sense of reliability and assurance when it comes to long-term maintenance and support.

In summary, Backpack and Laravel Voyager are both powerful admin panel packages for Laravel, but they have some key differences in terms of installation process, customizability, community support, user interface design, feature set, and maintenance. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the developer and the project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Backpack
Backpack
Laravel Voyager
Laravel Voyager

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

It is a Laravel Admin Package that includes BREAD(CRUD) operations, a media manager, menu builder, and much more.It is a Feature packed and versatile Laravel control panel. It provides an elegant UI for controlling various features across a Laravel web application.

-
Control panel; Media manager; Menu builder; Database manager; CRUD; Roles and permissions
Statistics
Stacks
14
Stacks
39
Followers
67
Followers
155
Votes
14
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Great docs
  • 4
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Zero-config
Pros
  • 2
    Database management
  • 2
    Out-of-the box users/roles/permissions
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
ES6
ES6
JavaScript
JavaScript
Webpack
Webpack
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to Backpack, Laravel Voyager?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

PrimeNg

PrimeNg

It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.

Structor

Structor

Structor is a visual development environment for node.js Web applications with React UI. The essential part of the builder is a project boilerplate. The boilerplate is a prepacked source code of node.js application in which metainfo included.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot