Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Aerospike vs Memcached: What are the differences?
Developers describe Aerospike as "Flash-optimized in-memory open source NoSQL database". Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees. On the other hand, Memcached is detailed as "High-performance, distributed memory object caching system". Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.
Aerospike and Memcached are primarily classified as "In-Memory Databases" and "Databases" tools respectively.
"Ram and/or ssd persistence " is the top reason why over 9 developers like Aerospike, while over 133 developers mention "Fast object cache" as the leading cause for choosing Memcached.
Aerospike and Memcached are both open source tools. It seems that Memcached with 9K GitHub stars and 2.6K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Aerospike with 296 GitHub stars and 55 GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Memcached has a broader approval, being mentioned in 755 company stacks & 267 developers stacks; compared to Aerospike, which is listed in 30 company stacks and 9 developer stacks.
Pros of Aerospike
- Ram and/or ssd persistence16
- Easy clustering support12
- Easy setup5
- Acid4
- Scale3
- Performance better than Redis3
- Petabyte Scale3
- Ease of use2
Pros of Memcached
- Fast object cache139
- High-performance129
- Stable91
- Mature65
- Distributed caching system33
- Improved response time and throughput11
- Great for caching HTML3
- Putta2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Aerospike
Cons of Memcached
- Only caches simple types2