StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Caching
  4. Web Cache
  5. Squid vs section.io

Squid vs section.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Squid
Squid
Stacks101
Followers205
Votes17
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks594
Section
Section
Stacks52
Followers63
Votes63

Squid vs section.io: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Squid and section.io, it is important to understand the key differences between these two solutions in order to make an informed decision for your website's performance optimization needs.

  1. Open Source vs. Managed Solution: Squid is an open-source caching proxy that requires manual configuration and management, while section.io provides a managed solution with a user-friendly interface for easier setup and maintenance.

  2. Scalability: Squid may require additional resources and expertise to scale effectively, whereas section.io offers seamless scalability and load balancing features to handle increasing website traffic without manual intervention.

  3. Support and Maintenance: With Squid, users are responsible for troubleshooting and maintaining the proxy server, whereas section.io provides dedicated support, updates, and monitoring to ensure optimal performance and uptime.

  4. Security Features: While Squid does offer some security features, section.io provides additional security measures such as DDoS protection, SSL termination, and Web Application Firewall (WAF) capabilities to safeguard websites from cyber threats.

  5. Integration with CDN: Squid can be integrated with a CDN for content delivery, but section.io offers a built-in CDN as part of its solution, streamlining the process and potentially improving website performance further.

  6. Cost Structure: Squid is typically free to use as an open-source tool, but users may incur costs for additional resources and support, whereas section.io operates on a subscription-based model with pricing tiers based on the level of features and support required.

In summary, Squid is a flexible open-source caching proxy, while section.io offers a managed solution with scalability, support, security features, seamless integration with CDN, and a structured cost model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Squid
Squid
Section
Section

Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge.

-
Varnish Cache; Nginx/Lua; SiteSpect; Cloudinary; Kraken; ModSecurity; Signal Sciences; ThreatX; ShieldSquare; PageSpeed; Virtual Waiting Room; Node JS; Real Time Metrics; Log Management; Real User Monitoring; Instant Global Deployments; Developer PoP; Instant Cache Purge; Managed SSL Certificates; Dynamic Content Caching; Static Asset Caching; HTML Streaming; Anonymous Page Caching; Image Optimization; Front-End Optimization; Mobile Optimization; Virtual Waiting Room; HTTP/2; Web Application Firewall; IP Blocking; SSL Certificates; DDoS Mitigation; Bad Bot Management; Load Balancing; Maintenance Pages; Anycast DNS Hosting
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
594
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
101
Stacks
52
Followers
205
Followers
63
Votes
17
Votes
63
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to config
  • 2
    Very Fast
  • 2
    Cluster
  • 2
    Web application accelerator
  • 1
    High-performance
Pros
  • 10
    Realtime stats
  • 10
    Makes the hard parts of varnish easy
  • 8
    No more hair pulling configuring caching
  • 8
    Git support
  • 7
    Easy setup
Integrations
No integrations available
Kibana
Kibana
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
SourceTree
SourceTree
ProgrammableWeb
ProgrammableWeb
Graphite
Graphite
Varnish
Varnish

What are some alternatives to Squid, Section?

Varnish

Varnish

Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

Nuster

Nuster

nuster is a high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy.

Apache Traffic Server

Apache Traffic Server

It is a fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0 compliant caching proxy server.Improve your response time, while reducing server load and bandwidth needs by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages, images, and web ser

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana