Alternatives to JHipster logo

Alternatives to JHipster

Spring Boot, Grails, Django, Yeoman, and CUBA Platform are the most popular alternatives and competitors to JHipster.
153
228
+ 1
0

What is JHipster and what are its top alternatives?

It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.
JHipster is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.
JHipster is an open source tool with 18.3K GitHub stars and 3.6K GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to JHipster's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to JHipster

  • Spring Boot

    Spring Boot

    Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration. ...

  • Grails

    Grails

    Grails is a framework used to build web applications with the Groovy programming language. The core framework is very extensible and there are numerous plugins available that provide easy integration of add-on features. ...

  • Django

    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • Yeoman

    Yeoman

    Yeoman is a robust and opinionated set of tools, libraries, and a workflow that can help developers quickly build beautiful, compelling web apps. It is comprised of yo - a scaffolding tool using our generator system, grunt - a task runner for your build process and bower for dependency management. ...

  • CUBA Platform

    CUBA Platform

    It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development. ...

  • Node.js

    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • ASP.NET

    ASP.NET

    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications. ...

  • Laravel

    Laravel

    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching. ...

JHipster alternatives & related posts

Spring Boot logo

Spring Boot

14.9K
12.8K
871
Create Spring-powered, production-grade applications and services with absolute minimum fuss
14.9K
12.8K
+ 1
871
PROS OF SPRING BOOT
  • 130
    Powerful and handy
  • 122
    Easy setup
  • 114
    Java
  • 84
    Spring
  • 80
    Fast
  • 40
    Extensible
  • 33
    Lots of "off the shelf" functionalities
  • 28
    Cloud Solid
  • 22
    Caches well
  • 20
    Many receipes around for obscure features
  • 19
    Modular
  • 19
    Productive
  • 18
    Integrations with most other Java frameworks
  • 17
    Spring ecosystem is great
  • 17
    Fast Performance With Microservices
  • 15
    Community
  • 14
    Auto-configuration
  • 12
    Easy setup, Community Support, Solid for ERP apps
  • 12
    One-stop shop
  • 11
    Cross-platform
  • 11
    Easy to parallelize
  • 10
    Easy setup, good for build erp systems, well documented
  • 10
    Powerful 3rd party libraries and frameworks
  • 9
    Easy setup, Git Integration
  • 2
    Kotlin
  • 2
    It's so easier to start a project on spring
CONS OF SPRING BOOT
  • 18
    Heavy weight
  • 17
    Annotation ceremony
  • 10
    Many config files needed
  • 8
    Java
  • 5
    Reactive
  • 4
    Excellent tools for cloud hosting, since 5.x

related Spring Boot posts

Praveen Mooli
Engineering Manager at Taylor and Francis | 14 upvotes 路 1.7M views

We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.

To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following: 1. #Microservices - Java with Spring Boot , Node.js with ExpressJS and Python with Flask 2. #Eventsourcingframework - Amazon Kinesis , Amazon Kinesis Firehose , Amazon SNS , Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda 3. #Data - Amazon RDS , Amazon DynamoDB , Amazon S3 , MongoDB Atlas

To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular 2 with RxJS

#Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless

See more

Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

See more
Grails logo

Grails

328
295
328
An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM
328
295
+ 1
328
PROS OF GRAILS
  • 55
    Groovy
  • 39
    Jvm
  • 38
    Rapid development
  • 37
    Gorm
  • 29
    Web framework
  • 24
    Open source
  • 21
    Plugins
  • 17
    Extensible
  • 16
    Easy
  • 14
    Dynamic
  • 6
    Clean architecture (Dependency Injection)
  • 6
    Gradle
  • 5
    Clear what everything does, lots of options
  • 4
    RAD
  • 4
    Great documentation
  • 4
    Agile
  • 3
    Android
  • 3
    Spring
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Java web apps with steroid
CONS OF GRAILS
  • 3
    Frequent breaking changes
  • 2
    Undocumented features

related Grails posts

Alex A

Some may wonder why did we choose Grails ? Really good question :) We spent quite some time to evaluate what framework to go with and the battle was between Play Scala and Grails ( Groovy ). We have enough experience with both and, to be honest, I absolutely in love with Scala; however, the tipping point for us was the potential speed of development. Grails allows much faster development pace than Play , and as of right now this is the most important parameter. We might convert later though. Also, worth mentioning, by default Grails comes with Gradle as a build tool, so why change?

See more
Django logo

Django

23.3K
20.1K
3.5K
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
23.3K
20.1K
+ 1
3.5K
PROS OF DJANGO
  • 610
    Rapid development
  • 453
    Open source
  • 390
    Great community
  • 339
    Easy to learn
  • 252
    Mvc
  • 205
    Beautiful code
  • 204
    Elegant
  • 183
    Free
  • 182
    Great packages
  • 169
    Great libraries
  • 59
    Restful
  • 56
    Powerful
  • 54
    Comes with auth and crud admin panel
  • 51
    Great documentation
  • 48
    Great for web
  • 38
    Python
  • 33
    Great orm
  • 28
    Great for api
  • 22
    All included
  • 18
    Web Apps
  • 17
    Fast
  • 14
    Used by top startups
  • 12
    Clean
  • 11
    Easy setup
  • 10
    Sexy
  • 8
    Convention over configuration
  • 5
    Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
  • 5
    ORM
  • 5
    The Django community
  • 3
    Its elegant and practical
  • 3
    Great MVC and templating engine
  • 3
    Mvt
  • 2
    Easy
  • 2
    Cross-Platform
  • 2
    Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
  • 2
    Full stack
  • 2
    Batteries included
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Have not found anything that it can't do
  • 2
    Fast prototyping
  • 2
    Easy to develop end to end AI Models
  • 1
    Zero code burden to change databases
  • 1
    Full-Text Search
  • 1
    Map
  • 1
    Scaffold
  • 1
    Modular
  • 1
    King of backend world
  • 1
    Very quick to get something up and running
  • 1
    Great peformance
  • 1
    Many libraries
  • 1
    Just the right level of abstraction
  • 1
    Python community
CONS OF DJANGO
  • 24
    Underpowered templating
  • 19
    Underpowered ORM
  • 18
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
  • 7
    Admin
  • 7
    Not nodejs
  • 6
    Configuration hell
  • 3
    Python
  • 3
    Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
  • 2
    Not typed
  • 2
    Bloated admin panel included
  • 2
    Overwhelming folder structure
  • 1
    InEffective Multithreading

related Django posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It鈥檚 worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren鈥檛 running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we鈥檇 go with Ember.js.

However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

See more

Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

See more
Yeoman logo

Yeoman

1.6K
1.2K
396
A set of tools for automating development workflow
1.6K
1.2K
+ 1
396
PROS OF YEOMAN
  • 121
    Lightning-fast scaffolding
  • 83
    Automation
  • 78
    Great build process
  • 57
    Open source
  • 49
    Yo
  • 8
    Unit Testing
CONS OF YEOMAN
  • 1
    Even harder to debug than Javascript

related Yeoman posts

CUBA Platform logo

CUBA Platform

4
17
0
A full stack Java framework and components for business applications
4
17
+ 1
0
PROS OF CUBA PLATFORM
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF CUBA PLATFORM
      Be the first to leave a con

      related CUBA Platform posts

      Node.js logo

      Node.js

      106.1K
      86.1K
      8.3K
      A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
      106.1K
      86.1K
      + 1
      8.3K
      PROS OF NODE.JS
      • 1.4K
        Npm
      • 1.3K
        Javascript
      • 1.1K
        Great libraries
      • 1K
        High-performance
      • 789
        Open source
      • 479
        Great for apis
      • 468
        Asynchronous
      • 415
        Great community
      • 386
        Great for realtime apps
      • 291
        Great for command line utilities
      • 78
        Node Modules
      • 75
        Websockets
      • 65
        Uber Simple
      • 53
        Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
      • 53
        Great modularity
      • 38
        Easy to start
      • 33
        Great for Data Streaming
      • 29
        Realtime
      • 25
        Awesome
      • 23
        Non blocking IO
      • 16
        Can be used as a proxy
      • 15
        High performance, open source, scalable
      • 14
        Non-blocking and modular
      • 13
        Easy and Fun
      • 12
        Same lang as AngularJS
      • 11
        Easy and powerful
      • 10
        Future of BackEnd
      • 9
        Fast
      • 8
        Scalability
      • 8
        Cross platform
      • 8
        Fullstack
      • 7
        Mean Stack
      • 7
        Simple
      • 5
        Easy concurrency
      • 5
        Great for webapps
      • 5
        React
      • 4
        Friendly
      • 4
        Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
      • 4
        Typescript
      • 4
        Fast, simple code and async
      • 3
        Its amazingly fast and scalable
      • 3
        Scalable
      • 3
        Great speed
      • 3
        Fast development
      • 3
        Isomorphic coolness
      • 3
        Control everything
      • 2
        It's fast
      • 2
        Not Python
      • 2
        Blazing fast
      • 2
        One language, end-to-end
      • 2
        TypeScript Support
      • 2
        Easy to learn
      • 2
        Javascript2
      • 2
        Easy to use
      • 2
        Less boilerplate code
      • 2
        Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
      • 2
        Great community
      • 2
        Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
      • 2
        Performant and fast prototyping
      • 1
        Easy
      • 1
        Lovely
      • 0
        Event Driven
      CONS OF NODE.JS
      • 46
        Bound to a single CPU
      • 39
        New framework every day
      • 34
        Lots of terrible examples on the internet
      • 28
        Asynchronous programming is the worst
      • 22
        Callback
      • 16
        Javascript
      • 11
        Dependency based on GitHub
      • 10
        Low computational power
      • 10
        Dependency hell
      • 7
        Can block whole server easily
      • 6
        Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
      • 6
        Very very Slow
      • 3
        Breaking updates
      • 3
        Unneeded over complication
      • 3
        Unstable
      • 1
        No standard approach

      related Node.js posts

      Nick Rockwell
      SVP, Engineering at Fastly | 42 upvotes 路 1.5M views

      When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

      So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

      React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

      Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

      See more
      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber | 37 upvotes 路 3.6M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      ASP.NET logo

