Alternatives to Mockito logo

Alternatives to Mockito

JUnit, Appium, Robolectric, mockk, and Cucumber are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Mockito.
174
79
+ 1
0

What is Mockito and what are its top alternatives?

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn鈥檛 give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.
Mockito is a tool in the Testing Frameworks category of a tech stack.
Mockito is an open source tool with 10.7K GitHub stars and 1.9K GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to Mockito's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Mockito

Mockito alternatives & related posts

JUnit logo

JUnit

669
324
0
A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java
669
324
+ 1
0
PROS OF JUNIT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JUNIT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JUnit posts

      Joshua Dean K眉pper
      Joshua Dean K眉pper
      CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschr盲nkt) | 1 upvotes 75.2K views

      We use JUnit for our Java Unit and Integration tests in Version 5. Combined with @JMockit2 and @truth (from Google) we perform all kinds of tests on our minecraft, standalone and microservice architecture.

      We prefer JUnit over TestNG because of the bigger community, better support and the generally more agile development. JUnit integrates nicely with most software, while TestNG support is a little more limited.

      See more
      Whitney Carmichael
      Whitney Carmichael
      Head of Marketing and Sales at ReTest | 1 upvotes 51.1K views

      Automated tests are hard to create, often fragile and incomplete, we at retest decided to support a different testing paradigm.

      Therefore, we created recheck - an open source API / CLI. The testing module recheck uses Golden Master, where each webpage can be checked thus defining individual specifications is unnecessary. Test automation is made more robust and the number of false positives are reduced. This means if a test fails with recheck, it was meant to fail.

      Review - our efficient and intuitive GUI application accepts or ignores changes easily and seamlessly. It also allows users to reduce their workload and learning curve with a patented 1-click mechanism. And since review is not a SaaS tool this removes the detested test maintenance.

      Our API/CLI will be an open source software testing tool. While our GUI is a paid fully functioning offline license.

      JUnit Selenium Java GitHub JIRA

      See more
      Appium logo

      Appium

      257
      255
      8
      Automation for iOS and Android Apps
      257
      255
      + 1
      8
      CONS OF APPIUM
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Appium posts

        Kevin Roulleau
        Kevin Roulleau
        QA Engineer Freelance at happn | 5 upvotes 94.1K views

        I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

        See more
        Robolectric logo

        Robolectric

        15
        12
        0
        An open-source testing framework for Android
        15
        12
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF ROBOLECTRIC
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF ROBOLECTRIC
            Be the first to leave a con
            mockk logo

            mockk

            2
            1
            0
            Mocking library for Kotlin
            2
            1
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF MOCKK
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF MOCKK
                Be the first to leave a con
                Cucumber logo

                Cucumber

                530
                423
                10
                Simple, human collaboration.
                530
                423
                + 1
                10
                PROS OF CUCUMBER
                CONS OF CUCUMBER
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Cucumber posts

                  Benjamin Poon
                  Benjamin Poon
                  QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital | 8 upvotes 505.8K views

                  For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

                  With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

                  See more
                  Sarah Elson
                  Sarah Elson
                  Product Growth at LambdaTest | 4 upvotes 202.8K views

                  @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

                  See more
                  RSpec logo

                  RSpec

                  407
                  116
                  0
                  Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby
                  407
                  116
                  + 1
                  0
                  PROS OF RSPEC
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF RSPEC
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related RSpec posts

                      I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

                      We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

                      Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis 聽for cache and other time sensitive operations.

                      We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

                      Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

                      See more
                      Simon Bettison
                      Simon Bettison
                      Managing Director at Bettison.org Limited | 7 upvotes 249.5K views

                      In 2010 we made the very difficult decision to entirely re-engineer our existing monolithic LAMP application from the ground up in order to address some growing concerns about it's long term viability as a platform.

                      Full application re-write is almost always never the answer, because of the risks involved. However the situation warranted drastic action as it was clear that the existing product was going to face severe scaling issues. We felt it better address these sooner rather than later and also take the opportunity to improve the international architecture and also to refactor the database in. order that it better matched the changes in core functionality.

                      PostgreSQL was chosen for its reputation as being solid ACID compliant database backend, it was available as an offering AWS RDS service which reduced the management overhead of us having to configure it ourselves. In order to reduce read load on the primary database we implemented an Elasticsearch layer for fast and scalable search operations. Synchronisation of these indexes was to be achieved through the use of Sidekiq's Redis based background workers on Amazon ElastiCache. Again the AWS solution here looked to be an easy way to keep our involvement in managing this part of the platform at a minimum. Allowing us to focus on our core business.

                      Rails ls was chosen for its ability to quickly get core functionality up and running, its MVC architecture and also its focus on Test Driven Development using RSpec and Selenium with Travis CI providing continual integration. We also liked Ruby for its terse, clean and elegant syntax. Though YMMV on that one!

                      Unicorn was chosen for its continual deployment and reputation as a reliable application server, nginx for its reputation as a fast and stable reverse-proxy. We also took advantage of the Amazon CloudFront CDN here to further improve performance by caching static assets globally.

                      We tried to strike a balance between having control over management and configuration of our core application with the convenience of being able to leverage AWS hosted services for ancillary functions (Amazon SES , Amazon SQS Amazon Route 53 all hosted securely inside Amazon VPC of course!).

                      Whilst there is some compromise here with potential vendor lock in, the tasks being performed by these ancillary services are no particularly specialised which should mitigate this risk. Furthermore we have already containerised the stack in our development using Docker environment, and looking to how best to bring this into production - potentially using Amazon EC2 Container Service

                      See more
                      Capybara logo

                      Capybara

                      313
                      137
                      11
                      Acceptance test framework for web applications
                      313
                      137
                      + 1
                      11