Alternatives to CarrierWave logo

Alternatives to CarrierWave

Paperclip, Shrine, Cloudinary, Google Drive, and CloudFlare are the most popular alternatives and competitors to CarrierWave.
113
93
+ 1
3

What is CarrierWave and what are its top alternatives?

CarrierWave is a popular Ruby gem that allows developers to easily manage file uploads in their Ruby on Rails applications. It provides support for various storage options such as local storage, Amazon S3, and more, and offers features like image processing, validation, and custom storage solutions. However, CarrierWave has a steep learning curve and might not be as actively maintained as before, leading some developers to explore alternative solutions.

  1. Shrine: Shrine is a versatile file uploading toolkit for Ruby applications that offers modular design, scalability, and a wide range of plugins for handling various storage services. It supports direct uploads, background processing, and provides a clean and flexible architecture. However, Shrine might have a steeper learning curve compared to CarrierWave.

  2. Paperclip: Paperclip is a simple Ruby gem for file uploads that integrates seamlessly with ActiveRecord. It provides support for image processing, validation, and various storage options. Paperclip is easy to set up and use, but its development has slowed down in recent years.

  3. Active Storage: Active Storage is a built-in solution for file uploads in Ruby on Rails applications. It simplifies file uploads by providing direct integration with Rails and supports popular cloud storage services like Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage. However, Active Storage might lack some advanced features compared to CarrierWave.

  4. Dragonfly: Dragonfly is a Ruby gem for on-the-fly image processing and hosting. It offers an easy way to handle image uploads, transformations, and serving, making it an appealing alternative to CarrierWave for image-heavy applications. However, Dragonfly might not be as widely used or supported as other solutions.

  5. Refile: Refile is a modern file upload library for Ruby applications that aims to be simple, flexible, and extendable. It provides support for multiple backends, direct uploads, and customizable processing. Refile is easy to set up and use, but it might lack some advanced features compared to CarrierWave.

  6. MiniMagick: MiniMagick is a Ruby gem that provides a simple interface to manipulate images using the ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick command-line tools. It can be used in conjunction with other file upload libraries to handle image processing tasks effectively. However, MiniMagick focuses solely on image manipulation and might not offer the comprehensive features of CarrierWave.

  7. ImageProcessing: ImageProcessing is a Ruby gem for image processing that offers a clean API and support for various backends like ImageMagick and Libvips. It is designed to be fast, efficient, and easy to use, making it a suitable choice for handling image uploads alongside other file upload solutions. However, ImageProcessing might not provide the same level of file management capabilities as CarrierWave.

  8. Refile: Refile is another Ruby gem for file uploads that focuses on simplicity and flexibility. It supports various storage backends, direct uploads, and custom processing, making it a versatile choice for handling file uploads in Ruby applications. However, Refile might lack some of the advanced features found in CarrierWave.

  9. Pond: Pond is a file upload library for Ruby that offers scalability, performance, and flexibility. It provides support for direct uploads, background processing, and easy integration with cloud storage services. Pond is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it a promising alternative to CarrierWave for certain use cases.

  10. Roda: Roda is a versatile Ruby web framework that includes features for handling file uploads, among other things. It provides a robust and flexible architecture, support for various plugins, and a streamlined development workflow. Roda can be a suitable alternative to CarrierWave for developers looking for a more comprehensive web development framework.

Top Alternatives to CarrierWave

  • Paperclip
    Paperclip

    It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible. ...

  • Shrine
    Shrine

    Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface. ...

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

CarrierWave alternatives & related posts

Paperclip logo

Paperclip

80
0
A file attachment management for ActiveRecord
80
0
PROS OF PAPERCLIP
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF PAPERCLIP
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Paperclip posts

      Shrine logo

      Shrine

      13
      0
      A file upload toolkit
      13
      0
      PROS OF SHRINE
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF SHRINE
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Shrine posts

          Cloudinary logo

          Cloudinary

          604
          179
          An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
          604
          179
          PROS OF CLOUDINARY
          • 37
            Easy setup
          • 31
            Fast image delivery
          • 26
            Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
          • 21
            Free tier
          • 11
            Heroku add-on
          • 9
            Reduce development costs
          • 7
            Amazing support
          • 6
            Heroku plugin
          • 6
            Great libraries for all languages
          • 6
            Virtually limitless scale
          • 5
            Easy to integrate with Rails
          • 4
            Cheap
          • 3
            Shot setup time
          • 3
            Very easy setup
          • 2
            Solves alot of image problems.
          • 1
            Best in the market and includes free plan
          • 1
            Extremely generous free pricing tier
          • 0
            Fast image delivery, vast array
          CONS OF CLOUDINARY
          • 5
            Paid plan is expensive

