What is Poltergeist and what are its top alternatives?
Poltergeist is a headless testing driver for Capybara that allows developers to simulate interactions with a web page without requiring a browser. It provides a high level API for interacting with JavaScript frontend applications and is commonly used for testing in Ruby on Rails projects. However, one limitation of Poltergeist is that it relies on PhantomJS, which is no longer actively maintained.
- Selenium WebDriver: Selenium WebDriver is a popular tool for browser automation that supports multiple programming languages. It provides a wide range of browser support, making it versatile for testing various web applications. One downside compared to Poltergeist is the overhead of setting up and maintaining various web drivers.
- Cypress: Cypress is a front-end testing tool built for modern web applications. It provides a clear and intuitive interface for testing, along with built-in features for debugging. Compared to Poltergeist, Cypress offers faster test execution times and better reliability.
- Puppeteer: Puppeteer is a Node.js library developed by Google for controlling the Chrome browser. It offers a high level API for interacting with web pages and has excellent support for testing modern web technologies like PWAs. One advantage over Poltergeist is its active development and support from Google.
- Playwright: Playwright is a testing tool developed by Microsoft that provides automation for web applications across multiple browsers. It supports various programming languages and offers robust features for testing complex scenarios. Compared to Poltergeist, Playwright benefits from continuous updates and improvements.
- TestCafe: TestCafe is a Node.js testing tool that automates web testing across different browsers. It simplifies the testing process by handling the browser driver setup and parallel test execution. Compared to Poltergeist, TestCafe offers better cross-browser compatibility and performance.
- Nightwatch.js: Nightwatch.js is an automated testing framework for web applications that uses Selenium WebDriver internally. It provides a simple yet powerful API for writing end-to-end tests and supports various test runner plugins. Compared to Poltergeist, Nightwatch.js offers better browser compatibility and community support.
- Webdriver.io: Webdriver.io is a testing framework that offers a simple and concise syntax for writing tests using Selenium WebDriver. It provides detailed documentation and integrations with popular testing tools like Mocha and Jasmine. Compared to Poltergeist, Webdriver.io has better JavaScript support and scalability for large test suites.
- Katalon Studio: Katalon Studio is a comprehensive testing solution for web and mobile applications that includes support for multiple testing frameworks like Selenium and Appium. It offers a user-friendly interface for creating test cases and supports seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines. Compared to Poltergeist, Katalon Studio provides a unified testing platform with broader application support.
- Robot Framework: Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework that can be used for testing web applications among other types of systems. It offers a keyword-driven approach for writing tests and supports various libraries for extending its functionality. Compared to Poltergeist, Robot Framework provides flexibility and extensibility for diverse testing requirements.
- Karma: Karma is a test runner developed by the AngularJS team for running JavaScript unit tests in real browsers. It provides a consistent testing environment across different browsers and devices, making it ideal for testing compatibility. Compared to Poltergeist, Karma focuses on unit testing rather than end-to-end testing but offers better browser coverage.
Top Alternatives to Poltergeist
- Ghost
Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do. ...
- Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...
- Remake
It is a new way to build web apps. It lets startups launch products quicker and start talking to customers sooner. ...
- JUnit
JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...
- RSpec
Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.
- PHPUnit
PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...
- pytest
A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool. ...
- Mockito
It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors. ...
Poltergeist alternatives & related posts
- Beautiful45
- Fast35
- Quick/simple post styling29
- Live Post Preview20
- Open source20
- Non-profit19
- Seamless writing16
- Node.js6
- Fast and Performatic5
- Javascript5
- Simplest4
- Wonderful UI3
- Handlebars3
- Full Control3
- Magic2
- Clean2
- Headless CMS1
- Self-hostable1
related Ghost posts
- Automates browsers175
- Testing154
- Essential tool for running test automation101
- Record-Playback24
- Remote Control24
- Data crawling8
- Supports end to end testing7
- Easy set up6
- Functional testing6
- The Most flexible monitoring system4
- End to End Testing3
- Easy to integrate with build tools3
- Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm2
- Record and playback2
- Compatible with Python2
- Easy to scale2
- Integration Tests2
- Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework0
- Flaky tests8
- Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)4
- Update browser drivers2
related Selenium posts
When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.
For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL
With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.
related Remake posts
related JUnit posts
We are looking for a Testing Tool that can integrate with Java/ React/ Go/ Python/ Node.js. Which amongst the three tools JUnit, NUnit & Selenium would be the best for this use case?
We use JUnit for our Java Unit and Integration tests in Version 5. Combined with @JMockit2 and @truth (from Google) we perform all kinds of tests on our minecraft, standalone and microservice architecture.
We prefer JUnit over TestNG because of the bigger community, better support and the generally more agile development. JUnit integrates nicely with most software, while TestNG support is a little more limited.
related RSpec posts
I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.
We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.
Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis for cache and other time sensitive operations.
We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.
Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.
In 2012 we made the very difficult decision to entirely re-engineer our existing monolithic LAMP application from the ground up in order to address some growing concerns about it's long term viability as a platform.
Full application re-write is almost always never the answer, because of the risks involved. However the situation warranted drastic action as it was clear that the existing product was going to face severe scaling issues. We felt it better address these sooner rather than later and also take the opportunity to improve the international architecture and also to refactor the database in. order that it better matched the changes in core functionality.
PostgreSQL was chosen for its reputation as being solid ACID compliant database backend, it was available as an offering AWS RDS service which reduced the management overhead of us having to configure it ourselves. In order to reduce read load on the primary database we implemented an Elasticsearch layer for fast and scalable search operations. Synchronisation of these indexes was to be achieved through the use of Sidekiq's Redis based background workers on Amazon ElastiCache. Again the AWS solution here looked to be an easy way to keep our involvement in managing this part of the platform at a minimum. Allowing us to focus on our core business.
Rails ls was chosen for its ability to quickly get core functionality up and running, its MVC architecture and also its focus on Test Driven Development using RSpec and Selenium with Travis CI providing continual integration. We also liked Ruby for its terse, clean and elegant syntax. Though YMMV on that one!
Unicorn was chosen for its continual deployment and reputation as a reliable application server, nginx for its reputation as a fast and stable reverse-proxy. We also took advantage of the Amazon CloudFront CDN here to further improve performance by caching static assets globally.
We tried to strike a balance between having control over management and configuration of our core application with the convenience of being able to leverage AWS hosted services for ancillary functions (Amazon SES , Amazon SQS Amazon Route 53 all hosted securely inside Amazon VPC of course!).
Whilst there is some compromise here with potential vendor lock in, the tasks being performed by these ancillary services are no particularly specialised which should mitigate this risk. Furthermore we have already containerised the stack in our development using Docker environment, and looking to how best to bring this into production - potentially using Amazon EC2 Container Service
- TDD Unit Testing5
- TDD Integration Testing2
- Software Quality2
- TDD Acceptance Testing2
- TDD Unit Testing1
- Unit Testing1
- The de facto standard for xUnit testing in PHP1
- Mocked services require more effort and understanding1
related PHPUnit posts
What is the best solution (PHPUnit or Behat) for test automation (unit and functional tests)?