Alternatives to FileMaker logo

Alternatives to FileMaker

Google App Maker, MySQL, Airtable, JavaScript, and Python are the most popular alternatives and competitors to FileMaker.
37
42
+ 1
8

What is FileMaker and what are its top alternatives?

FileMaker is a versatile and user-friendly relational database management software that allows users to create custom apps for their businesses without extensive programming knowledge. Its key features include drag-and-drop interface, custom app creation, real-time data sharing, automation capabilities, and integration with other platforms. However, some limitations of FileMaker include the high cost of licensing, limited scalability for large enterprises, and potential complexity in designing advanced functionalities.

  1. Zoho Creator: Zoho Creator is a low-code application development platform that allows users to build customized business applications. Key features include drag-and-drop interface, workflow automation, reporting tools, and integration with third-party services. Pros of Zoho Creator include cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while cons include limited advanced customization options compared to FileMaker.
  2. Airtable: Airtable is a cloud-based collaboration platform that combines the features of a spreadsheet and database. It offers customizable databases, project management tools, collaboration features, and integration with other apps. Pros of Airtable include flexibility and ease of use, while cons include limitations in complex data relationships and reporting capabilities.
  3. Quick Base: Quick Base is a no-code application development platform that enables users to create custom business solutions. Key features include visual app building, automation tools, reporting capabilities, and integration with existing systems. Pros of Quick Base include rapid application development and scalability, while cons include the learning curve for beginners.
  4. Knack: Knack is an online database builder for creating custom business applications. It offers features such as customization options, data visualization tools, workflow automation, and integration with other platforms. Pros of Knack include ease of use and flexibility, while cons include limited advanced functionalities for complex applications.
  5. Ninox: Ninox is a cloud-based database platform that allows users to create custom business applications. It offers features like data modeling tools, customizable templates, automation capabilities, and integration with other services. Pros of Ninox include versatility and scalability, while cons include the complexity of designing advanced applications.
  6. AppSheet: AppSheet is a no-code application development platform acquired by Google that enables users to create custom mobile and web applications. Key features include data modeling tools, workflow automation, reporting capabilities, and integration with Google Workspace. Pros of AppSheet include integration with Google services, while cons include limitations in customization compared to FileMaker.
  7. Knack: Podio is a cloud-based platform that combines project management, CRM, and collaboration tools into one integrated solution. It offers features like customizable workspaces, task management, file sharing, and integration with other services. Pros of Podio include versatility and collaboration features, while cons include complexity in setting up workflows and apps.
  8. Matrify: Matrify is a cloud-based database platform that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It offers features like drag-and-drop interface, data modeling tools, workflow automation, and integration with other platforms. Pros of Matrify include user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness, while cons include limited customization options compared to FileMaker.
  9. TeamDesk: TeamDesk is an online database platform that allows users to create custom business applications without coding. Key features include customizable databases, workflow automation, reporting tools, and integration with other services. Pros of TeamDesk include scalability and flexibility, while cons include potential limitations in designing complex applications.
  10. Stacker: Stacker is a no-code platform that enables users to create custom apps on top of their existing databases. It offers features like drag-and-drop interface, customizable app templates, automation tools, and integration with popular services. Pros of Stacker include ease of use and seamless integration with existing databases, while cons include limited customization options for advanced applications.

Top Alternatives to FileMaker

  • Google App Maker
    Google App Maker

    App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way. ...

  • MySQL
    MySQL

    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software. ...

  • Airtable
    Airtable

    Working with Airtable is as fast and easy as editing a spreadsheet. But only Airtable is backed by the power of a full database, giving you rich features far beyond what a spreadsheet can offer. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

  • PHP
    PHP

    Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...

FileMaker alternatives & related posts

Google App Maker logo

Google App Maker

177
0
Low-code application development for G Suite
177
0
PROS OF GOOGLE APP MAKER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF GOOGLE APP MAKER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Google App Maker posts

      MySQL logo

      MySQL

      128.1K
      3.8K
      The world's most popular open source database
      128.1K
      3.8K
      PROS OF MYSQL
      • 800
        Sql
      • 679
        Free
      • 562
        Easy
      • 528
        Widely used
      • 490
        Open source
      • 180
        High availability
      • 160
        Cross-platform support
      • 104
        Great community
      • 79
        Secure
      • 75
        Full-text indexing and searching
      • 26
        Fast, open, available
      • 16
        Reliable
      • 16
        SSL support
      • 15
        Robust
      • 9
        Enterprise Version
      • 7
        Easy to set up on all platforms
      • 3
        NoSQL access to JSON data type
      • 1
        Relational database
      • 1
        Easy, light, scalable
      • 1
        Sequel Pro (best SQL GUI)
      • 1
        Replica Support
      CONS OF MYSQL
      • 16
        Owned by a company with their own agenda
      • 3
        Can't roll back schema changes

      related MySQL posts

      Nick Rockwell
      SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.4M views

      When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

      So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

      React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

      Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

      See more

      Hello, I am building a website for a school that's used by students to find Zoom meeting links, view their marks, and check course materials. It is also used by the teachers to put the meeting links, students' marks, and course materials.

      I created a similar website using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL. Now I want to implement this project using some frameworks: Next.js, ExpressJS and use PostgreSQL instead of MYSQL

      I want to have some advice on whether these are enough to implement my project.

      See more
      Airtable logo

      Airtable

      1K
      40
      Real-time spreadsheet-database hybrid
      1K
      40
      PROS OF AIRTABLE
      • 19
        Powerful and easy to use
      • 8
        Robust and dynamic
      • 6
        Quick UI Layer
      • 4
        Practical built in views
      • 3
        Robust API documentation
      • 0
        Great flexibility
      CONS OF AIRTABLE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Airtable posts

        Jason Barry
        Cofounder at FeaturePeek · | 10 upvotes · 358.1K views

        If you're a developer using Google Docs or Google Sheets... just stop. There are much better alternatives these days that provide a better user and developer experience.

        At FeaturePeek, we use slite for our internal documents and knowledge tracking. Slite's look and feel is similar to Slack's, so if you use Slack, you'll feel right at home. Slite is great for keeping tabs on meeting notes, internal documentation, drafting marketing content, writing pitches... any long-form text writing that we do as a company happens in Slite. I'm able to be up-to-date with everyone on my team by viewing our team activity. I feel more organized using Slite as opposed to GDocs or GDrive.

        Airtable is also absolutely killer – you'll never want to use Google Sheets again. Have you noticed that with most spreadsheet apps, if you have a tall or wide cell, your screen jumps all over the place when you scroll? With Airtable, you can scroll by screen pixels instead of by spreadsheet cells – this makes a huge difference! It's one of those things that you don't really notice at first, but once you do, you can't go back. This is just one example of the UX improvements that Airtable has to the previous generation of spreadsheet apps – there are plenty more.

        Also, their API is a breeze to use. If you're logged in, the docs fill in values from your tables and account, so it feels personalized to you.

        See more

        I would like to build a community-based customer review platform for a niche industry where users can sign up for a forum, as well as post detailed reviews of their experience with a company/product, including a rating system for pre-selected features. Something like niche.com or areavibes.com with curated information/data, ratings, reviews, and comparison functionalities.

        Is this possible to build using no-code tools? I have read about the possibility of using Webflow with Memberstack, Airtable, and Elfsight through Zapier / Integromat, which may allow for good design and functionality. Is it possible with Bubble or Bildr?

        I have no problems with a bit of a learning curve as long as what I want is possible. Since I have 0 coding experience, I am not sure how to go about it.

        Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

        See more
        JavaScript logo

        JavaScript

        370.8K
        8.1K
        Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
        370.8K
        8.1K
        PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
        • 1.7K
          Can be used on frontend/backend
        • 1.5K
          It's everywhere
        • 1.2K
          Lots of great frameworks
        • 899
          Fast
        • 746
          Light weight
        • 425
          Flexible
        • 392
          You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
        • 286
          Non-blocking i/o
        • 237
          Ubiquitousness
        • 191
          Expressive
        • 55
          Extended functionality to web pages
        • 49
          Relatively easy language
        • 46
          Executed on the client side
        • 30
          Relatively fast to the end user
        • 25
          Pure Javascript
        • 21
          Functional programming
        • 15
          Async
        • 13
          Full-stack
        • 12
          Its everywhere
        • 12
          Future Language of The Web
        • 12
          Setup is easy
        • 11
          JavaScript is the New PHP
        • 11
          Because I love functions
        • 10
          Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
        • 9
          Everyone use it
        • 9
          Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
        • 9
          Easy
        • 9
          Expansive community
        • 8
          For the good parts
        • 8
          Easy to hire developers
        • 8
          No need to use PHP
        • 8
          Most Popular Language in the World
        • 8
          Powerful
        • 8
          Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
        • 7
          It's fun
        • 7
          Its fun and fast
        • 7
          Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
        • 7
          Agile, packages simple to use
        • 7
          Supports lambdas and closures
        • 7
          Love-hate relationship
        • 7
          Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
        • 7
          Evolution of C
        • 7
          Hard not to use
        • 7
          Versitile
        • 7
          Nice
        • 6
          Easy to make something
        • 6
          Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
        • 6
          1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
        • 6
          Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
        • 6
          It let's me use Babel & Typescript
        • 5
          Clojurescript
        • 5
          Everywhere
        • 5
          Scope manipulation
        • 5
          Function expressions are useful for callbacks
        • 5
          Stockholm Syndrome
        • 5
          Promise relationship
        • 5
          Client processing
        • 5
          What to add
        • 4
          Because it is so simple and lightweight
        • 4
          Only Programming language on browser
        • 1
          Subskill #4
        • 1
          Test2
        • 1
          Easy to understand
        • 1
          Not the best
        • 1
          Easy to learn
        • 1
          Hard to learn
        • 1
          Easy to learn and test
        • 1
          Love it
        • 1
          Test
        • 0
          Hard 彤
        CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
        • 22
          A constant moving target, too much churn
        • 20
          Horribly inconsistent
        • 15
          Javascript is the New PHP
        • 9
          No ability to monitor memory utilitization
        • 8
          Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
        • 7
          Thinks strange results are better than errors
        • 6
          Can be ugly
        • 3
          No GitHub
        • 2
          Slow
        • 0
          HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

        related JavaScript posts

        Zach Holman

        Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

        But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

        But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

        Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

        See more
        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

        How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

        Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

        Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

        https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

        (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

        Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

        See more
        Python logo

        Python

        250.1K
        6.9K
        A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
        250.1K
        6.9K
        PROS OF PYTHON
        • 1.2K
          Great libraries
        • 965
          Readable code
        • 848
          Beautiful code
        • 789
          Rapid development
        • 692
          Large community
        • 439
          Open source
        • 394
          Elegant
        • 283
          Great community
        • 274
          Object oriented
        • 222
          Dynamic typing
        • 78
          Great standard library
        • 62
          Very fast
        • 56
          Functional programming
        • 52
          Easy to learn
        • 47
          Scientific computing
        • 36
          Great documentation
        • 30
          Productivity
        • 29
          Matlab alternative
        • 29
          Easy to read
        • 25
          Simple is better than complex
        • 21
          It's the way I think
        • 20
          Imperative
        • 19
          Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
        • 19
          Free
        • 17
          Powerfull language
        • 17
          Machine learning support
        • 16
          Fast and simple
        • 14
          Scripting
        • 12
          Explicit is better than implicit
        • 11
          Ease of development
        • 10
          Clear and easy and powerfull
        • 9
          Unlimited power
        • 8
          It's lean and fun to code
        • 8
          Import antigravity
        • 7
          Print "life is short, use python"
        • 7
          Python has great libraries for data processing
        • 6
          Although practicality beats purity
        • 6
          Fast coding and good for competitions
        • 6
          There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
        • 6
          High Documented language
        • 6
          Readability counts
        • 6
          Rapid Prototyping
        • 6
          I love snakes
        • 6
          Now is better than never
        • 6
          Flat is better than nested
        • 6
          Great for tooling
        • 5
          Great for analytics
        • 5
          Web scraping
        • 5
          Lists, tuples, dictionaries
        • 4
          Complex is better than complicated
        • 4
          Socially engaged community
        • 4
          Plotting
        • 4
          Beautiful is better than ugly
        • 4
          Easy to learn and use
        • 4
          Easy to setup and run smooth
        • 4
          Simple and easy to learn
        • 4
          Multiple Inheritence
        • 4
          CG industry needs
        • 3
          List comprehensions
        • 3
          Powerful language for AI
        • 3
          Flexible and easy
        • 3
          It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
        • 3
          Many types of collections
        • 3
          If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
        • 3
          If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
        • 3
          Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
        • 3
          Pip install everything
        • 3
          No cruft
        • 3
          Generators
        • 3
          Import this
        • 2
          Can understand easily who are new to programming
        • 2
          Securit
        • 2
          Should START with this but not STICK with This
        • 2
          A-to-Z
        • 2
          Because of Netflix
        • 2
          Only one way to do it
        • 2
          Better outcome
        • 2
          Good for hacking
        • 2
          Batteries included
        • 2
          Procedural programming
        • 1
          Sexy af
        • 1
          Automation friendly
        • 1
          Slow
        • 1
          Best friend for NLP
        • 0
          Powerful
        • 0
          Keep it simple
        • 0
          Ni
        CONS OF PYTHON
        • 53
          Still divided between python 2 and python 3
        • 28
          Performance impact
        • 26
          Poor syntax for anonymous functions
        • 22
          GIL
        • 19
          Package management is a mess
        • 14
          Too imperative-oriented
        • 12
          Hard to understand
        • 12
          Dynamic typing
        • 12
          Very slow
        • 8
          Indentations matter a lot
        • 8
          Not everything is expression
        • 7
          Incredibly slow
        • 7
          Explicit self parameter in methods
        • 6
          Requires C functions for dynamic modules
        • 6
          Poor DSL capabilities
        • 6
          No anonymous functions
        • 5
          Fake object-oriented programming
        • 5
          Threading
        • 5
          The "lisp style" whitespaces
        • 5
          Official documentation is unclear.
        • 5
          Hard to obfuscate
        • 5
          Circular import
        • 4
          Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
        • 4
          The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
        • 4
          Not suitable for autocomplete
        • 2
          Meta classes
        • 1
          Training wheels (forced indentation)

        related Python posts

        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

        How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

        Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

        Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

        https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

        (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

        Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

        Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

        It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

        I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

        What do you think about TensorFlow?

        Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

        See more
        Node.js logo

        Node.js

        192.8K
        8.5K
        A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
        192.8K
        8.5K
        PROS OF NODE.JS
        • 1.4K
          Npm
        • 1.3K
          Javascript
        • 1.1K
          Great libraries
        • 1K
          High-performance
        • 805
          Open source
        • 487
          Great for apis
        • 477
          Asynchronous
        • 425
          Great community
        • 390
          Great for realtime apps
        • 296
          Great for command line utilities
        • 86
          Websockets
        • 84
          Node Modules
        • 69
          Uber Simple
        • 59
          Great modularity
        • 58
          Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
        • 42
          Easy to start
        • 35
          Great for Data Streaming
        • 32
          Realtime
        • 28
          Awesome
        • 25
          Non blocking IO
        • 18
          Can be used as a proxy
        • 17
          High performance, open source, scalable
        • 16
          Non-blocking and modular
        • 15
          Easy and Fun
        • 14
          Easy and powerful
        • 13
          Future of BackEnd
        • 13
          Same lang as AngularJS
        • 12
          Fullstack
        • 11
          Fast
        • 10
          Scalability
        • 10
          Cross platform
        • 9
          Simple
        • 8
          Mean Stack
        • 7
          Great for webapps
        • 7
          Easy concurrency
        • 6
          Typescript
        • 6
          Fast, simple code and async
        • 6
          React
        • 6
          Friendly
        • 5
          Control everything
        • 5
          Its amazingly fast and scalable
        • 5
          Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
        • 5
          Scalable
        • 5
          Great speed
        • 5
          Fast development
        • 4
          It's fast
        • 4
          Easy to use
        • 4
          Isomorphic coolness
        • 3
          Great community
        • 3
          Not Python
        • 3
          Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
        • 3
          TypeScript Support
        • 3
          Blazing fast
        • 3
          Performant and fast prototyping
        • 3
          Easy to learn
        • 3
          Easy
        • 3
          Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
        • 3
          One language, end-to-end
        • 3
          Less boilerplate code
        • 2
          Npm i ape-updating
        • 2
          Event Driven
        • 2
          Lovely
        • 1
          Creat for apis
        • 0
          Node
        CONS OF NODE.JS
        • 46
          Bound to a single CPU
        • 45
          New framework every day
        • 40
          Lots of terrible examples on the internet
        • 33
          Asynchronous programming is the worst
        • 24
          Callback
        • 19
          Javascript
        • 11
          Dependency hell
        • 11
          Dependency based on GitHub
        • 10
          Low computational power
        • 7
          Very very Slow
        • 7
          Can block whole server easily
        • 7
          Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
        • 4
          Breaking updates
        • 4
          Unstable
        • 3
          Unneeded over complication
        • 3
          No standard approach
        • 1
          Bad transitive dependency management
        • 1
          Can't read server session

