Alternatives to Runscope logo

Alternatives to Runscope

Postman, BlazeMeter, New Relic, Pingdom, and Apigee are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Runscope.
132
60

What is Runscope and what are its top alternatives?

Runscope is a powerful API monitoring and testing tool that allows developers to automate API tests, monitor API performance, and debug issues in real-time. It offers features such as API test automation, traffic logging, real-time alerts, and integration with popular tools like Slack and PagerDuty. However, Runscope can be expensive for small teams and lacks some advanced features compared to other tools in the market.

  1. Postman: Postman is a widely-used API testing tool that offers a user-friendly interface, collaboration features, and extensive automation capabilities. Pros: easy to use, robust testing features. Cons: limited monitoring capabilities compared to Runscope.
  2. Swagger Inspector: Swagger Inspector is a free API testing tool that allows users to quickly test APIs without writing any code. Pros: free to use, simple interface. Cons: lacks advanced testing features.
  3. Assertible: Assertible is an API testing and monitoring tool that focuses on automating API tests and providing detailed reports for debugging. Pros: comprehensive testing features, detailed reports. Cons: can be complex for beginners.
  4. Paw: Paw is a Mac-based API testing tool that offers a visual interface for creating and testing APIs. Pros: intuitive interface, advanced testing features. Cons: limited to Mac users only.
  5. LoadImpact: LoadImpact is a performance testing tool that can be used to test API performance under heavy loads. Pros: great for load testing, detailed performance insights. Cons: focused on performance testing only.
  6. SoapUI: SoapUI is an open-source API testing tool that supports REST and SOAP APIs, and offers features like assertion testing and data-driven testing. Pros: open-source, supports multiple API types. Cons: can be complex for beginners.
  7. Katalon Studio: Katalon Studio is a comprehensive test automation tool that supports API testing in addition to web and mobile testing. Pros: all-in-one automation tool, supports multiple testing types. Cons: can be overwhelming for beginners.
  8. Apigee: Apigee is a full API management platform that includes API testing and monitoring capabilities. Pros: robust API management features, scalable. Cons: may be too complex for small teams.
  9. Runscope: Despite its limitations, Runscope remains a viable option for teams looking for a reliable API testing and monitoring solution with real-time alerts and integrations.
  10. Tricentis Tosca: Tricentis Tosca is an enterprise-level test automation tool that supports API testing along with other types of testing. Pros: enterprise-grade features, comprehensive testing capabilities. Cons: may be too expensive for small teams.

Top Alternatives to Runscope

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • BlazeMeter
    BlazeMeter

    Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br> ...

  • New Relic
    New Relic

    The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too. ...

  • Pingdom
    Pingdom

    Pingdom is an uptime monitoring service. When problems happen with a site that Pingdom monitors, it immediately alerts the owner so the problem can be taken care of. ...

  • Apigee
    Apigee

    API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world. ...

  • Assertible
    Assertible

    Reduce bugs in web applications by using Assertible to create an automated QA pipeline that helps you catch failures & ship code faster. ...

  • Kong
    Kong

    Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

Runscope alternatives & related posts

Postman logo

Postman

94.5K
81K
1.8K
Only complete API development environment
94.5K
81K
+ 1
1.8K
PROS OF POSTMAN
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 53
    History feature
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 43
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 35
    The best in class app
  • 12
    Can save and share script
  • 10
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 8
    Collections
  • 8
    Option to run scrips
  • 8
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 7
    Shareable Collections
  • 7
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 7
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 6
    Great integration with newman
  • 5
    Documentation
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Saves responses
  • 4
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 4
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 4
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    API-network
  • 3
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 3
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 2
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 2
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 2
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 2
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 2
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 2
    Runner
  • 2
    Graph
  • 1
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
CONS OF POSTMAN
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 3
    Not free after 5 users
  • 3
    Can't prompt for per-request variables
  • 1
    Import swagger
  • 1
    Support websocket
  • 1
    Import curl

related Postman posts

Noah Zoschke
Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
BlazeMeter logo

BlazeMeter

69
158
13
The Load Testing Platform for Developers
69
158
+ 1
13
PROS OF BLAZEMETER
  • 10
    I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
  • 3
    Easy to prepare JMeter workers
CONS OF BLAZEMETER
  • 1
    Costly
  • 1
    UI centric

related BlazeMeter posts

Shared insights
on
BlazeMeterBlazeMeterApache JMeterApache JMeter

How to optimize performance testing for services on AWS Cloud? Recently our organization application has been migrated to the cloud. And I'm wondering how to commence the performance testing. Currently, our team using Apache JMeter with BlazeMeter. However, they are facing some challenges while using them. So we are looking for new tools to overcome those challenges.

See more
New Relic logo

New Relic

20.8K
8.6K
1.9K
New Relic is the industry’s largest and most comprehensive cloud-based observability platform.
20.8K
8.6K
+ 1
1.9K
PROS OF NEW RELIC
  • 415
    Easy setup
  • 344
    Really powerful
  • 245
    Awesome visualization
  • 194
    Ease of use
  • 151
    Great ui
  • 106
    Free tier
  • 80
    Great tool for insights
  • 66
    Heroku Integration
  • 55
    Market leader
  • 49
    Peace of mind
  • 21
    Push notifications
  • 20
    Email notifications
  • 17
    Heroku Add-on
  • 16
    Error Detection and Alerting
  • 13
    Multiple language support
  • 11
    SQL Analysis
  • 11
    Server Resources Monitoring
  • 9
    Transaction Tracing
  • 8
    Apdex Scores
  • 8
    Azure Add-on
  • 7
    Analysis of CPU, Disk, Memory, and Network
  • 7
    Detailed reports
  • 6
    Performance of External Services
  • 6
    Error Analysis
  • 6
    Application Availability Monitoring and Alerting
  • 6
    Application Response Times
  • 5
    Most Time Consuming Transactions
  • 5
    JVM Performance Analyzer (Java)
  • 4
    Browser Transaction Tracing
  • 4
    Top Database Operations
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Application Map
  • 3
    Weekly Performance Email
  • 3
    Pagoda Box integration
  • 3
    Custom Dashboards
  • 2
    Easy to setup
  • 2
    Background Jobs Transaction Analysis
  • 2
    App Speed Index
  • 1
    Super Expensive
  • 1
    Team Collaboration Tools
  • 1
    Metric Data Retention
  • 1
    Metric Data Resolution
  • 1
    Worst Transactions by User Dissatisfaction
  • 1
    Real User Monitoring Overview
  • 1
    Real User Monitoring Analysis and Breakdown
  • 1
    Time Comparisons
  • 1
    Access to Performance Data API
  • 1
    Incident Detection and Alerting
  • 1
    Best of the best, what more can you ask for
  • 1
    Best monitoring on the market
  • 1
    Rails integration
  • 1
    Free
  • 0
    Proce
  • 0
    Price
  • 0
    Exceptions
  • 0
    Cost
CONS OF NEW RELIC
  • 20
    Pricing model doesn't suit microservices
  • 10
    UI isn't great
  • 7
    Expensive
  • 7
    Visualizations aren't very helpful
  • 5
    Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking

related New Relic posts

Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
Software Engineer at IVP · | 8 upvotes · 1.5M views

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

See more
Shared insights
on
New RelicNew RelicKibanaKibana

I need to choose a monitoring tool for my project, but currently, my application doesn't have much load or many users. My application is not generating GBs of data. We don't want to send the user information to New Relic because it's a 3rd party tool. And we can deploy Kibana locally on our server. What should I use, Kibana or New Relic?

See more
Pingdom logo

Pingdom

2.4K
1.4K
579
Uptime and performance monitoring made easy
2.4K
1.4K
+ 1
579
PROS OF PINGDOM
  • 224
    Simple and reliable
  • 103
    Monitoring your websites
  • 75
    Easy to use dashboard
  • 65
    Email, text & twitter alerts
  • 43
    Free tier
  • 23
    Performance data
  • 14
    Detailed Reports
  • 11
    Email Reports
  • 9
    Mobile App
  • 9
    Root Cause Analysis
  • 1
    30-day risk free trial
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    IOS app
CONS OF PINGDOM
  • 4
    Expensive
  • 3
    UI is incredibly complicated
  • 2
    Hard to set up alerts properly

related Pingdom posts

Jerome Dalbert
Principal Backend Software Engineer at StackShare · | 5 upvotes · 290.5K views

We currently monitor performance with the following tools:

  1. Heroku Metrics: our main app is Hosted on Heroku, so it is the best place to get quick server metrics like memory usage, load averages, or response times.
  2. Good old New Relic for detailed general metrics, including transaction times.
  3. Skylight for more specific Rails Controller#action transaction times. Navigating those timings is much better than with New Relic, as you get a clear full breakdown of everything that happens for a given request.

Skylight offers better Rails performance insights, so why use New Relic? Because it does frontend monitoring, while Skylight doesn't. Now that we have a separate frontend app though, our frontend engineers are looking into more specialized frontend monitoring solutions.