      ASP.NET

      19.7K
      5.3K
      6
      An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
      19.7K
      5.3K
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF ASP.NET
      • 6
        Great mvc
      CONS OF ASP.NET
        Be the first to leave a con

        related ASP.NET posts

        Greg Neumann

        Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

        This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

        But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

        I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

        Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

        See more

        I found Heroku to be a great option to get ExpressJS up and running with very little hustle. The free tier is great, but I'd recommend to set up a cronjob to visit your site every few minutes so that the server stays awake. Netlify was the option to host the front-end because doing the server side rendering on #Heroku would have taken a little more time than I'd like to. For the moment pre-rendering the app with prerender-spa-plugin is enough to help with #seo. Puppeteer was my choice over other options because it made it easier to scrape websites made on ASP.NET which is what I needed in this case. And Vue.js is my top choice at the moment because it's really beginner friendly and it has a lot of the features I like about Angular 2 and React. vuex is a must in most of the app I build.

        See more
        Laravel logo

        Laravel

        18.1K
        14.1K
        3.4K
        A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
        18.1K
        14.1K
        + 1
        3.4K
        PROS OF LARAVEL
        • 502
          Clean architecture
        • 361
          Growing community
        • 337
          Composer friendly
        • 313
          Open source
        • 293
          The only framework to consider for php
        • 194
          Mvc
        • 189
          Quickly develop
        • 155
          Dependency injection
        • 142
          Application architecture
        • 129
          Embraces good community packages
        • 57
          Write less, do more
        • 50
          Restful routing
        • 46
          Orm (eloquent)
        • 43
          Artisan scaffolding and migrations
        • 42
          Database migrations & seeds
        • 35
          Awesome
        • 33
          Great documentation
        • 25
          Promotes elegant coding
        • 25
          Awsome, Powerfull, Fast and Rapid
        • 24
          Build Apps faster, easier and better
        • 22
          JSON friendly
        • 21
          Most easy for me
        • 20
          Eloquent ORM
        • 20
          Easy to learn, scalability
        • 19
          Modern PHP
        • 19
          Test-Driven
        • 18
          Beautiful
        • 18
          Blade Template
        • 13
          Security
        • 11
          Clean Documentation
        • 10
          Based on SOLID
        • 10
          Convention over Configuration
        • 10
          Cool
        • 9
          Simple
        • 9
          Easy to attach Middleware
        • 8
          Get going quickly straight out of the box. BYOKDM
        • 8
          Easy to use
        • 8
          Laravel + Cassandra = Killer Framework
        • 8
          Easy Request Validatin
        • 8
          Simpler
        • 8
          Fast
        • 7
          Simplistic , easy and faster
        • 7
          Less dependencies
        • 7
          Its just wow
        • 6
          Super easy and powerful
        • 6
          Friendly API
        • 5
          Great customer support
        • 5
          Its beautiful to code in
        • 4
          Easy
        • 4
          Active Record
        • 4
          Fast and Clarify framework
        • 4
          Php7
        • 4
          The only "cons" is wrong! No static method just Facades
        • 4
          Speed
        • 3
          Laragon
        • 3
          Eloquent
        • 3
          Composer
        • 3
          Easy views handling and great ORM
        • 3
          Minimum system requirements
        • 3
          Laravel Mix
        • 2
          Ease of use
        • 2
          Cashier with Braintree and Stripe
        • 2
          Laravel Spark
        • 2
          Laravel Passport
        • 2
          Laravel Nova
        • 2
          Laravel casher
        • 2
          Intuitive usage
        • 2
          Laravel Horizon and Telescope
        • 2
          Laravel Forge and Envoy
        • 1
          Touch heart artisan
        • 1
          Rapid development
        • 1
          Heart touch
        • 1
          Like heart beat
        • 1
          Laravel love live long
        • 0
          Scout
        CONS OF LARAVEL
        • 40
          PHP
        • 26
          Too many dependency
        • 19
          Slower than the other two
        • 15
          A lot of static method calls for convenience
        • 13
          Too many include
        • 10
          Heavy
        • 7
          Bloated
        • 6
          Laravel
        • 5
          Confusing
        • 4
          Does not work well for file uploads in Shared Hosting
        • 3
          Too underrated
        • 2
          Not fast with MongoDB
        • 1
          Difficult to learn
        • 1
          Not using SOLID principles

        related Laravel posts

        Antonio Sanchez

        Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

        Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

        By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

        Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

        There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

        We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

        As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

        See more
        CDG

        I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

        Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

        As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

        To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

        CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

        Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

        See more