Alternatives to Azure Machine Learning logo

Alternatives to Azure Machine Learning

Python, Azure Databricks, Amazon SageMaker, Amazon Machine Learning, and Databricks are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Azure Machine Learning.
180
260
+ 1
0

What is Azure Machine Learning and what are its top alternatives?

Azure Machine Learning is a fully-managed cloud service that enables data scientists and developers to efficiently embed predictive analytics into their applications, helping organizations use massive data sets and bring all the benefits of the cloud to machine learning.
Azure Machine Learning is a tool in the Machine Learning as a Service category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Azure Machine Learning

  • Python

    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Azure Databricks

    Azure Databricks

    Accelerate big data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) solutions with Azure Databricks, a fast, easy and collaborative Apache Spark–based analytics service. ...

  • Amazon SageMaker

    Amazon SageMaker

    A fully-managed service that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. ...

  • Amazon Machine Learning

    Amazon Machine Learning

    This new AWS service helps you to use all of that data you’ve been collecting to improve the quality of your decisions. You can build and fine-tune predictive models using large amounts of data, and then use Amazon Machine Learning to make predictions (in batch mode or in real-time) at scale. You can benefit from machine learning even if you don’t have an advanced degree in statistics or the desire to setup, run, and maintain your own processing and storage infrastructure. ...

  • Databricks

    Databricks

    Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, from the original creators of Apache Spark™, unifies data science and engineering across the Machine Learning lifecycle from data preparation to experimentation and deployment of ML applications. ...

  • MLflow

    MLflow

    MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle. ...

  • TensorFlow

    TensorFlow

    TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API. ...

  • IBM Watson

    IBM Watson

    It combines artificial intelligence (AI) and sophisticated analytical software for optimal performance as a "question answering" machine. ...

Azure Machine Learning alternatives & related posts

Python logo

Python

117.2K
91.4K
6.4K
A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
117.2K
91.4K
+ 1
6.4K
PROS OF PYTHON
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 920
    Readable code
  • 814
    Beautiful code
  • 763
    Rapid development
  • 668
    Large community
  • 414
    Open source
  • 375
    Elegant
  • 264
    Great community
  • 257
    Object oriented
  • 206
    Dynamic typing
  • 68
    Great standard library
  • 51
    Very fast
  • 47
    Functional programming
  • 33
    Scientific computing
  • 31
    Easy to learn
  • 29
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Matlab alternative
  • 22
    Productivity
  • 21
    Easy to read
  • 19
    Simple is better than complex
  • 17
    It's the way I think
  • 17
    Imperative
  • 15
    Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
  • 14
    Free
  • 14
    Powerful
  • 13
    Fast and simple
  • 13
    Powerfull language
  • 12
    Scripting
  • 9
    Machine learning support
  • 9
    Explicit is better than implicit
  • 8
    Ease of development
  • 8
    Unlimited power
  • 7
    Import antigravity
  • 7
    Clear and easy and powerfull
  • 6
    Print "life is short, use python"
  • 6
    It's lean and fun to code
  • 5
    Great for tooling
  • 5
    Fast coding and good for competitions
  • 5
    There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
  • 5
    Python has great libraries for data processing
  • 5
    High Documented language
  • 5
    I love snakes
  • 5
    Although practicality beats purity
  • 5
    Flat is better than nested
  • 4
    Readability counts
  • 3
    Multiple Inheritence
  • 3
    Complex is better than complicated
  • 3
    Lists, tuples, dictionaries
  • 3
    Plotting
  • 3
    Rapid Prototyping
  • 3
    Great for analytics
  • 3
    Socially engaged community
  • 3
    Beautiful is better than ugly
  • 3
    CG industry needs
  • 2
    No cruft
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    List comprehensions
  • 2
    Generators
  • 2
    Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
  • 2
    Now is better than never
  • 2
    If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
  • 2
    If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
  • 2
    Simple and easy to learn
  • 2
    Import this
  • 1
    Powerful language for AI
  • 1
    Because of Netflix
  • 1
    Pip install everything
  • 1
    Web scraping
  • 1
    Better outcome
  • 1
    Batteries included
  • 1
    Easy to setup and run smooth
  • 1
    It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
  • 1
    Only one way to do it
  • 1
    A-to-Z
  • 1
    Many types of collections
  • 1
    Flexible and easy
  • 0
    Pro
  • 0
    Powerful
CONS OF PYTHON
  • 49
    Still divided between python 2 and python 3
  • 26
    Poor syntax for anonymous functions
  • 26
    Performance impact
  • 18
    GIL
  • 18
    Package management is a mess
  • 13
    Too imperative-oriented
  • 12
    Hard to understand
  • 10
    Dynamic typing
  • 8
    Very slow
  • 8
    Not everything is expression
  • 7
    Indentations matter a lot
  • 7
    Explicit self parameter in methods
  • 6
    Poor DSL capabilities
  • 6
    No anonymous functions
  • 6
    Requires C functions for dynamic modules
  • 5
    Hard to obfuscate
  • 5
    The "lisp style" whitespaces
  • 4
    The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
  • 4
    Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
  • 4
    Threading
  • 4
    Fake object-oriented programming
  • 4
    Incredibly slow
  • 3
    Not suitable for autocomplete
  • 3
    Official documentation is unclear.
  • 2
    Circular import
  • 1
    Training wheels (forced indentation)
  • 1
    Meta classes