Finally, if one of our apps go down, Pingdom alerts us on Slack and texts some of us.

See more
Nikola Yovchev
Head of Engineering at Relay42 · | 2 upvotes · 130.9K views

#Datadog #Relay42 #Monitoring

With Datadog unveiling their Synthetics product (https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/introducing-synthetic-monitoring/), we at Relay42 are considering moving out of Pingdom.

The rationale is simple:

  • 90% of our monitoring is on Datadog, apart from the external requests. It'd be nice to identify regional issues in one place, so this is great in our monitoring consolidation efforts.

  • The lack of a non-community Terraform provider for Pingdom

We have yet to get in the beta and test it out but we feel very excited about this announcement.

See more
Apigee logo

Apigee

238
688
30
Intelligent and complete API platform
238
688
+ 1
30
PROS OF APIGEE
  • 12
    Highly scalable and secure API Management Platform
  • 6
    Good documentation
  • 6
    Quick jumpstart
  • 3
    Fast and adjustable caching
  • 3
    Easy to use
CONS OF APIGEE
  • 11
    Expensive
  • 1
    Doesn't support hybrid natively

related Apigee posts

A Luthra
VP Software Engrg at Reliant · | 3 upvotes · 1M views
Shared insights
on
ApigeeApigeeAmazon API GatewayAmazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigee. How do they compare as an API Gateway? What is the equivalent functionality, similarities, and differences moving from Apigee API GW to AWS API GW?

See more
Assertible logo

Assertible

10
21
0
Automated QA tools to test and monitor your web services across deployments and environments
10
21
+ 1
0
PROS OF ASSERTIBLE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF ASSERTIBLE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Assertible posts

      Kong logo

      Kong

      641
      1.5K
      139
      Open Source Microservice & API Management Layer
      641
      1.5K
      + 1
      139
      PROS OF KONG
      • 37
        Easy to maintain
      • 32
        Easy to install
      • 26
        Flexible
      • 21
        Great performance
      • 7
        Api blueprint
      • 4
        Custom Plugins
      • 3
        Kubernetes-native
      • 2
        Security
      • 2
        Has a good plugin infrastructure
      • 2
        Agnostic
      • 1
        Load balancing
      • 1
        Documentation is clear
      • 1
        Very customizable
      CONS OF KONG
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Kong posts

        Al Tsang
        Problem/Challenge

        We needed a lightweight and completely customizable #microservices #gateway to be able to generate #JWT and introspect #OAuth2 tokens as well. The #gateway was going to front all #APIs for our single page web app as well as externalized #APIs for our partners.

        Contenders

        We looked at Tyk Cloud and Kong. Kong's plugins are all Lua based and its core is NGINX and OpenResty. Although it's open source, it's not the greatest platform to be able to customize. On top of that enterprise features are paid and expensive. Tyk is Go and the nomenclature used within Tyk like "sessions" was bizarre, and again enterprise features were paid.

        Decision

        We ultimately decided to roll our own using ExpressJS into Express Gateway because the use case for using ExpressJS as an #API #gateway was tried and true, in fact - all the enterprise features that the other two charge for #OAuth2 introspection etc were freely available within ExpressJS middleware.

        Outcome

        We opened source Express Gateway with a core set of plugins and the community started writing their own and could quickly do so by rolling lots of ExpressJS middleware into Express Gateway

        See more
        Stack Overflow logo

        Stack Overflow

        69K
        61K
        893
        Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
        69K
        61K
        + 1
        893
        PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
        • 257
          Scary smart community
        • 206
          Knows all
        • 142
          Voting system
        • 134
          Good questions
        • 83
          Good SEO
        • 22
          Addictive
        • 14
          Tight focus
        • 10
          Share and gain knowledge
        • 7
          Useful
        • 3
          Fast loading
        • 2
          Gamification
        • 1
          Knows everyone
        • 1
          Experts share experience and answer questions
        • 1
          Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
        • 1
          Questions answered quickly
        • 1
          No annoying ads
        • 1
          No spam
        • 1
          Fast community response
        • 1
          Good moderators
        • 1
          Quick answers from users
        • 1
          Good answers
        • 1
          User reputation ranking
        • 1
          Efficient answers
        • 1
          Leading developer community
        CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
        • 3
          Not welcoming to newbies
        • 3
          Unfair downvoting
        • 3
          Unfriendly moderators
        • 3
          No opinion based questions
        • 3
          Mean users
        • 2
          Limited to types of questions it can accept

        related Stack Overflow posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more