Alternatives to LoopBack logo

Alternatives to LoopBack

DreamFactory, StrongLoop, Parse-Server, NestJS, and ExpressJS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to LoopBack.
285
556
+ 1
33

What is LoopBack and what are its top alternatives?

LoopBack is a highly extensible open-source Node.js framework that focuses on building APIs and connecting them to backend data sources. Key features include easy scaffolding, built-in support for major databases, and strong authentication and authorization capabilities. However, some limitations of LoopBack include a steep learning curve and less flexibility compared to other frameworks.

  1. Express.js: Express.js is a minimal and flexible Node.js web application framework that provides a robust set of features for web and mobile applications. It allows for building APIs and web applications quickly and efficiently. Pros include a large community and extensive middleware support, while cons may include lack of out-of-the-box support for certain features compared to LoopBack.
  2. NestJS: NestJS is a progressive Node.js framework inspired by Angular that enables building efficient and scalable server-side applications. It offers a rich feature set, solid typing with TypeScript, and focused on modularity and testability. Pros include extensive documentation and architectural patterns, while cons may involve a steeper learning curve compared to LoopBack.
  3. Koa: Koa is a lightweight Node.js web framework created by the team behind Express, designed for modern web applications and APIs. It features middleware support, generators for better error-handling, and a simpler implementation compared to Express. Pros include a more modular approach and cleaner codebase, while cons may include less community support compared to LoopBack.
  4. Fastify: Fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework for Node.js, highly focused on speed and efficiency. It offers a rapid development environment with a flexible plugin system and easy integration with various tools. Pros include unmatched performance and wide plugin ecosystem, while cons may involve less built-in features compared to LoopBack.
  5. AdonisJS: AdonisJS is a full-featured Node.js framework with a focus on developer ergonomics and speed. It provides a structured environment for building web applications, with features like ORM, authentication, and mail delivery out of the box. Pros include a full-featured stack and comprehensive documentation, while cons may include a smaller community compared to LoopBack.
  6. Strapi: Strapi is a headless CMS that offers a customizable API creation platform for Node.js applications. It provides a content management system with customizable REST and GraphQL endpoints, authentication, and role-based access control. Pros include a user-friendly interface and scalable architecture, while cons may involve a more specialized use case compared to LoopBack.
  7. Feathers: Feathers is a lightweight web framework for Node.js that simplifies real-time applications' development by offering plug-ins, services, and easily customizable REST and GraphQL APIs. It focuses on flexibility and scalability, making it suitable for various project sizes. Pros include modular architecture and the ability to choose database and frontend technologies, while cons may include a smaller community compared to LoopBack.
  8. Hapi: Hapi is a rich framework for building applications and services with Node.js, emphasizing configuration and reduced code duplication. It offers robust plugin support, validation, caching, and error handling features out of the box. Pros include configuration-centric design and advanced plugin system, while cons may include a potentially higher learning curve compared to LoopBack.
  9. Socket.io: Socket.io is a library for real-time web applications that enables bidirectional communication between clients and servers. It offers features like WebSocket support, multiplexing, and automatic reconnection. Pros include a simple and intuitive API for real-time applications, while cons may involve limited use cases compared to LoopBack.
  10. Meteor: Meteor is a full-stack JavaScript framework for building web and mobile applications, featuring seamless integration between backend and frontend. It includes features like real-time data synchronization, isomorphic JavaScript, and a strong ecosystem of packages. Pros include rapid development and straightforward deployment process, while cons may involve a more opinionated structure compared to LoopBack.

Top Alternatives to LoopBack

  • DreamFactory
    DreamFactory

    DreamFactory is an open source REST API backend for mobile, web, and IoT applications. It provides RESTful web services with pre-built connectors to SQL, NoSQL, file storage systems, and web services. It's secure, reusable, and offers live API documentation. ...

  • StrongLoop
    StrongLoop

    It is an American company working with Node.js to create and support StrongLoop Suite, a Mobile API Tier. StrongLoop employs two members of the Node.js Technical Steering Committee. IBM & StrongLoop contribute to and support Open-Source options for the API developer community, such as LoopBack, API Microgateway, and Open API Spec. ...

  • Parse-Server
    Parse-Server

    A Parse.com API compatible router package for Express. Read the announcement blog post here: http://blog.parse.com/announcements/introducing-parse-server-and-the-database-migration-tool/. Read the migration guide here: https://parse.com/docs/server/guide#migrating ...

  • NestJS
    NestJS

    Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming). Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available. ...

  • ExpressJS
    ExpressJS

    Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications. ...

  • Flask
    Flask

    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind. ...

  • Django REST framework
    Django REST framework

    It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

  • Sinatra
    Sinatra

    Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort. ...

LoopBack alternatives & related posts

DreamFactory logo

DreamFactory

40
83
21
Open source REST API backend for mobile, web, and IoT applications.
40
83
+ 1
21
PROS OF DREAMFACTORY
  • 6
    Restful
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 5
    SQL Rest APIS
  • 2
    Love this to easily build API's
  • 1
    Great customer support
  • 1
    Multi Platform
CONS OF DREAMFACTORY
    Be the first to leave a con

    related DreamFactory posts

    StrongLoop logo

    StrongLoop

    15
    33
    0
    Develop, manage and scale REST APIs with Node.js
    15
    33
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF STRONGLOOP
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF STRONGLOOP
        Be the first to leave a con

        related StrongLoop posts

        Parse-Server logo

        Parse-Server

        191
        238
        32
        Parse-compatible API server module for Node/Express
        191
        238
        + 1
        32
        PROS OF PARSE-SERVER
        • 13
          Open Source
        • 7
          Well documented
        • 4
          Easy setup, easy api, Fast,more platforms,realtime
        • 3
          No vendor lock-in
        • 2
          JSON
        • 2
          Backed by People
        • 1
          Friendly contributor community
        CONS OF PARSE-SERVER
        • 1
          No guarantee (comes as is)

        related Parse-Server posts

        NestJS logo

        NestJS

        2.3K
        2.9K
        326
        A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient and scalable server-side applications by @kammysliwiec.
        2.3K
        2.9K
        + 1
        326
        PROS OF NESTJS
        • 54
          Powerful but super friendly to work with
        • 42
          Fast development
        • 40
          Easy to understand documentation
        • 36
          Angular style syntax for the backend
        • 32
          NodeJS ecosystem
        • 31
          Typescript
        • 27
          Its easy to understand since it follows angular syntax
        • 18
          Good architecture
        • 13
          Integrates with Narwhal Extensions
        • 12
          Typescript makes it well integrated in vscode
        • 8
          Graphql support easy
        • 7
          Agnosticism
        • 5
          Easily integrate with others external extensions
        • 1
          Official courses
        CONS OF NESTJS
        • 10
          Difficult to debug
        • 10
          User base is small. Less help on Stackoverflow
        • 5
          Angular-like architecture
        • 3
          Updates with breaking changes
        • 3
          Javascript
        • 1
          Frontend in backend
        • 1
          Unstable

        related NestJS posts

        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 4.7M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more
        Jan Vlnas
        Developer Advocate at Superface · | 12 upvotes · 322.3K views

        Our framework of choice for backend at Superface is NestJS. We also use AppSignal for APM and error tracking. While AppSignal provides some basic integration for Node.js, getting the monitoring to work with Nest was a bit tricky. Check out our blog post on Integrating AppSignal APM with NestJS how we made it work.

        See more
        ExpressJS logo

        ExpressJS

        31.2K
        23.2K
        1.6K
        Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple
        31.2K
        23.2K
        + 1
        1.6K
        PROS OF EXPRESSJS
        • 380
          Simple
        • 336
          Node.js
        • 244
          Javascript
        • 193
          High performance
        • 152
          Robust routing
        • 73
          Middlewares
        • 71
          Open source
        • 59
          Great community
        • 37
          Hybrid web applications
        • 16
          Well documented
        • 9
          Rapid development
        • 9
          Sinatra inspired
        • 7
          Socket connection
        • 7
          Isomorphic js.. superfast and easy
        • 5
          Light weight
        • 4
          Resource available for learning
        • 4
          Npm
        • 3
          Event loop
        • 3
          Callbacks
        • 2
          Data stream
        CONS OF EXPRESSJS
        • 27
          Not python
        • 17
          Overrated
        • 14
          No multithreading
        • 9
          Javascript
        • 5
          Not fast
        • 2
          Easily Insecure for Novices

        related ExpressJS posts

        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 4.7M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more

        Repost

        Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

        Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

        Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

        Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

        See more
        Flask logo

        Flask

        18.7K
        15.8K
        82
        A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
        18.7K
        15.8K
        + 1
        82
        PROS OF FLASK
        • 14
          Flexibilty
        • 10
          For it flexibility
        • 9
          Flexibilty and easy to use
        • 8
          Flask
        • 7
          User friendly
        • 6
          Secured
        • 5
          Unopinionated
        • 3
          Orm
        • 2
          Secure
        • 1
          Beautiful code
        • 1
          Easy to get started
        • 1
          Easy to develop and maintain applications
        • 1
          Not JS
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Documentation
        • 1
          Python
        • 1
          Minimal
        • 1
          Lightweight
        • 1
          Easy to setup and get it going
        • 1
          Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
        • 1
          Easy to integrate
        • 1
          Speed
        • 1
          Get started quickly
        • 1
          Customizable
        • 1
          Simple to use
        • 1
          Powerful
        • 1
          Rapid development
        • 0
          Open source
        • 0
          Well designed
        • 0
          Productive
        • 0
          Awesome
        • 0
          Expressive
        • 0
          Love it
        CONS OF FLASK
        • 10
          Not JS
        • 7
          Context
        • 5
          Not fast
        • 1
          Don't has many module as in spring

        related Flask posts

        James Man
        Software Engineer at Pinterest · | 45 upvotes · 2.8M views
        Shared insights
        on
        FlaskFlaskReactReact
        at

        One of our top priorities at Pinterest is fostering a safe and trustworthy experience for all Pinners. As Pinterest’s user base and ads business grow, the review volume has been increasing exponentially, and more content types require moderation support. To solve greater engineering and operational challenges at scale, we needed a highly-reliable and performant system to detect, report, evaluate, and act on abusive content and users and so we created Pinqueue.

        Pinqueue-3.0 serves as a generic platform for content moderation and human labeling. Under the hood, Pinqueue3.0 is a Flask + React app powered by Pinterest’s very own Gestalt UI framework. On the backend, Pinqueue3.0 heavily relies on PinLater, a Pinterest-built reliable asynchronous job execution system, to handle the requests for enqueueing and action-taking. Using PinLater has significantly strengthened Pinqueue3.0’s overall infra with its capability of processing a massive load of events with configurable retry policies.

        Hundreds of millions of people around the world use Pinterest to discover and do what they love, and our job is to protect them from abusive and harmful content. We’re committed to providing an inspirational yet safe experience to all Pinners. Solving trust & safety problems is a joint effort requiring expertise across multiple domains. Pinqueue3.0 not only plays a critical role in responsively taking down unsafe content, it also has become an enabler for future ML/automation initiatives by providing high-quality human labels. Going forward, we will continue to improve the review experience, measure review quality and collaborate with our machine learning teams to solve content moderation beyond manual reviews at an even larger scale.

        See more

        Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

        See more
        Django REST framework logo

        Django REST framework

        1.9K
        2K
        310
        Web APIs for Django
        1.9K
        2K
        + 1
        310
        PROS OF DJANGO REST FRAMEWORK
        • 66
          Easy to use
        • 65
          Browsable api
        • 53
          Great documentation
        • 50
          Customizable
        • 42
          Fast development
        • 9
          Easy to use, customizable, pluggable, serializer
        • 8
          Python
        • 7
          Django ORM
        • 5
          FastSerialize
        • 3
          Less code
        • 2
          Easy implementation
        CONS OF DJANGO REST FRAMEWORK
        • 2
          Bad documentation
        • 2
          Reimplements Django functionality
        • 1
          No support for URL Namespaces
        • 0
          Bad CSRF handling

        related Django REST framework posts

        Arjiv Jivithkumar
        Junior Product Manager at Vozz · | 13 upvotes · 72.7K views

        Hey everyone! I'm planning on building a personal project - this will be my first full-stack project and will be a web app.

        The way it will work is that users will be able to post groups. This can be, groups for studying or groups for work, etc. They can also set the desired group size (e.g. limit the group to 3 members). Other users can then join said group - once the group is full, it will automatically close.

        What tech stack would you all recommend for this? I have a lot of experience with Django so maybe that will be good for the backend but I'm not sure where to go from there. I've heard using the Django REST framework with a React frontend might be good. Always open to learning new technologies and thanks in advance!

        See more

        I am planning on creating an application using the following tech-stack. Vue.js (TypeScript) for the front-end, Django (specifically Django REST framework) for the server-side work, and using PostgreSQL as the database. Is there any reason NOT to use this tech stack mentioned or are there better options? Without giving away too much info, my app will be logging information from the user, displaying this information, setting goals, displaying visual graphs, a friend system where you can add other people etc...

        See more
        Sinatra logo

        Sinatra

        1K
        498
        212
        Classy web-development dressed in a DSL
        1K
        498
        + 1
        212
        PROS OF SINATRA
        • 65
          Lightweight
        • 50
          Simple
        • 35
          Open source
        • 20
          Ruby
        • 13
          Great ecosystem of tools
        • 10
          Ease of use
        • 8
          If you know http you know sinatra
        • 5
          Large Community
        • 5
          Fast
        • 1
          Flexibilty and easy to use
        CONS OF SINATRA
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Sinatra posts