related Python posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 37 upvotes · 3.5M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Nick Parsons
Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 1.2M views

Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

#FrameworksFullStack #Languages

See more
Azure Databricks logo

Azure Databricks

127
195
0
Fast, easy, and collaborative Apache Spark–based analytics service
127
195
+ 1
0
PROS OF AZURE DATABRICKS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AZURE DATABRICKS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Azure Databricks posts

      Amazon SageMaker logo

      Amazon SageMaker

      173
      194
      0
      Accelerated Machine Learning
      173
      194
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF AMAZON SAGEMAKER
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF AMAZON SAGEMAKER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Amazon SageMaker posts

          Julien DeFrance
          Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 2 upvotes · 43.6K views

          Which #IaaS / #PaaS to chose? Not all #Cloud providers are created equal. As you start to use one or the other, you'll build around very specific services that don't have their equivalent elsewhere.

          Back in 2014/2015, this decision I made for SmartZip was a no-brainer and #AWS won. AWS has been a leader, and over the years demonstrated their capacity to innovate, and reducing toil. Like no other.

          Year after year, this kept on being confirmed, as they rolled out new (managed) services, got into Serverless with AWS Lambda / FaaS And allowed domains such as #AI / #MachineLearning to be put into the hands of every developers thanks to Amazon Machine Learning or Amazon SageMaker for instance.

          Should you compare with #GCP for instance, it's not quite there yet. Building around these managed services, #AWS allowed me to get my developers on a whole new level. Where they know what's under the hood. Where they know they have these services available and can build around them. Where they care and are responsible for operations and security and deployment of what they've worked on.

          See more

          Amazon SageMaker constricts the use of their own mxnet package and does not offer a strong Kubernetes backbone. At the same time, Kubeflow is still quite buggy and cumbersome to use. Which tool is a better pick for MLOps pipelines (both from the perspective of scalability and depth)?

          See more
          Amazon Machine Learning logo

          Amazon Machine Learning

          131
          202
          0
          Visualization tools and wizards that guide you through the process of creating ML models w/o having to learn...
          131
          202
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF AMAZON MACHINE LEARNING
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF AMAZON MACHINE LEARNING
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Amazon Machine Learning posts

              Julien DeFrance
              Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 2 upvotes · 43.6K views

              Which #IaaS / #PaaS to chose? Not all #Cloud providers are created equal. As you start to use one or the other, you'll build around very specific services that don't have their equivalent elsewhere.

              Back in 2014/2015, this decision I made for SmartZip was a no-brainer and #AWS won. AWS has been a leader, and over the years demonstrated their capacity to innovate, and reducing toil. Like no other.

              Year after year, this kept on being confirmed, as they rolled out new (managed) services, got into Serverless with AWS Lambda / FaaS And allowed domains such as #AI / #MachineLearning to be put into the hands of every developers thanks to Amazon Machine Learning or Amazon SageMaker for instance.

              Should you compare with #GCP for instance, it's not quite there yet. Building around these managed services, #AWS allowed me to get my developers on a whole new level. Where they know what's under the hood. Where they know they have these services available and can build around them. Where they care and are responsible for operations and security and deployment of what they've worked on.

              See more
              Databricks logo

              Databricks

              209
              346
              0
              A unified analytics platform, powered by Apache Spark
              209
              346
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF DATABRICKS
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF DATABRICKS
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Databricks posts

                  MLflow logo

                  MLflow

                  94
                  313
                  6
                  An open source machine learning platform
                  94
                  313
                  + 1
                  6
                  PROS OF MLFLOW
                  • 3
                    Code First
                  • 3
                    Simplified Logging
                  CONS OF MLFLOW
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related MLflow posts

                    TensorFlow logo

                    TensorFlow

                    2.3K
                    2.5K
                    75
                    Open Source Software Library for Machine Intelligence
                    2.3K
                    2.5K
                    + 1
                    75
                    PROS OF TENSORFLOW
                    • 23
                      High Performance
                    • 16
                      Connect Research and Production
                    • 13
                      Deep Flexibility
                    • 9
                      Auto-Differentiation
                    • 9
                      True Portability
                    • 2
                      Easy to use
                    • 2
                      High level abstraction
                    • 1
                      Powerful
                    CONS OF TENSORFLOW
                    • 8
                      Hard
                    • 5
                      Hard to debug
                    • 1
                      Documentation not very helpful

                    related TensorFlow posts

                    Conor Myhrvold
                    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 8 upvotes · 1.2M views

                    Why we built an open source, distributed training framework for TensorFlow , Keras , and PyTorch:

                    At Uber, we apply deep learning across our business; from self-driving research to trip forecasting and fraud prevention, deep learning enables our engineers and data scientists to create better experiences for our users.

                    TensorFlow has become a preferred deep learning library at Uber for a variety of reasons. To start, the framework is one of the most widely used open source frameworks for deep learning, which makes it easy to onboard new users. It also combines high performance with an ability to tinker with low-level model details—for instance, we can use both high-level APIs, such as Keras, and implement our own custom operators using NVIDIA’s CUDA toolkit.

                    Uber has introduced Michelangelo (https://eng.uber.com/michelangelo/), an internal ML-as-a-service platform that democratizes machine learning and makes it easy to build and deploy these systems at scale. In this article, we pull back the curtain on Horovod, an open source component of Michelangelo’s deep learning toolkit which makes it easier to start—and speed up—distributed deep learning projects with TensorFlow:

                    https://eng.uber.com/horovod/

                    (Direct GitHub repo: https://github.com/uber/horovod)

                    See more

                    In mid-2015, Uber began exploring ways to scale ML across the organization, avoiding ML anti-patterns while standardizing workflows and tools. This effort led to Michelangelo.

                    Michelangelo consists of a mix of open source systems and components built in-house. The primary open sourced components used are HDFS, Spark, Samza, Cassandra, MLLib, XGBoost, and TensorFlow.

                    !

                    See more
                    IBM Watson logo

                    IBM Watson

                    107
                    135
                    6
                    A question-answering computer system capable of answering questions posed in natural language
                    107
                    135
                    + 1
                    6
                    PROS OF IBM WATSON
                    • 2
                      Api
                    • 1
                      Intent auto-generation
                    • 1
                      Custom webhooks
                    • 1
                      Disambiguation
                    • 1
                      Prebuilt front-end GUI
                    CONS OF IBM WATSON
                    • 1
                      Multi-lingual

                    related IBM Watson posts