Alternatives to Avalonia logo

Alternatives to Avalonia

Xamarin Forms, Xamarin, Electron, JavaFX, and uno are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Avalonia.
23
99
+ 1
0

What is Avalonia and what are its top alternatives?

Avalonia is a multi-platform windowing toolkit - somewhat like WPF - that is intended to be multi- platform. It supports XAML, lookless controls and a flexible styling system, and runs on Windows using Direct2D and other operating systems using Gtk & Cairo.
Avalonia is a tool in the Front-End Frameworks category of a tech stack.
Avalonia is an open source tool with 20.6K GitHub stars and 1.7K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Avalonia's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Avalonia

  • Xamarin Forms
    Xamarin Forms

    A mobile application framework for building user interfaces.It easily create native user interface layouts that can be shared across Android, iOS, and Windows Phone. ...

  • Xamarin
    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

  • Electron
    Electron

    With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor. ...

  • JavaFX
    JavaFX

    It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms. ...

  • uno
    uno

    We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout. ...

  • Qt
    Qt

    Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets. ...

  • Flutter
    Flutter

    Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android. ...

  • Bootstrap
    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

Avalonia alternatives & related posts

Xamarin Forms logo

Xamarin Forms

334
275
5
A complete cross-platform UI toolkit for .NET developers
334
275
+ 1
5
PROS OF XAMARIN FORMS
  • 5
    Native Development SDK with shared C# code-base
CONS OF XAMARIN FORMS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Xamarin Forms posts

    Greg Neumann
    Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1.4M views

    Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

    This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

    But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

    I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

    Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

    See more
    Xamarin logo

    Xamarin

    1.3K
    1.5K
    785
    Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
    1.3K
    1.5K
    + 1
    785
    PROS OF XAMARIN
    • 121
      Power of c# on mobile devices
    • 81
      Native performance
    • 79
      Native apps with native ui controls
    • 73
      No javascript - truely compiled code
    • 67
      Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
    • 45
      Ability to leverage visual studio
    • 44
      Mvvm pattern
    • 44
      Many great c# libraries
    • 36
      Amazing support
    • 34
      Powerful platform for .net developers
    • 19
      GUI Native look and Feel
    • 16
      Nuget package manager
    • 12
      Free
    • 9
      Backed by Microsoft
    • 9
      Enables code reuse on server
    • 8
      Faster Development
    • 7
      Use of third-party .NET libraries
    • 7
      It's free since Apr 2016
    • 7
      Best performance than other cross-platform
    • 7
      Easy Debug and Trace
    • 7
      Open Source
    • 6
      Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
    • 6
      Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
    • 5
      That just work for every scenario
    • 5
      C# mult paradigm language
    • 5
      Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
    • 4
      Great docs
    • 4
      Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
    • 4
      Microsoft stack
    • 4
      Microsoft backed
    • 3
      Well Designed
    • 3
      Small learning curve for Mobile developers
    • 2
      Ionic
    • 2
      Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
    CONS OF XAMARIN
    • 9
      Build times
    • 5
      Visual Studio
    • 4
      Price
    • 3
      Complexity
    • 3
      Scalability
    • 2
      Nuget
    • 2
      Maturity
    • 2
      Build Tools
    • 2
      Support
    • 0
      Maturidade
    • 0
      Performance

    related Xamarin posts

    Greg Neumann
    Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1.4M views

    Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

    This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

    But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

    I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

    Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

    See more
    Bhupendra Madhu
    Web Developer at Ecombooks · | 8 upvotes · 490.6K views

    I want to learn cross-platform application frameworks like React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, or Ionic, and I'm a web developer. I can learn other programming languages as well. But I'm confused about what to learn, which framework is best, and which framework will last long as the application grows further into complexity.

    See more
    Electron logo

    Electron

    10.9K
    9.6K
    148
    Build cross platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS
    10.9K
    9.6K
    + 1
    148
    PROS OF ELECTRON
    • 69
      Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
    • 53
      Open source
    • 14
      Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
    • 8
      Because it's cross platform
    • 4
      Use Node.js in the Main Process
    CONS OF ELECTRON
    • 18
      Uses a lot of memory
    • 8
      User experience never as good as a native app
    • 4
      No proper documentation
    • 4
      Does not native
    • 1
      Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
    • 1
      Wrong reference for dom inspection

    related Electron posts

    The Slack desktop app was originally written us the MacGap framework, which used Apple’s WebView to host web content inside of a native app frame. As this approach continued to present product limitations, Slack decided to migrate the desktop app to Electron. Electron is a platform that combines the rendering engine from Chromium and the Node.js runtime and module system. The desktop app is written as a modern ES6 + async/await React application.

