DokuWiki vs XWiki

Overview

DokuWiki

Stacks72

Followers99

Votes0

XWiki

Stacks18

Followers30

Votes0

DokuWiki vs XWiki: What are the differences?

Introduction: DokuWiki and XWiki are both popular wiki software tools used for collaboration and document management within organizations. While they share similarities in terms of their core function, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

User Interface and User Experience: One of the major differences between DokuWiki and XWiki is the user interface and user experience they offer. DokuWiki has a simple and lightweight interface, making it easy to use for both beginners and advanced users. On the other hand, XWiki provides a more feature-rich interface with a wide range of customization options, making it suitable for complex content management needs.
Extensions and Plugins: Another significant difference between DokuWiki and XWiki lies in the availability of extensions and plugins. DokuWiki has a limited number of plugins available, which can be beneficial for organizations that prefer a minimalistic approach. XWiki, on the other hand, provides a wide range of extensions and plugins, allowing users to customize and enhance the functionality of their wiki according to their specific requirements.
Collaboration and Workflow: DokuWiki and XWiki also differ in terms of their collaboration and workflow capabilities. DokuWiki focuses on simplicity and offers basic collaborative features, such as revision control and page locking. XWiki, on the other hand, provides advanced collaboration features like task management, permission control, and workflow automation, making it suitable for larger teams and organizations with complex collaboration needs.
Storage and Scalability: When it comes to storage and scalability, DokuWiki and XWiki have different approaches. DokuWiki stores all its data in text files, which makes it easier to manage and backup, but may limit scalability for larger organizations with extensive data. XWiki, on the other hand, stores data in a database, providing better scalability and allowing for efficient management of large amounts of content.
Supported Technologies and Integration: DokuWiki and XWiki also differ in terms of the technologies they support and the integration options available. DokuWiki is primarily built using PHP and offers limited integration capabilities with other systems. XWiki, on the other hand, is built using Java and offers extensive integration options, including support for REST APIs, LDAP, and the ability to integrate with other enterprise systems.
Customization and Theming: Lastly, DokuWiki and XWiki differ in terms of customization and theming options. DokuWiki allows users to customize the look and feel of their wiki using CSS and template modification. XWiki provides a more comprehensive theming system, allowing users to customize the entire user interface, create custom layouts, and apply different themes according to their branding and design requirements.

In summary, DokuWiki offers a simple and lightweight wiki solution with limited customization and collaboration features, making it suitable for smaller organizations with basic needs. XWiki, on the other hand, provides a more feature-rich and customizable wiki platform with advanced collaboration capabilities, making it suitable for larger organizations with complex content management requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on DokuWiki, XWiki

Michael

Software Engineer

May 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Confluence

Google Docs

Hello community, I am looking for a self-hosted online document management solution. One that covers all my needs is Confluence but it is currently not affordable for my team. Key requirements are RTL support, WYSIWYG Editing (Word-like interface as much as possible), Concurrent Editing (the best experience I have with Google Docs where I can even see who else is currently editing a document) with conflict resolution, versioning (view history and switch between versions), PDF and Word export, complex tables, and some others, full list here in column "A". I found XWIKI covering all my requirements (including those "bonus features" that I didn't list here) except one - RTL. Here a hack is suggested to address this issues but I would prefer not to go with any hacks. I myself am ready to contribute to an open source development but other people who (hopefully) will use this tool are not software engineers and this fact must be kept in mind... Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!

62.1k views62.1k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

DokuWiki	XWiki
It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.	It is a free wiki software platform written in Java with a design emphasis on extensibility. It is an enterprise wiki. It includes WYSIWYG editing, OpenDocument based document import/export, semantic annotations and tagging, and advanced permissions management.
-	Wiki; Extensions; Programming; Internationalization; Scalable; Clustering; Database; Performance; Office import; Scripting; Polyglot; Annotations; Sstructured data
Statistics
Stacks 72	Stacks 18
Followers 99	Followers 30
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub Slack Zapier JSFiddle Figma G Suite CodePen

What are some alternatives to DokuWiki, XWiki?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

DokuWiki vs XWiki: What are the differences?

User Interface and User Experience: One of the major differences between DokuWiki and XWiki is the user interface and user experience they offer. DokuWiki has a simple and lightweight interface, making it easy to use for both beginners and advanced users. On the other hand, XWiki provides a more feature-rich interface with a wide range of customization options, making it suitable for complex content management needs.
Extensions and Plugins: Another significant difference between DokuWiki and XWiki lies in the availability of extensions and plugins. DokuWiki has a limited number of plugins available, which can be beneficial for organizations that prefer a minimalistic approach. XWiki, on the other hand, provides a wide range of extensions and plugins, allowing users to customize and enhance the functionality of their wiki according to their specific requirements.
Collaboration and Workflow: DokuWiki and XWiki also differ in terms of their collaboration and workflow capabilities. DokuWiki focuses on simplicity and offers basic collaborative features, such as revision control and page locking. XWiki, on the other hand, provides advanced collaboration features like task management, permission control, and workflow automation, making it suitable for larger teams and organizations with complex collaboration needs.
Storage and Scalability: When it comes to storage and scalability, DokuWiki and XWiki have different approaches. DokuWiki stores all its data in text files, which makes it easier to manage and backup, but may limit scalability for larger organizations with extensive data. XWiki, on the other hand, stores data in a database, providing better scalability and allowing for efficient management of large amounts of content.
Supported Technologies and Integration: DokuWiki and XWiki also differ in terms of the technologies they support and the integration options available. DokuWiki is primarily built using PHP and offers limited integration capabilities with other systems. XWiki, on the other hand, is built using Java and offers extensive integration options, including support for REST APIs, LDAP, and the ability to integrate with other enterprise systems.
Customization and Theming: Lastly, DokuWiki and XWiki differ in terms of customization and theming options. DokuWiki allows users to customize the look and feel of their wiki using CSS and template modification. XWiki provides a more comprehensive theming system, allowing users to customize the entire user interface, create custom layouts, and apply different themes according to their branding and design requirements.

DokuWiki vs XWiki

Overview