          related Cloudinary posts

          Google Drive logo

          Google Drive

          83.8K
          2.1K
          A safe place for all your files
          83.8K
          2.1K
          PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
          • 505
            Easy to use
          • 326
            Gmail integration
          • 312
            Enough free space
          • 268
            Collaboration
          • 249
            Stable service
          • 128
            Desktop and mobile apps
          • 97
            Offline sync
          • 79
            Apps
          • 74
            15 gb storage
          • 50
            Add-ons
          • 9
            Integrates well
          • 6
            Easy to use
          • 3
            Simple back-up tool
          • 2
            Linux terminal transfer tools
          • 2
            It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
          • 2
            Amazing
          • 2
            Beautiful
          • 2
            Fast upload speeds
          • 2
            The more the merrier
          • 2
            So easy
          • 2
            Wonderful
          • 1
            G Suite integration
          • 1
            UI
          • 1
            Windows desktop
          • 1
            Space Analytics
          CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
          • 7
            Organization via web ui sucks
          • 2
            Not a real database

          related Google Drive posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

          I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

          Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

          See more
          CloudFlare logo

          CloudFlare

          77.3K
          1.8K
          The Web Performance & Security Company.
          77.3K
          1.8K
          PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
          • 426
            Easy setup, great cdn
          • 278
            Free ssl
          • 200
            Easy setup
          • 191
            Security
          • 181
            Ssl
          • 98
            Great cdn
          • 77
            Optimizer
          • 71
            Simple
          • 44
            Great UI
          • 28
            Great js cdn
          • 12
            AutoMinify
          • 12
            HTTP/2 Support
          • 12
            Apps
          • 12
            DNS Analytics
          • 9
            Ipv6
          • 9
            Rocket Loader
          • 9
            Easy
          • 8
            Fantastic CDN service
          • 8
            IPv6 "One Click"
          • 7
            DNSSEC
          • 7
            Free GeoIP
          • 7
            Amazing performance
          • 7
            API
          • 7
            Cheapest SSL
          • 7
            Nice DNS
          • 7
            SSHFP
          • 6
            SPDY
          • 6
            Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
          • 5
            Asynchronous resource loading
          • 5
            Ubuntu
          • 4
            Global Load Balancing
          • 4
            Easy Use
          • 4
            Performance
          • 3
            CDN
          • 2
            Support for SSHFP records
          • 2
            Registrar
          • 1
            Web3
          • 1
            Прохси
          • 1
            HTTPS3/Quic
          CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
          • 2
            No support for SSHFP records
          • 2
            Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

          related CloudFlare posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Johnny Bell

          When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

          One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

          Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

          When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

          I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

          See more
          Dropbox logo

          Dropbox

          23.5K
          1.7K
          Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
          23.5K
          1.7K
          PROS OF DROPBOX
          • 434
            Easy to work with
          • 256
            Free
          • 216
            Popular
          • 176
            Shared file hosting
          • 167
            'just works'
          • 100
            No brainer
          • 80
            Integration with external services
          • 77
            Simple
          • 49
            Good api
          • 38
            Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
          • 11
            It just works
          • 8
            Convenient
          • 7
            Accessible from all of my devices
          • 5
            Command Line client
          • 4
            Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
          • 4
            Can even be used by your grandma
          • 3
            Cross platform app
          • 3
            Sync API
          • 3
            Reliable
          • 3
            Mac app
          • 2
            Backups, local and cloud
          • 2
            Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
          • 2
            Delta synchronization
          • 2
            Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
          • 2
            Extended version history
          • 2
            Beautiful UI
          • 1
            YC Company
          • 1
            What a beautiful app
          • 1
            Easy/no setup
          • 1
            So easy
          • 1
            The more the merrier
          • 1
            Easy to work with
          • 1
            For when client needs file without opening firewall
          • 1
            Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Official Linux app
          • 0
            The more the merrier
          CONS OF DROPBOX
          • 3
            Personal vs company account is confusing
          • 1
            Replication kills CPU and battery

          related Dropbox posts

          Shared insights
          on
          Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

          I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

          Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

          Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

          See more
          Amazon CloudFront logo

          Amazon CloudFront

          21.5K
          935
          Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
          21.5K
          935
          PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
          • 245
            Fast
          • 166
            Cdn
          • 157
            Compatible with other aws services
          • 125
            Simple
          • 108
            Global
          • 41
            Cheap
          • 36
            Cost-effective
          • 27
            Reliable
          • 19
            One stop solution
          • 9
            Elastic
          • 1
            Object store
          • 1
            HTTP/2 Support
          CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
          • 3
            UI could use some work
          • 1
            Invalidations take so long

          related Amazon CloudFront posts

          Russel Werner
          Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.9M views

          StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

          Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

          #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

          See more
          Julien DeFrance
          Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

          Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

          I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

          For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

          Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

          Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

          Future improvements / technology decisions included:

          Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

          As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

          One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

          See more
          Akamai logo

          Akamai

          1.9K
          0
          The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
          1.9K
          0
          PROS OF AKAMAI
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF AKAMAI
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Akamai posts