    For the desktop app, Slack takes a hybrid approach, wherein some of the assets ship as part of the app, but most of their assets and code are loaded remotely.

    See more

    Slack's new desktop application was launched for macOS. It was built using Electron for a faster, frameless look with a host of background improvements for a superior Slack experience. Instead of adopting a complete-in-box approach taken by other apps, Slack prefers a hybrid approach where some of the assets are loaded as part of the app, while others are made available remotely. Slack's original desktop app was written using the MacGap v1 framework using WebView to host web content within the native app frame. But it was difficult to upgrade with new features only available to Apple's WKWebView and moving to this view called for a total application rewrite.

    Electron brings together Chromium's rendering engine with the Node.js runtime and module system. The new desktop app is now based on an ES6 + async/await React application is currently being moved gradually to TypeScript. Electron functions on Chromium's multi-process model, with each Slack team signed into a separate process and memory space. It also helps prevent remote content to directly access desktop features using a feature called WebView Element which creates a fresh Chromium renderer process and assigns rendering of content for its hosting renderer. Additional security can be ensured by preventing Node.js modules from leaking into the API surface and watching out for APIs with file paths. Communication between processes on Electron is carried out via electron-remote, a pared-down, zippy version of Electron's remote module, which makes implementing the web apps UI much easier.

    See more
    JavaFX logo

    JavaFX

    273
    404
    10
    A Java library for building Rich Internet Applications
    273
    404
    + 1
    10
    PROS OF JAVAFX
    • 10
      Light
    CONS OF JAVAFX
    • 1
      Community support less than qt
    • 1
      Complicated

    related JavaFX posts

    Shared insights
    on
    JavaFXJavaFXElectronElectron

    I create desktop applications that use a database for storing data. My applications are used as management tools in supermarkets, stores, warehouses, and other places. I don't know which one to use; Electron or JavaFX. Can anyone advise me on this matter?

    See more
    uno logo

    uno

    29
    48
    0
    A uniq like CLI tool for log data
    29
    48
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF UNO
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF UNO
        Be the first to leave a con

        related uno posts

        Qt logo

        Qt

        424
        611
        138
        A leading cross-platform application and UI framework
        424
        611
        + 1
        138
        PROS OF QT
        • 17
          High Performance
        • 13
          Declarative, easy and flexible UI
        • 12
          Cross platform
        • 12
          Performance
        • 9
          Fast prototyping
        • 8
          Easiest integration with C++
        • 8
          Up to date framework
        • 7
          Python
        • 6
          Multiple license including Open Source and Commercial
        • 6
          Safe 2D Renderer
        • 5
          Great Community Support
        • 4
          HW Accelerated UI
        • 4
          Game Engine like UI system
        • 3
          No history of broken compatibility with a major version
        • 3
          JIT and QML Compiler
        • 3
          True cross-platform framework with native code compile
        • 3
          Reliable for industrial use
        • 3
          Pure C++
        • 3
          Been using it since the 90s - runs anywhere does it all
        • 2
          Open source
        • 2
          Easy Integrating to DX and OpenGL and Vulkan
        • 2
          From high to low level coding
        • 1
          Learning Curve
        • 1
          Great mobile support with Felgo add-on
        • 1
          Native looking GUI
        CONS OF QT
        • 5
          Paid
        • 4
          C++ is not so productive
        • 2
          Lack of community support
        • 1
          Lack of libraries
        • 1
          Not detailed documentation

        related Qt posts

        Flutter logo

        Flutter

        15.7K
        15.2K
        1.2K
        Cross-platform mobile framework from Google
        15.7K
        15.2K
        + 1
        1.2K
        PROS OF FLUTTER
        • 139
          Hot Reload
        • 116
          Cross platform
        • 105
          Performance
        • 88
          Backed by Google
        • 72
          Compiled into Native Code
        • 59
          Fast Development
        • 58
          Open Source
        • 53
          Fast Prototyping
        • 49
          Single Codebase
        • 48
          Expressive and Flexible UI
        • 36
          Reactive Programming
        • 34
          Material Design
        • 30
          Dart
        • 29
          Widget-based
        • 26
          Target to Fuchsia
        • 20
          IOS + Android
        • 16
          Great CLI Support
        • 16
          Easy to learn
        • 14
          You can use it as mobile, web, Server development
        • 14
          Tooling
        • 13
          Debugging quickly
        • 13
          Have built-in Material theme
        • 12
          Community
        • 12
          Target to Android
        • 12
          Good docs & sample code
        • 11
          Support by multiple IDE: Android Studio, VS Code, XCode
        • 10
          Easy Testing Support
        • 10
          Written by Dart, which is easy to read code
        • 9
          Target to iOS
        • 9
          Have built-in Cupertino theme
        • 9
          Real platform free framework of the future
        • 8
          Easy to Widget Test
        • 8
          Easy to Unit Test
        CONS OF FLUTTER
        • 29
          Need to learn Dart
        • 10
          Lack of community support
        • 10
          No 3D Graphics Engine Support
        • 8
          Graphics programming
        • 6
          Lack of friendly documentation
        • 2
          Lack of promotion
        • 1
          Https://iphtechnologies.com/difference-between-flutter

