StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Inferno vs Svelte

Inferno vs Svelte

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Inferno
Inferno
Stacks25
Followers64
Votes20
Svelte
Svelte
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.6K
Votes502
GitHub Stars84.6K
Forks4.7K

Inferno vs Svelte: What are the differences?

Introduction

Inferno and Svelte are two popular JavaScript frameworks used for building web applications. While both frameworks have their similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Performance: Inferno is known for its lightning-fast virtual DOM rendering speed, making it one of the fastest frameworks available. It achieves this by prioritizing minimalism and efficiency. On the other hand, Svelte takes a different approach by compiling the application at build time, resulting in smaller bundle sizes and faster initial load times.

  2. Bundle Size: Inferno focuses on keeping the bundle size as small as possible, making it ideal for applications where size is a significant concern. It achieves this by removing unused code and features through aggressive optimization techniques. Svelte, on the other hand, leverages its compiler to generate highly optimized, minimal bundles, resulting in smaller overall application sizes.

  3. Reactivity: Svelte's reactive system enables automatic DOM updates by tracking and updating only the parts of the DOM that are affected by data changes. This approach allows for efficient re-rendering and avoids unnecessary updates, resulting in better performance. In contrast, Inferno's virtual DOM diffing algorithm compares two virtual DOM trees to compute the changes needed to update the actual DOM. While this approach is still efficient, it may result in more work being done compared to Svelte's reactive system.

  4. Syntax and Transition: Inferno aims to closely mimic the syntax and APIs of React, making it easier for React developers to adopt. It provides a smooth transition path for React applications, allowing developers to leverage their existing knowledge and codebase. Svelte, on the other hand, introduces a new syntax and a different way of thinking about building applications, which might require some initial learning and adaptation for developers.

  5. Build-time vs Runtime: Svelte is a build-time compiler, which means the code is transformed and optimized during the build process. This approach allows for more extensive optimizations, resulting in faster initial load times and improved performance. Inferno, on the other hand, is a runtime library that leverages reactive programming techniques and virtual DOM diffing. This approach provides flexibility but may result in a slightly slower initial load time compared to Svelte.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Both Inferno and Svelte have active communities and ecosystems, but they differ in terms of size and maturity. React, the framework behind Inferno, has a larger community and a more extensive ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, tools, and resources available. Svelte's community is growing rapidly, and while it may not have the same level of maturity as React, it has a dedicated and passionate community that is actively contributing to its growth.

In summary, Inferno and Svelte differ in terms of performance, bundle size optimization strategies, reactivity approaches, syntax and transition paths, build-time vs runtime compilation, and community and ecosystem maturity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Inferno, Svelte

Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Raj
Raj

Oct 10, 2020

Review

It purely depends on your app needs. Does it need to be scalable, do you have lots of features, OR it is a simple project with very simple needs - many of those parameters clarify which technologies will fit.

If you are looking for a quick solution, that reduces lot of development time, take a look at postgraphile (https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/). You have to just define the schema and you get the entire graph-ql apis built for you and you can just focus on your frontend.

On frontend, React is good, but also need to remember that it is popular because it introduced one way data writes and in-built virtual dom + diffing to determine which dom to modify. Though personally I liked it, am recently more inclined to Svelte because its lightweightedness and absence of virtual dom and its simplicity compared to the huge ecosystem that React has surrounded itself with.

In all situations, frameworks keep changing over time. What is best today is not considered even good few years from now. What is important is to have the logic in a separate, clean manner void of too many framework related dependencies - that way you can switch one framework with another very easily.

3.77k views3.77k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Full-stack software engineer

Apr 25, 2020

Decided

Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.

It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.

This is going to be used with the application.

for old/ lite devices . ie.

  • android tv,
  • micro linux,
  • possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer
  • android go devices
  • android One devices
125k views125k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Inferno
Inferno
Svelte
Svelte

Inferno is an isomorphic library for building high-performance user interfaces, which is crucial when targeting mobile devices. Unlike typical virtual DOM libraries like React, Mithril, Virtual-dom, Snabbdom and Om, Inferno uses techniques to separate static and dynamic content. This allows Inferno to only "diff" renders that have dynamic values.

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

One of the fastest front-end frameworks for rendering UI in the DOM;Components have a similar API to React ES2015 components with inferno-component;Stateless components are fully supported and have more usability thanks to Inferno's hooks system;Isomorphic/universal for easy server-side rendering with inferno-server
Write less code; No virtual DOM; Truly reactive
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
84.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
25
Stacks
1.8K
Followers
64
Followers
1.6K
Votes
20
Votes
502
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    React-like api
  • 4
    Faster than React
  • 3
    Faster than Angular
  • 3
    Faster than Vue
  • 3
    Compatibility package for existing React apps
Pros
  • 59
    Performance
  • 41
    Reactivity
  • 36
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
Cons
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Little to no libraries
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Hard to learn
  • 2
    Complex

What are some alternatives to Inferno, Svelte?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase