Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Rancher: What are the differences?
Docker and Rancher are used to manage container-based applications. While Docker is a containerization platform, Rancher is a container management platform that provides additional features and capabilities. Let's explore the key differences between the two:
Containerization Platform: Docker is primarily a containerization platform that allows users to create, deploy, and run containers. It enables developers to package applications and their dependencies into portable and lightweight containers, ensuring consistency across different environments. In contrast, Rancher is a container management platform that offers a higher level of abstraction by providing a user-friendly interface and additional management features on top of Docker.
Container Orchestration: Docker provides basic container orchestration capabilities through its Docker Swarm mode. Swarm enables users to create and manage a cluster of Docker nodes, allowing for container deployment, scaling, and load balancing. Rancher, on the other hand, integrates with Kubernetes and provides advanced container orchestration features, making it easier to manage and scale containerized applications in production environments.
User Interface and Management: Docker provides a command-line interface (CLI) for managing containers, images, and other Docker components. While the CLI is powerful, it requires users to have a good understanding of Docker commands. Rancher, on the other hand, offers a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies container management tasks. The Rancher GUI provides a visual representation of clusters, nodes, and services, making it easier for users to monitor and manage their containerized applications. Rancher also offers additional management features like resource allocation, access control, and application catalog.
Multi-Cluster Management: Docker primarily focuses on managing containers within a single Docker Swarm cluster. Although it is possible to set up multiple Swarm clusters, managing and coordinating multiple clusters can be challenging. Rancher, on the other hand, specializes in multi-cluster management. It allows users to manage and deploy containers across multiple clusters, providing a unified view and control over the entire container infrastructure. This is particularly useful in scenarios where applications span across multiple environments or regions.
Extensibility and Integration: Docker has a vast ecosystem of tools, libraries, and third-party integrations that extend its capabilities. Users can leverage Docker Compose for defining multi-container applications, Docker Registry for managing container images, and Docker Hub for sharing and discovering container images. Rancher integrates with Docker and Kubernetes, enabling users to leverage the functionalities of these platforms. Rancher also provides a catalog of pre-configured application templates, making it easier to deploy popular applications with a few clicks.
In summary, Docker is a containerization platform that allows users to create and run containers, while Rancher is a container management platform that provides additional management features on top of Docker. Docker focuses on containerization and provides basic container orchestration, while Rancher offers advanced container orchestration capabilities through integration with Kubernetes. Rancher provides a user-friendly GUI, multi-cluster management, and additional management features, making it a suitable choice for complex containerized applications in production environments.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Rancher
- Easy to use103
- Open source and totally free79
- Multi-host docker-compose support63
- Load balancing and health check included58
- Simple58
- Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature44
- Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box42
- Only requires docker37
- Multitenant and permission management34
- Easy to use and feature rich29
- Cross cloud compatible11
- Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure11
- Simple and powerful8
- Next-gen platform8
- Very Docker-friendly7
- Support Kubernetes and Swarm6
- Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)6
- Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes6
- Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments6
- High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/76
- Easy to use service catalog5
- Very intuitive UI4
- IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud4
- Awesome support4
- Scalable3
- Requires less infrastructure requirements2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of Rancher
- Hosting Rancher can be complicated10