Alternatives to Mockito logo

Alternatives to Mockito

JUnit, Appium, Robolectric, mockk, and Cucumber are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Mockito.
198
110
+ 1
0

What is Mockito and what are its top alternatives?

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn鈥檛 give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.
Mockito is a tool in the Testing Frameworks category of a tech stack.
Mockito is an open source tool with 11.9K GitHub stars and 2.1K GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to Mockito's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Mockito

  • JUnit

    JUnit

    JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...

  • Appium

    Appium

    Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers. ...

  • Robolectric

    Robolectric

    It is a framework that brings fast and reliable unit tests to Android. Tests run inside the JVM on your workstation in seconds. Test drive your Android application with robolectric ...

  • mockk

    mockk

    It is an open-source library focused on making mocking in Kotlin great. It is a library with the possibility of mocking default arguments, final classes, varargs, coroutines and extension methods. ...

  • Cucumber

    Cucumber

    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs. ...

  • PHPUnit

    PHPUnit

    PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...

  • RSpec

    RSpec

    Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.

  • pytest

    pytest

    A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool. ...

Mockito alternatives & related posts

JUnit logo

JUnit

748
430
0
A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java
748
430
+ 1
0
PROS OF JUNIT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JUNIT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JUnit posts

      We are looking for a Testing Tool that can integrate with Java/ React/ Go/ Python/ Node.js. Which amongst the three tools JUnit, NUnit & Selenium would be the best for this use case?

      See more
      Joshua Dean K眉pper
      CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschr盲nkt) | 1 upvote 路 120.5K views

      We use JUnit for our Java Unit and Integration tests in Version 5. Combined with @JMockit2 and @truth (from Google) we perform all kinds of tests on our minecraft, standalone and microservice architecture.

      We prefer JUnit over TestNG because of the bigger community, better support and the generally more agile development. JUnit integrates nicely with most software, while TestNG support is a little more limited.

      See more
      Appium logo

      Appium

      364
      379
      14
      Automation for iOS and Android Apps
      364
      379
      + 1
      14
      PROS OF APPIUM
      • 9
        Webdriverio support
      • 3
        Java, C#, Python support
      • 1
        Support iOS test automation
      • 1
        Support android test automation
      CONS OF APPIUM
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Appium posts

        Kevin Roulleau
        QA Engineer Freelance at happn | 5 upvotes 路 151.1K views

        I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

        See more
        Robolectric logo

        Robolectric

        18
        23
        0
        An open-source testing framework for Android
        18
        23
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF ROBOLECTRIC
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF ROBOLECTRIC
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Robolectric posts

            mockk logo

            mockk

            13
            8
            0
            Mocking library for Kotlin
            13
            8
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF MOCKK
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF MOCKK
                Be the first to leave a con

                related mockk posts

                Cucumber logo

                Cucumber

                655
                631
                22
                Simple, human collaboration.
                655
                631
                + 1
                22
                PROS OF CUCUMBER
                • 16
                  Simple Syntax
                • 2
                  Nice report
                • 2
                  Simple usage
                • 2
                  Huge community
                CONS OF CUCUMBER
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Cucumber posts

                  Benjamin Poon
                  QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital | 8 upvotes 路 672.8K views

                  For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

                  With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

                  See more
                  Sarah Elson
                  Product Growth at LambdaTest | 4 upvotes 路 283.5K views

                  @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

                  See more
                  PHPUnit logo

                  PHPUnit

                  348
                  187
                  5
                  Testing framework for PHP
                  348
                  187
                  + 1
                  5
                  PROS OF PHPUNIT
                  • 2
                    TDD Acceptance Testing
                  • 1
                    TDD Integration Testing
                  • 1
                    TDD Unit Testing
                  • 1
                    The de facto standard for xUnit testing in PHP
                  CONS OF PHPUNIT
                  • 1
                    Mocked services require more effort and understanding

                  related PHPUnit posts

                  RSpec logo

                  RSpec

                  327
                  149
                  0
                  Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby
                  327
                  149
                  + 1
                  0
                  PROS OF RSPEC
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF RSPEC
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related RSpec posts

                      I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

                      We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

                      Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis 聽for cache and other time sensitive operations.

                      We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

                      Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

                      See more
                      Simon Bettison
                      Managing Director at Bettison.org Limited | 7 upvotes 路 284.1K views

                      In 2010 we made the very difficult decision to entirely re-engineer our existing monolithic LAMP application from the ground up in order to address some growing concerns about it's long term viability as a platform.

                      Full application re-write is almost always never the answer, because of the risks involved. However the situation warranted drastic action as it was clear that the existing product was going to face severe scaling issues. We felt it better address these sooner rather than later and also take the opportunity to improve the international architecture and also to refactor the database in. order that it better matched the changes in core functionality.

                      PostgreSQL was chosen for its reputation as being solid ACID compliant database backend, it was available as an offering AWS RDS service which reduced the management overhead of us having to configure it ourselves. In order to reduce read load on the primary database we implemented an Elasticsearch layer for fast and scalable search operations. Synchronisation of these indexes was to be achieved through the use of Sidekiq's Redis based background workers on Amazon ElastiCache. Again the AWS solution here looked to be an easy way to keep our involvement in managing this part of the platform at a minimum. Allowing us to focus on our core business.

                      Rails ls was chosen for its ability to quickly get core functionality up and running, its MVC architecture and also its focus on Test Driven Development using RSpec and Selenium with Travis CI providing continual integration. We also liked Ruby for its terse, clean and elegant syntax. Though YMMV on that one!

                      Unicorn was chosen for its continual deployment and reputation as a reliable application server, nginx for its reputation as a fast and stable reverse-proxy. We also took advantage of the Amazon CloudFront CDN here to further improve performance by caching static assets globally.

                      We tried to strike a balance between having control over management and configuration of our core application with the convenience of being able to leverage AWS hosted services for ancillary functions (Amazon SES , Amazon SQS Amazon Route 53 all hosted securely inside Amazon VPC of course!).

                      Whilst there is some compromise here with potential vendor lock in, the tasks being performed by these ancillary services are no particularly specialised which should mitigate this risk. Furthermore we have already containerised the stack in our development using Docker environment, and looking to how best to bring this into production - potentially using Amazon EC2 Container Service

                      See more
                      pytest logo

                      pytest

                      245
                      173
                      0
                      A full-featured Python testing tool to help you write better programs
                      245
                      173
                      + 1
                      0
                      PROS OF PYTEST
                        Be the first to leave a pro
                        CONS OF PYTEST
                          Be the first to leave a con

                          related pytest posts