Chromeless vs Serverless Chrome

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Chromeless

13
29
+ 1
0
Serverless Chrome

8
25
+ 1
0
Add tool

Chromeless vs Serverless Chrome: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference: Execution Context - One main difference between Chromeless and Serverless Chrome is the execution context they provide. Chromeless runs within Node.js, allowing you to write code using JavaScript and execute it on a server, while Serverless Chrome provides a headless Chrome browser environment that operates completely independently of Node.js. This means that Chromeless is tightly integrated with Node.js and can leverage its capabilities, while Serverless Chrome offers a stand-alone browser environment.
  2. Key Difference: Setup and Deployment - Another important difference is the setup and deployment process. With Chromeless, you need to install the library as a dependency and then configure it according to your requirements. On the other hand, Serverless Chrome provides Docker images that can be easily deployed and run on various platforms, making it more straightforward and convenient for deployment purposes.
  3. Key Difference: API and Functionality - Chromeless primarily focuses on providing a simple and streamlined API for controlling the headless Chrome browser. It abstracts away the complexities of interacting with the browser and offers a high-level API for tasks like navigating web pages, taking screenshots, and interacting with elements. Serverless Chrome, however, offers a more extensive range of functionalities, as it provides access to the entire Chrome DevTools Protocol, enabling you to perform advanced debugging, network tracing, and performance profiling.
  4. Key Difference: Customization - When it comes to customization, Chromeless offers a more limited scope compared to Serverless Chrome. Chromeless provides a set of predefined actions or commands that you can use to control the browser, but it may not cover all possible scenarios or use cases. Serverless Chrome, on the other hand, gives you full control over the headless browser environment, allowing you to customize and extend its functionality as per your specific requirements.
  5. Key Difference: Community and Support - Chromeless has a relatively smaller community compared to Serverless Chrome, which means you may find fewer resources, examples, and community support available for troubleshooting or getting help with any issues you might face. Serverless Chrome, being a more well-established and widely adopted project, has a larger community, making it easier to find assistance and receive prompt support.
  6. Key Difference: Dependency Management - Chromeless is designed to work within the Node.js ecosystem, which means it's typically used alongside other Node.js modules and libraries. As a result, Chromeless benefits from the dependency management capabilities provided by Node's package manager, npm. Serverless Chrome, however, operates as a stand-alone browser environment and doesn't rely on Node.js modules or npm for managing dependencies, offering a slightly different approach to handling dependencies.

In Summary, Chromeless is tightly integrated with Node.js and provides a simpler API, while Serverless Chrome offers a more extensive range of functionalities and easier deployment, but with a larger community and less customization options.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Chromeless?

Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda.

What is Serverless Chrome?

The aim of this project is to provide the scaffolding for using Headless Chrome during a serverless function invocation. Serverless Chrome takes care of building and bundling the Chrome binaries and making sure Chrome is running when your serverless function executes. In addition, this project also provides a few "example" handlers for common patterns (e.g. taking a screenshot of a page, printing to PDF, some scraping, etc.)

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Chromeless and Serverless Chrome as a desired skillset
What companies use Chromeless?
What companies use Serverless Chrome?
    No companies found
    See which teams inside your own company are using Chromeless or Serverless Chrome.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Chromeless?
    What tools integrate with Serverless Chrome?
    What are some alternatives to Chromeless and Serverless Chrome?
    PhantomJS
    PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    Puppeteer
    Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Git
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    See all alternatives