        related Flutter posts

        Vaibhav Taunk
        Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 3.4M views

        I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

        See more

        The only two programming languages I know are Python and Dart, I fall in love with Dart when I learned about the type safeness, ease of refactoring, and the help of the IDE. I have an idea for an app, a simple app, but I need SEO and server rendering, and I also want it to be available on all platforms. I can't use Flutter or Dart anymore because of that. I have been searching and looks like there is no way to avoid learning HTML and CSS for this. I want to use Supabase as BASS, at the moment I think that I have two options if I want to learn the least amount of things because of my lack of time available:

        1. Quasar Framework: They claim that I can do all the things I need, but I have to use JavaScript, and I am going to have all those bugs with a type-safe programming language avoidable. I guess I can use TypeScript?, but that means learning both, and I am not sure if I will be able to use 100% Typescript. Besides Vue.js, Node.js, etc.

        2. Blazor and .NET: There is MAUI with razor bindings in .Net now, and also a Blazor server. And as far as I can see, the transition from Dart to C# will be easy. I guess that I have to learn some Javascript here and there, but I have to less things I guess, am I wrong? But Blazor is a new technology, Vue is widely used.

        See more
        Bootstrap logo

        Bootstrap

        56.6K
        13K
        7.6K
        Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
        56.6K
        13K
        + 1
        7.6K
        PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
        • 1.6K
          Responsiveness
        • 1.2K
          UI components
        • 942
          Consistent
        • 779
          Great docs
        • 676
          Flexible
        • 472
          HTML, CSS, and JS framework
        • 411
          Open source
        • 374
          Widely used
        • 367
          Customizable
        • 242
          HTML framework
        • 77
          Popular
        • 77
          Mobile first
        • 77
          Easy setup
        • 58
          Great grid system
        • 52
          Great community
        • 38
          Future compatibility
        • 34
          Integration
        • 28
          Very powerful foundational front-end framework
        • 24
          Standard
        • 23
          Javascript plugins
        • 19
          Build faster prototypes
        • 18
          Preprocessors
        • 14
          Grids
        • 9
          Good for a person who hates CSS
        • 8
          Clean
        • 4
          Easy to setup and learn
        • 4
          Love it
        • 4
          Rapid development
        • 3
          Great and easy to use
        • 2
          Community
        • 2
          Provide angular wrapper
        • 2
          Great and easy
        • 2
          Boostrap
        • 2
          Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
        • 2
          Great customer support
        • 2
          Popularity
        • 2
          Clean and quick frontend development
        • 2
          Great and easy to make a responsive website
        • 2
          Sprzedam opla
        • 2
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Responsive design
        • 1
          Geo
        • 1
          Painless front end development
        • 1
          Design Agnostic
        • 1
          So clean and simple
        • 1
          Numerous components
        • 1
          Recognizable
        • 1
          Intuitive
        • 1
          Material-ui
        • 1
          Love the classes?
        • 1
          Pre-Defined components
        • 1
          It's fast
        • 1
          Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
        • 1
          The fame
        • 1
          Easy setup2
        • 1
          Not tied to jQuery
        CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
        • 26
          Javascript is tied to jquery
        • 16
          Every site uses the defaults
        • 15
          Grid system break points aren't ideal
        • 14
          Too much heavy decoration in default look
        • 8
          Verbose styles
        • 1
          Super heavy

        related Bootstrap posts

        Ganesa Vijayakumar
        Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 4.3M views

        I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

        I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

        As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

        UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

        Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

        Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

        Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

        Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

        Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

        Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

        Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

        Thanks, Ganesa

        See more
        Francisco Quintero
        Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1.5M views

        For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

        What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

        You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

        We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

        Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

        We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

        An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

        Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

        See more