Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Aerospike

200
285
+ 1
48
Redis

58.6K
45.1K
+ 1
3.9K
Add tool

Aerospike vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Aerospike and Redis. Both Aerospike and Redis are highly popular databases used for different purposes. Understanding their differences will help in choosing the most suitable option for specific use cases.

  1. Data Structure: Aerospike is a key-value store that supports the storage of complex serialized data structures, such as lists and maps, within a single value. On the other hand, Redis is an in-memory data structure store that supports various data structures, including strings, hashes, sets, lists, and more.

  2. Data Persistence: Aerospike supports both in-memory and durable storage options. It can persist data on disk and provide high availability even in the event of a node failure. Redis primarily focuses on in-memory storage but provides the ability to persist data to disk asynchronously or synchronously using different persistence options.

  3. Scalability: Aerospike is designed to scale horizontally and can distribute data across multiple nodes in a cluster seamlessly. Redis, on the other hand, was initially designed to be a single-threaded, in-memory database, but can also be clustered to achieve scalability by sharding data across multiple nodes.

  4. Performance: Aerospike is built with performance and low-latency in mind and is able to handle high throughput workloads efficiently. Redis is also known for its high performance and low latency, especially for read-heavy workloads, due to keeping the data in memory.

  5. Replication: Aerospike uses a strong consistency model for replication, ensuring that data is replicated synchronously across multiple nodes. Redis supports both asynchronous and synchronous replication, allowing flexibility in choosing the replication strategy based on specific use cases.

  6. Advanced Data Types: Redis offers a rich set of advanced data types and operations on those types, such as sorted sets, hyperloglogs, and bitmap operations. Aerospike, while also supporting complex data structures, does not have as extensive support for advanced data types as Redis.

In summary, Aerospike and Redis differ in terms of their supported data structure, data persistence options, scalability, performance, replication strategy, and support for advanced data types. Understanding these differences will help in choosing the appropriate database for specific use cases.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Aerospike
Pros of Redis
  • 16
    Ram and/or ssd persistence
  • 12
    Easy clustering support
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Acid
  • 3
    Petabyte Scale
  • 3
    Scale
  • 3
    Performance better than Redis
  • 2
    Ease of use
  • 886
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 513
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
  • 194
    Open source
  • 182
    Easy to deploy
  • 164
    Stable
  • 155
    Free
  • 121
    Fast
  • 42
    High-Performance
  • 40
    High Availability
  • 35
    Data Structures
  • 32
    Very Scalable
  • 24
    Replication
  • 22
    Great community
  • 22
    Pub/Sub
  • 19
    "NoSQL" key-value data store
  • 16
    Hashes
  • 13
    Sets
  • 11
    Sorted Sets
  • 10
    NoSQL
  • 10
    Lists
  • 9
    Async replication
  • 9
    BSD licensed
  • 8
    Bitmaps
  • 8
    Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background
  • 7
    Keys with a limited time-to-live
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 6
    Lua scripting
  • 6
    Strings
  • 5
    Awesomeness for Free
  • 5
    Hyperloglogs
  • 4
    Transactions
  • 4
    Outstanding performance
  • 4
    Runs server side LUA
  • 4
    LRU eviction of keys
  • 4
    Feature Rich
  • 4
    Written in ANSI C
  • 4
    Networked
  • 3
    Data structure server
  • 3
    Performance & ease of use
  • 2
    Dont save data if no subscribers are found
  • 2
    Automatic failover
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Temporarily kept on disk
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    Existing Laravel Integration
  • 2
    Channels concept
  • 2
    Object [key/value] size each 500 MB
  • 2
    Simple

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Aerospike
Cons of Redis
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 15
      Cannot query objects directly
    • 3
      No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
    • 1
      No WAL

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions