Alternatives to Azure Key Vault logo

Alternatives to Azure Key Vault

AWS Key Management Service, LastPass, CyberArk, AWS Secrets Manager, and KeePass are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Azure Key Vault.
99
0

What is Azure Key Vault and what are its top alternatives?

Azure Key Vault is a cloud service provided by Microsoft that helps safeguard cryptographic keys and secrets used by cloud applications and services. Key features include secure storage and management of keys, secrets, and certificates, integration with other Azure services, role-based access control, and auditing capabilities. One limitation is that it is primarily designed for Azure services and may require additional configurations for non-Azure environments.

  1. AWS Key Management Service (KMS): AWS KMS is a managed service that makes it easy for you to create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data. It integrates seamlessly with other AWS services and provides strong encryption and key management features. Pros: Integration with a wide range of AWS services, flexible key management options. Cons: Limited support for non-AWS workloads.
  2. Google Cloud Key Management Service (KMS): Google Cloud KMS allows you to create, manage, and use cryptographic keys for encryption and decryption. It is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform services and offers high availability and scalability. Pros: Seamless integration with Google Cloud Platform, centrally managed keys. Cons: Limited support for non-GCP environments.
  3. HashiCorp Vault: HashiCorp Vault is a popular open-source tool for managing secrets and protecting sensitive data. It provides a centralized secret management solution with features like dynamic secrets, encryption as a service, and secure access controls. Pros: Open-source and highly customizable, support for multiple cloud providers. Cons: Requires more configuration and maintenance compared to managed services like Azure Key Vault.
  4. IBM Key Protect: IBM Key Protect is a key management service that helps you create and manage encryption keys for your cloud applications. It offers encryption key lifecycle management, audit logging, and integration with IBM Cloud services. Pros: Integration with IBM Cloud services, strong encryption and key management capabilities. Cons: Limited support for non-IBM environments.
  5. Alibaba Cloud Key Management Service (KMS): Alibaba Cloud KMS allows you to centrally manage encryption keys used to secure your data in the cloud. It offers key management features like key rotation, access control, and encryption key protection. Pros: Integration with Alibaba Cloud services, strong security features. Cons: Limited support for non-Alibaba Cloud environments.
  6. CyberArk Conjur: CyberArk Conjur is a secrets management solution that helps secure and manage secrets used by applications, containers, and CI/CD pipelines. It provides automated secret rotation, access controls, and audit trails for secret management. Pros: Automated secret rotation, support for containerized environments. Cons: More focused on secrets management than key management.
  7. Vault by AppsCode: Vault by AppsCode is a Kubernetes native solution for managing secrets and sensitive data within Kubernetes clusters. It offers features like automated secret injection, secrets encryption, and secure access controls for Kubernetes applications. Pros: Kubernetes native solution, seamless integration with Kubernetes workloads. Cons: Limited to Kubernetes environments.
  8. Azure Dedicated HSM: Azure Dedicated HSM is a cloud-based Hardware Security Module (HSM) service that provides secure key storage and cryptographic operations for sensitive data. It offers FIPS 140-2 Level 3 validated HSMs and flexible key management options. Pros: High level of security with dedicated HSMs, integration with Azure services. Cons: Higher cost compared to software-based key management services like Azure Key Vault.
  9. Nutanix Xi IoT Key Manager: Nutanix Xi IoT Key Manager is a key management service designed for IoT devices and applications running on Nutanix infrastructure. It offers secure key storage, encryption key management, and device authentication capabilities for IoT deployments. Pros: Built for IoT environments, seamless integration with Nutanix infrastructure. Cons: Limited to Nutanix IoT deployments.
  10. Thales CipherTrust: Thales CipherTrust Manager is a key management solution that helps organizations secure encryption keys across multiple environments. It offers centralized key management, encryption key lifecycle management, and support for various encryption technologies. Pros: Centralized key management across environments, support for hybrid cloud deployments. Cons: Higher complexity and learning curve compared to simpler key management services.

Top Alternatives to Azure Key Vault

  • AWS Key Management Service
    AWS Key Management Service

    AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data, and uses Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) to protect the security of your keys. AWS Key Management Service is integrated with other AWS services including Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, and Amazon Redshift. AWS Key Management Service is also integrated with AWS CloudTrail to provide you with logs of all key usage to help meet your regulatory and compliance needs. ...

