StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Devise vs OmniAuth

Devise vs OmniAuth

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
OmniAuth
OmniAuth
Stacks312
Followers150
Votes9

Devise vs OmniAuth: What are the differences?

Introduction: Devise and OmniAuth are both popular authentication frameworks used in web development. While both serve the purpose of authenticating users, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Integration with Multiple Providers: Devise primarily focuses on authentication and is designed to work with a single authentication provider such as a database. In contrast, OmniAuth is specifically designed to integrate with multiple authentication providers, such as Facebook, Twitter, or Google. OmniAuth acts as a middleware layer between the application and the authentication providers, allowing users to authenticate using various services.

  2. Ease of Implementation: Devise provides a comprehensive set of features out-of-the-box for user authentication, including handling password resets, confirmation emails, and session management. On the other hand, OmniAuth is a lightweight library that simplifies the process of integrating with external providers, but it requires additional configuration and setup to handle user registration and session management.

  3. User Database: Devise stores user information in a local database, allowing developers to have full control over the user data and authentication process. OmniAuth, on the other hand, relies on the authentication provider to store and manage user information. This means that user data is stored externally, and developers need to rely on the provider's API to access and manage user data.

  4. Flexibility: Devise offers a high degree of customization, allowing developers to tailor the authentication process to their specific needs. Developers have control over the authentication flow, can implement custom validations, and can customize the views and templates used for user registration, login, and account management. In comparison, OmniAuth focuses more on providing a standardized API for integrating with external providers, offering less flexibility in terms of customization.

  5. Resource Efficiency: Devise is a self-contained authentication framework that handles user authentication within the application, making it resource-efficient with regards to external calls and network requests. OmniAuth, on the other hand, relies on making API calls to external authentication providers, which can introduce additional overhead and potential latency.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: Devise has a large and active community with extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find resources and get support when needed. OmniAuth, while also having community support, may have less extensive documentation and resources available due to its narrower focus on integration with external providers.

In summary, Devise is a comprehensive authentication framework that provides extensive features and customization options for user authentication within an application, while OmniAuth is a lightweight library specifically designed for integrating with multiple external authentication providers. Devise offers greater control over user data and implementation flexibility, while OmniAuth simplifies the integration process with third-party providers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Devise
Devise
OmniAuth
OmniAuth

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
Multi-provider authentication;Over 200 supported authentication providers (see list at https://github.com/intridea/omniauth/wiki/List-of-Strategies);Open source
Statistics
Stacks
535
Stacks
312
Followers
232
Followers
150
Votes
56
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
Pros
  • 6
    Easy Social Login
  • 3
    Free
Integrations
Rails
Rails
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Devise, OmniAuth?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope