Alternatives to Jtwig logo

Alternatives to Jtwig

Thymeleaf, Apache FreeMarker, Twig, JavaScript, and Python are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Jtwig.
3
6
+ 1
0

What is Jtwig and what are its top alternatives?

Jtwig is a modern and flexible template engine for Java applications. It provides a powerful templating language that allows for dynamic content generation and supports various features such as macro definitions, template inheritance, and conditional statements. However, one limitation of Jtwig is its lack of widespread adoption compared to other popular template engines in the Java ecosystem.

  1. Thymeleaf: Thymeleaf is a popular Java template engine that offers a natural template design and is highly extensible. It provides support for HTML, XML, and other formats, making it versatile for various web applications. Pros include easy integration with Spring frameworks, while cons include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  2. FreeMarker: FreeMarker is a powerful template engine that supports easy integration with Java applications for dynamic content generation. It offers features such as template caching and macro support. Pros include high performance and flexibility, while cons include a more verbose syntax compared to other template engines.
  3. Velocity: Velocity is a lightweight and fast template engine for Java applications that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It is widely used in various projects and provides support for features like macros and conditional statements. Pros include a simple syntax, while cons include limited support for newer template engine features.
  4. Pebble: Pebble is a modern Java template engine inspired by Twig. It offers a clean and concise syntax for template design and supports features like template inheritance and macros. Pros include high performance and extensibility, while cons include a smaller community compared to other established template engines.
  5. Beetl: Beetl is a fast and feature-rich template engine for Java applications that offers a robust set of features such as template caching and text processing. It provides a simple and flexible syntax for template design. Pros include high performance and strong integration with Java projects, while cons include a learning curve for new users.
  6. Handlebars.java: Handlebars.java is a Java port of the popular Handlebars.js template engine. It offers a simple and expressive syntax for creating templates and supports features like helpers and partials. Pros include a familiar syntax for web developers, while cons include limited support for advanced template features.
  7. Groovy Template Engine: The Groovy Template Engine is a robust and flexible template engine for Java applications that leverages the power of Groovy scripting language. It provides features like template inheritance and extensibility through Groovy's dynamic nature. Pros include seamless integration with Groovy projects, while cons include a dependency on Groovy runtime.
  8. Handlebars.java: Mustache is a logic-less template engine that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a minimalistic syntax for creating templates and supports basic logic constructs like loops and conditionals. Pros include a clean and readable syntax, while cons include limited support for complex template operations.
  9. Rocker: Rocker is a fast and efficient Java template engine that relies on a compiled template approach for high performance. It offers a simple syntax for template design and supports features like type-safe templates and helper methods. Pros include high performance and type safety, while cons include a less dynamic template design compared to other engines.
  10. Soy: Soy is a template language developed by Google Closure Templates that focuses on secure and scalable web application development. It provides a safe environment for template execution and offers features like internationalization support and strict data validation. Pros include security and scalability, while cons include a more complex setup process compared to other template engines.

Top Alternatives to Jtwig

  • Thymeleaf
    Thymeleaf

    It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities. ...

  • Apache FreeMarker
    Apache FreeMarker

    It is a "template engine"; a generic tool to generate text output (anything from HTML to auto generated source code) based on templates. It's a Java package, a class library for Java programmers. ...

  • Twig
    Twig

    It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

  • PHP
    PHP

    Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...

Jtwig alternatives & related posts

Thymeleaf logo

Thymeleaf

203
4
A template engine for Java
203
4
PROS OF THYMELEAF
  • 4
    Its delicous
CONS OF THYMELEAF
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Thymeleaf posts

    I am consulting for a company that wants to move its current CubeCart e-commerce site to another PHP based platform like PrestaShop or Magento. I was interested in alternatives that utilize Node.js as the primary platform. I currently don't know PHP, but I have done full stack dev with Java, Spring, Thymeleaf, etc.. I am just unsure that learning a set of technologies not commonly used makes sense. For example, in PrestaShop, I would need to work with JavaScript better and learn PHP, Twig, and Bootstrap. It seems more cumbersome than a Node JS system, where the language syntax stays the same for the full stack. I am looking for thoughts and advice on the relevance of PHP skillset into the future AND whether the Node based e-commerce open source options can compete with Magento or Prestashop.

    See more
    Остап Комплікевич

    I need some advice to choose an engine for generation web pages from the Spring Boot app. Which technology is the best solution today? 1) JSP + JSTL 2) Apache FreeMarker 3) Thymeleaf Or you can suggest even other perspective tools. I am using Spring Boot, Spring Web, Spring Data, Spring Security, PostgreSQL, Apache Tomcat in my project. I have already tried to generate pages using jsp, jstl, and it went well. However, I had huge problems via carrying already created static pages, to jsp format, because of syntax. Thanks.

    See more
    Apache FreeMarker logo

    Apache FreeMarker

    278
    0
    A free Java-based template engine
    278
    0
    PROS OF APACHE FREEMARKER
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF APACHE FREEMARKER
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Apache FreeMarker posts

        Остап Комплікевич

        I need some advice to choose an engine for generation web pages from the Spring Boot app. Which technology is the best solution today? 1) JSP + JSTL 2) Apache FreeMarker 3) Thymeleaf Or you can suggest even other perspective tools. I am using Spring Boot, Spring Web, Spring Data, Spring Security, PostgreSQL, Apache Tomcat in my project. I have already tried to generate pages using jsp, jstl, and it went well. However, I had huge problems via carrying already created static pages, to jsp format, because of syntax. Thanks.

        See more
        Twig logo

        Twig

        307
        8
        A flexible, fast, and secure template engine
        307
        8
        PROS OF TWIG
        • 2
          For both nodejs and php
        • 2
          Gulp
        • 2
          Native html, xml, txt etc
        • 2
          Front to back with no efforts
        CONS OF TWIG
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Twig posts

          I am consulting for a company that wants to move its current CubeCart e-commerce site to another PHP based platform like PrestaShop or Magento. I was interested in alternatives that utilize Node.js as the primary platform. I currently don't know PHP, but I have done full stack dev with Java, Spring, Thymeleaf, etc.. I am just unsure that learning a set of technologies not commonly used makes sense. For example, in PrestaShop, I would need to work with JavaScript better and learn PHP, Twig, and Bootstrap. It seems more cumbersome than a Node JS system, where the language syntax stays the same for the full stack. I am looking for thoughts and advice on the relevance of PHP skillset into the future AND whether the Node based e-commerce open source options can compete with Magento or Prestashop.

          See more
          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          361.1K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          361.1K
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 898
            Fast
          • 746
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 237
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Future Language of The Web
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Easy
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 9
            Everyone use it
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            Powerful
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 7
            Its fun and fast
          • 7
            It's fun
          • 7
            Nice
          • 7
            Versitile
          • 7
            Hard not to use
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            What to add
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 1
            Easy to learn and test
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Test
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow
          • 0
            HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Python logo

          Python

          245K
          6.9K
          A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
          245K
          6.9K
          PROS OF PYTHON
          • 1.2K
            Great libraries
          • 963
            Readable code
          • 847
            Beautiful code
          • 788
            Rapid development
          • 691
            Large community
          • 438
            Open source
          • 393
            Elegant
          • 282
            Great community
          • 273
            Object oriented
          • 221
            Dynamic typing
          • 77
            Great standard library
          • 60
            Very fast
          • 55
            Functional programming
          • 50
            Easy to learn
          • 46
            Scientific computing
          • 35
            Great documentation
          • 29
            Productivity
          • 28
            Matlab alternative
          • 28
            Easy to read
          • 24
            Simple is better than complex
          • 20
            It's the way I think
          • 19
            Imperative
          • 18
            Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
          • 18
            Free
          • 17
            Machine learning support
          • 17
            Powerfull language
          • 16
            Fast and simple
          • 14
            Scripting
          • 12
            Explicit is better than implicit
          • 11
            Ease of development
          • 10
            Clear and easy and powerfull
          • 9
            Unlimited power
          • 8
            Import antigravity
          • 8
            It's lean and fun to code
          • 7
            Print "life is short, use python"
          • 7
            Python has great libraries for data processing
          • 6
            High Documented language
          • 6
            I love snakes
          • 6
            Readability counts
          • 6
            Rapid Prototyping
          • 6
            Now is better than never
          • 6
            Although practicality beats purity
          • 6
            Flat is better than nested
          • 6
            Great for tooling
          • 6
            There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
          • 6
            Fast coding and good for competitions
          • 5
            Web scraping
          • 5
            Lists, tuples, dictionaries
          • 5
            Great for analytics
          • 4
            Beautiful is better than ugly
          • 4
            Easy to learn and use
          • 4
            Easy to setup and run smooth
          • 4
            Multiple Inheritence
          • 4
            CG industry needs
          • 4
            Socially engaged community
          • 4
            Complex is better than complicated
          • 4
            Plotting
          • 4
            Simple and easy to learn
          • 3
            List comprehensions
          • 3
            Powerful language for AI
          • 3
            Flexible and easy
          • 3
            It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
          • 3
            Many types of collections
          • 3
            If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
          • 3
            If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
          • 3
            Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
          • 3
            Pip install everything
          • 3
            No cruft
          • 3
            Generators
          • 3
            Import this
          • 2
            Batteries included
          • 2
            Securit
          • 2
            Can understand easily who are new to programming
          • 2
            Should START with this but not STICK with This
          • 2
            A-to-Z
          • 2
            Because of Netflix
          • 2
            Only one way to do it
          • 2
            Better outcome
          • 2
            Good for hacking
          • 1
            Best friend for NLP
          • 1
            Sexy af
          • 1
            Procedural programming
          • 1
            Automation friendly
          • 1
            Slow
          • 0
            Keep it simple
          • 0
            Powerful
          • 0
            Ni
          CONS OF PYTHON
          • 53
            Still divided between python 2 and python 3
          • 28
            Performance impact
          • 26
            Poor syntax for anonymous functions
          • 22
            GIL
          • 19
            Package management is a mess
          • 14
            Too imperative-oriented
          • 12
            Hard to understand
          • 12
            Dynamic typing
          • 12
            Very slow
          • 8
            Indentations matter a lot
          • 8
            Not everything is expression
          • 7
            Incredibly slow
          • 7
            Explicit self parameter in methods
          • 6
            Requires C functions for dynamic modules
          • 6
            Poor DSL capabilities
          • 6
            No anonymous functions
          • 5
            Fake object-oriented programming
          • 5
            Threading
          • 5
            The "lisp style" whitespaces
          • 5
            Official documentation is unclear.
          • 5
            Hard to obfuscate
          • 5
            Circular import
          • 4
            Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
          • 4
            The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
          • 4
            Not suitable for autocomplete
          • 2
            Meta classes
          • 1
            Training wheels (forced indentation)

          related Python posts

          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Nick Parsons
          Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 4.3M views

          Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

          We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

          We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

          Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

          #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

          See more
          Node.js logo

          Node.js

          188.7K
          8.5K
          A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
          188.7K
          8.5K
          PROS OF NODE.JS
          • 1.4K
            Npm
          • 1.3K
            Javascript
          • 1.1K
            Great libraries
          • 1K
            High-performance
          • 805
            Open source
          • 486
            Great for apis
          • 477
            Asynchronous
          • 424
            Great community
          • 390
            Great for realtime apps
          • 296
            Great for command line utilities
          • 85
            Websockets
          • 83
            Node Modules
          • 69
            Uber Simple
          • 59
            Great modularity
          • 58
            Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
          • 42
            Easy to start
          • 35
            Great for Data Streaming
          • 32
            Realtime
          • 28
            Awesome
          • 25
            Non blocking IO
          • 18
            Can be used as a proxy
          • 17
            High performance, open source, scalable
          • 16
            Non-blocking and modular
          • 15
            Easy and Fun
          • 14
            Easy and powerful
          • 13
            Future of BackEnd
          • 13
            Same lang as AngularJS
          • 12
            Fullstack
          • 11
            Fast
          • 10
            Scalability
          • 10
            Cross platform
          • 9
            Simple
          • 8
            Mean Stack
          • 7
            Great for webapps
          • 7
            Easy concurrency
          • 6
            Typescript
          • 6
            Fast, simple code and async
          • 6
            React
          • 6
            Friendly
          • 5
            Control everything
          • 5
            Its amazingly fast and scalable
          • 5
            Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
          • 5
            Scalable
          • 5
            Great speed
          • 5
            Fast development
          • 4
            It's fast
          • 4
            Easy to use
          • 4
            Isomorphic coolness
          • 3
            Great community
          • 3
            Not Python
          • 3
            Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
          • 3
            TypeScript Support
          • 3
            Blazing fast
          • 3
            Performant and fast prototyping
          • 3
            Easy to learn
          • 3
            Easy
          • 3
            Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
          • 3
            One language, end-to-end
          • 3
            Less boilerplate code
          • 2
            Npm i ape-updating
          • 2
            Event Driven
          • 2
            Lovely
          • 1
            Creat for apis
          • 0
            Node
          CONS OF NODE.JS
          • 46
            Bound to a single CPU
          • 45
            New framework every day
          • 40
            Lots of terrible examples on the internet
          • 33
            Asynchronous programming is the worst
          • 24
            Callback
          • 19
            Javascript
          • 11
            Dependency hell
          • 11
            Dependency based on GitHub
          • 10
            Low computational power
          • 7
            Very very Slow
          • 7
            Can block whole server easily
          • 7
            Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
          • 4
            Breaking updates
          • 4
            Unstable
          • 3
            Unneeded over complication
          • 3
            No standard approach
          • 1
            Bad transitive dependency management
          • 1
            Can't read server session

          related Node.js posts

          Shared insights
          on
          Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

          I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

          For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

          1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

          2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

          3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

          See more
          Anurag Maurya

          Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

          Hello community,

          I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

          I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

          Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

          See more
          HTML5 logo

          HTML5

          148.8K
          2.2K
          5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
          148.8K
          2.2K
          PROS OF HTML5
          • 447
            New doctype
          • 389
            Local storage
          • 334
            Canvas
          • 285
            Semantic header and footer
          • 240
            Video element
          • 121
            Geolocation
          • 106
            Form autofocus
          • 100
            Email inputs
          • 85
            Editable content
          • 79
            Application caches
          • 10
            Easy to use
          • 9
            Cleaner Code
          • 5
            Easy
          • 4
            Websockets
          • 4
            Semantical
          • 3
            Better
          • 3
            Audio element
          • 3
            Modern
          • 2
            Portability
          • 2
            Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
          • 2
            Content focused
          • 2
            Compatible
          • 1
            Very easy to learning to HTML
          CONS OF HTML5
          • 1
            Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
          • 1
            Long and winding code

          related HTML5 posts

          Jan Vlnas
          Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 400.1K views
          Shared insights
          on
          HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

          Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

          See more
          Jonathan Pugh
          Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect · | 25 upvotes · 3M views

          I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

          For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

          Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

          I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

          I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

          I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

          I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

          For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

          For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

          For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

          I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

          So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

          See more
          PHP logo

          PHP

          144.4K
          4.6K
          A popular general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development
          144.4K
          4.6K
          PROS OF PHP
          • 953
            Large community
          • 819
            Open source
          • 767
            Easy deployment
          • 487
            Great frameworks
          • 387
            The best glue on the web
          • 235
            Continual improvements
          • 185
            Good old web
          • 145
            Web foundation
          • 135
            Community packages
          • 125
            Tool support
          • 35
            Used by wordpress
          • 34
            Excellent documentation
          • 29
            Used by Facebook
          • 23
            Because of Symfony
          • 21
            Dynamic Language
          • 17
            Easy to learn
          • 17
            Cheap hosting
          • 15
            Very powerful web language
          • 14
            Awesome Language and easy to implement
          • 14
            Fast development
          • 14
            Because of Laravel
          • 13
            Composer
          • 12
            Flexibility, syntax, extensibility
          • 9
            Easiest deployment
          • 8
            Readable Code
          • 8
            Fast
          • 7
            Short development lead times
          • 7
            Most of the web uses it
          • 7
            Worst popularity quality ratio
          • 7
            Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments
          • 6
            Simple, flexible yet Scalable
          • 6
            Faster then ever
          • 5
            Open source and large community
          • 4
            Cheap to own
          • 4
            Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)
          • 4
            Is like one zip of air
          • 4
            Open source and great framework
          • 4
            Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework
          • 4
            Easy to use and learn
          • 4
            Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks
          • 4
            Great developer experience
          • 4
            I have no choice :(
          • 2
            Hard not to use
          • 2
            Walk away
          • 2
            Interpreted at the run time
          • 2
            FFI
          • 2
            Safe the planet
          • 2
            Used by STOMT
          • 2
            Fault tolerance
          • 2
            Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps
          • 1
            Simplesaml
          • 1
            Bando
          • 1
            Secure
          • 1
            It can get you a lamborghini
          • 0
            Secure
          CONS OF PHP
          • 22
            So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find
          • 16
            Inconsistent API
          • 8
            Fragmented community
          • 6
            Not secure
          • 3
            No routing system
          • 3
            Hard to debug
          • 2
            Old

          related PHP posts

          Nick Rockwell
          SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.1M views

          When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

          So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

          React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

          Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more