  • LastPass
    LastPass

    LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing. ...

  • CyberArk
    CyberArk

    It is the only security software company focused on eliminating cyber threats using insider privileges to attack the heart of the enterprise. ...

  • AWS Secrets Manager
    AWS Secrets Manager

    AWS Secrets Manager helps you protect secrets needed to access your applications, services, and IT resources. The service enables you to easily rotate, manage, and retrieve database credentials, API keys, and other secrets throughout their lifecycle. ...

  • KeePass
    KeePass

    It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

Azure Key Vault alternatives & related posts

AWS Key Management Service logo

AWS Key Management Service

237
171
14
Easily create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data
237
171
+ 1
14
PROS OF AWS KEY MANAGEMENT SERVICE
  • 6
    Integrated with AWS CloudTrail
  • 4
    KMS
  • 4
    Backed by Amazon
  • 0
    Free
CONS OF AWS KEY MANAGEMENT SERVICE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related AWS Key Management Service posts

    LastPass logo

    LastPass

    310
    313
    83
    Password manager that works with all browsers & smartphones
    310
    313
    + 1
    83
    PROS OF LASTPASS
    • 20
      Synchronised across browsers
    • 17
      Chrome plugin
    • 15
      Passwords stored encrpyted
    • 9
      Central servers do not have keys
    • 9
      All devices
    • 3
      Better then lesspass
    • 3
      Company wide
    • 3
      The most cost-effective b/t Roboform and 1Password
    • 2
      Free plan
    • 1
      Cross Platform
    • 1
      Its just better
    CONS OF LASTPASS
    • 3
      Slow, unpredictable sync when sharing passwords
    • 3
      UI for admins is an inconsistent mess
    • 2
      Paid
    • 1
      Buggy Chrome add-on
    • 1
      Cannot edit shared password

    related LastPass posts

    Justin Dorfman
    Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 3 upvotes · 305.7K views
    Shared insights
    on
    LastPassLastPass1Password1Password

    I use LastPass because it had Android support before 1Password. Also, it's just a great product. It gives me peace of mind with 2-step auth and a YubiKey.

    The only thing that drives me nuts is the password generator, sometimes it just doesn't work on certain sites. That is why I wrote/use g20 😎

    See more

    Firebase Cloud Firestore Cloud Functions for Firebase Google App Engine React React Native React Native Firebase NativeBase Twilio Dwolla.js Yarn fastlane Bitbucket Slack LastPass

    See more
    CyberArk logo

    CyberArk

    42
    71
    0
    Proactively stops the most advanced cyber threats
    42
    71
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF CYBERARK
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF CYBERARK
        Be the first to leave a con

        related CyberArk posts

        AWS Secrets Manager logo

        AWS Secrets Manager

        131
        157
        5
        Store, Distribute, and Rotate Credentials Securely
        131
        157
        + 1
        5
        PROS OF AWS SECRETS MANAGER
        • 5
          Managed Service
        CONS OF AWS SECRETS MANAGER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related AWS Secrets Manager posts

          KeePass logo

          KeePass

          69
          96
          30
          A free and open source password manager
          69
          96
          + 1
          30
          PROS OF KEEPASS
          • 9
            Free
          • 7
            Password stored encrypted
          • 4
            Password Generator
          • 3
            Plugings
          • 3
            Advanced Search
          • 3
            Import & Export
          • 1
            Biometric unlock
          • 0
            TOTP
          CONS OF KEEPASS
          • 1
            Password share is unencrypted
          • 0
            Free