        related Node.js posts

        Anurag Maurya

        Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

        Hello community,

        I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

        I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

        Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

        I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

        For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

        1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

        2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

        3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

        See more
        HTML5 logo

        HTML5

        153K
        2.2K
        5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
        153K
        2.2K
        PROS OF HTML5
        • 448
          New doctype
        • 389
          Local storage
        • 334
          Canvas
        • 285
          Semantic header and footer
        • 240
          Video element
        • 121
          Geolocation
        • 106
          Form autofocus
        • 100
          Email inputs
        • 85
          Editable content
        • 79
          Application caches
        • 10
          Easy to use
        • 9
          Cleaner Code
        • 5
          Easy
        • 4
          Websockets
        • 4
          Semantical
        • 3
          Audio element
        • 3
          Content focused
        • 3
          Better
        • 3
          Modern
        • 2
          Compatible
        • 2
          Very easy to learning to HTML
        • 2
          Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
        • 2
          Portability
        CONS OF HTML5
        • 2
          Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
        • 1
          Long and winding code

        related HTML5 posts

        Shared insights
        on
        MySQLMySQLPHPPHPJavaScriptJavaScriptHTML5HTML5

        Hey guys, I need some advice on one thing. Currently, I am a fresher and know HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, PHP and, MySQL. Recently I got a client project through one of my friends and he wants me to build an E-learning Management System. Are these skills enough to build an LMS website?

        Thanks in advance!! ;)

        See more
        Jan Vlnas
        Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 480.3K views
        Shared insights
        on
        HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

        Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

        See more
        PHP logo

        PHP

        146.3K
        4.6K
        A popular general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development
        146.3K
        4.6K
        PROS OF PHP
        • 954
          Large community
        • 820
          Open source
        • 767
          Easy deployment
        • 487
          Great frameworks
        • 387
          The best glue on the web
        • 235
          Continual improvements
        • 185
          Good old web
        • 145
          Web foundation
        • 135
          Community packages
        • 125
          Tool support
        • 35
          Used by wordpress
        • 34
          Excellent documentation
        • 29
          Used by Facebook
        • 23
          Because of Symfony
        • 21
          Dynamic Language
        • 17
          Easy to learn
        • 17
          Cheap hosting
        • 15
          Very powerful web language
        • 14
          Awesome Language and easy to implement
        • 14
          Fast development
        • 14
          Because of Laravel
        • 13
          Composer
        • 12
          Flexibility, syntax, extensibility
        • 9
          Easiest deployment
        • 8
          Readable Code
        • 8
          Fast
        • 7
          Most of the web uses it
        • 7
          Short development lead times
        • 7
          Worst popularity quality ratio
        • 7
          Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments
        • 6
          Faster then ever
        • 6
          Simple, flexible yet Scalable
        • 5
          Open source and large community
        • 4
          Easy to use and learn
        • 4
          Great developer experience
        • 4
          Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)
        • 4
          Is like one zip of air
        • 4
          Open source and great framework
        • 4
          Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework
        • 4
          Cheap to own
        • 4
          Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks
        • 4
          I have no choice :(
        • 2
          Hard not to use
        • 2
          Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps
        • 2
          Interpreted at the run time
        • 2
          Walk away
        • 2
          FFI
        • 2
          Safe the planet
        • 2
          Used by STOMT
        • 2
          Fault tolerance
        • 1
          Simplesaml
        • 1
          Secure
        • 1
          It can get you a lamborghini
        • 1
          Bando
        • 0
          Secure
        • 0
          Largr community
        CONS OF PHP
        • 21
          So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find
        • 16
          Inconsistent API
        • 8
          Fragmented community
        • 6
          Not secure
        • 3
          No routing system
        • 3
          Hard to debug
        • 2
          Old

        related PHP posts

        Nick Rockwell
        SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.4M views

        When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

        So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

        React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

        Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

        See more

        Hello, I am building a website for a school that's used by students to find Zoom meeting links, view their marks, and check course materials. It is also used by the teachers to put the meeting links, students' marks, and course materials.

        I created a similar website using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL. Now I want to implement this project using some frameworks: Next.js, ExpressJS and use PostgreSQL instead of MYSQL

        I want to have some advice on whether these are enough to implement my project.

        See more