          related KeePass posts

          Postman logo

          Postman

          94.4K
          80.9K
          1.8K
          Only complete API development environment
          94.4K
          80.9K
          + 1
          1.8K
          PROS OF POSTMAN
          • 490
            Easy to use
          • 369
            Great tool
          • 276
            Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
          • 156
            Easy setup, looks good
          • 144
            The best api workflow out there
          • 53
            It's the best
          • 53
            History feature
          • 44
            Adds real value to my workflow
          • 43
            Great interface that magically predicts your needs
          • 35
            The best in class app
          • 12
            Can save and share script
          • 10
            Fully featured without looking cluttered
          • 8
            Collections
          • 8
            Option to run scrips
          • 8
            Global/Environment Variables
          • 7
            Shareable Collections
          • 7
            Dead simple and useful. Excellent
          • 7
            Dark theme easy on the eyes
          • 6
            Awesome customer support
          • 6
            Great integration with newman
          • 5
            Documentation
          • 5
            Simple
          • 5
            The test script is useful
          • 4
            Saves responses
          • 4
            This has simplified my testing significantly
          • 4
            Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
          • 4
            Easy as pie
          • 3
            API-network
          • 3
            I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
          • 3
            Mocking API calls with predefined response
          • 2
            Now supports GraphQL
          • 2
            Postman Runner CI Integration
          • 2
            Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
          • 2
            Continuous integration using newman
          • 2
            Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
          • 2
            Runner
          • 2
            Graph
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF POSTMAN
          • 10
            Stores credentials in HTTP
          • 9
            Bloated features and UI
          • 8
            Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
          • 7
            Poor GraphQL support
          • 5
            Expensive
          • 3
            Not free after 5 users
          • 3
            Can't prompt for per-request variables
          • 1
            Import swagger
          • 1
            Support websocket
          • 1
            Import curl

          related Postman posts

          Noah Zoschke
          Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

          We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

          Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

          Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

          This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

          Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

          Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

          Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Postman logo

          Postman

          94.4K
          80.9K
          1.8K
          Only complete API development environment
          94.4K
          80.9K
          + 1
          1.8K
          PROS OF POSTMAN
          • 490
            Easy to use
          • 369
            Great tool
          • 276
            Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
          • 156
            Easy setup, looks good
          • 144
            The best api workflow out there
          • 53
            It's the best
          • 53
            History feature
          • 44
            Adds real value to my workflow
          • 43
            Great interface that magically predicts your needs
          • 35
            The best in class app
          • 12
            Can save and share script
          • 10
            Fully featured without looking cluttered
          • 8
            Collections
          • 8
            Option to run scrips
          • 8
            Global/Environment Variables
          • 7
            Shareable Collections
          • 7
            Dead simple and useful. Excellent
          • 7
            Dark theme easy on the eyes
          • 6
            Awesome customer support
          • 6
            Great integration with newman
          • 5
            Documentation
          • 5
            Simple
          • 5
            The test script is useful
          • 4
            Saves responses
          • 4
            This has simplified my testing significantly
          • 4
            Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
          • 4
            Easy as pie
          • 3
            API-network
          • 3
            I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
          • 3
            Mocking API calls with predefined response
          • 2
            Now supports GraphQL
          • 2
            Postman Runner CI Integration
          • 2
            Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
          • 2
            Continuous integration using newman
          • 2
            Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
          • 2
            Runner
          • 2
            Graph
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF POSTMAN
          • 10
            Stores credentials in HTTP
          • 9
            Bloated features and UI
          • 8
            Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
          • 7
            Poor GraphQL support
          • 5
            Expensive
          • 3
            Not free after 5 users
          • 3
            Can't prompt for per-request variables
          • 1
            Import swagger
          • 1
            Support websocket
          • 1
            Import curl

          related Postman posts

          Noah Zoschke
          Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

          We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

          Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

          Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

          This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

          Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

          Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

          Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Stack Overflow logo

          Stack Overflow

          69K
          61K
          893
          Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
          69K
          61K
          + 1
          893
          PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
          • 257
            Scary smart community
          • 206
            Knows all
          • 142
            Voting system
          • 134
            Good questions
          • 83
            Good SEO
          • 22
            Addictive
          • 14
            Tight focus
          • 10
            Share and gain knowledge
          • 7
            Useful
          • 3
            Fast loading
          • 2
            Gamification
          • 1
            Knows everyone
          • 1
            Experts share experience and answer questions
          • 1
            Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
          • 1
            Questions answered quickly
          • 1
            No annoying ads
          • 1
            No spam
          • 1
            Fast community response
          • 1
            Good moderators
          • 1
            Quick answers from users
          • 1
            Good answers
          • 1
            User reputation ranking
          • 1
            Efficient answers
          • 1
            Leading developer community
          CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
          • 3
            Not welcoming to newbies
          • 3
            Unfair downvoting
          • 3
            Unfriendly moderators
          • 3
            No opinion based questions
          • 3
            Mean users
          • 2
            Limited to types of questions it can accept

          related Stack Overflow posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more