Amazon API Gateway vs Apigility vs Kong

Overview

Apigility

Stacks37

Followers105

Votes2

GitHub Stars442

Forks118

Kong

Stacks671

Followers1.5K

Votes139

GitHub Stars42.1K

Forks5.0K

Amazon API Gateway

Stacks1.4K

Followers1.1K

Votes45

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigility vs Kong: What are the differences?

Integration Level: Amazon API Gateway is more tightly integrated with AWS services, providing seamless integration with Lambda functions, DynamoDB, and other AWS resources. Apigility, on the other hand, is more framework-agnostic and can be used with various PHP frameworks. Kong offers a flexible and platform-agnostic solution, allowing integration with any backend service or API.
API Monitoring and Analytics: Amazon API Gateway and Kong offer built-in monitoring and analytics capabilities, providing detailed insights into API usage, performance, and errors. Apigility, while it offers logging and monitoring features, may require additional tooling for in-depth analytics and monitoring.
Authentication and Authorization: Amazon API Gateway provides robust authentication and authorization mechanisms, including AWS IAM roles and policies. Apigility offers authentication plugins for standard protocols like OAuth, JWT, and basic authentication. Kong excels in its support for various authentication plugins, allowing easy integration with OAuth, JWT, Key authentication, etc.
Deployment Flexibility: Amazon API Gateway is fully managed by AWS, offering ease of deployment and scaling. Apigility can be deployed on any PHP server, providing flexibility in deployment environments. Kong, being open-source, gives users the freedom to deploy it on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment.
API Rate Limiting and Throttling: Amazon API Gateway and Kong provide rate limiting and throttling controls out of the box, allowing users to manage API traffic effectively. Apigility, while it supports rate limiting, may require additional configuration or plugins for advanced throttling capabilities.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Apigility has a strong community support system and a variety of plugins and modules available, making it easier for developers to extend and customize their APIs. Amazon API Gateway benefits from the vast AWS ecosystem, providing seamless integration with various AWS services. Kong, being open-source, has a vibrant community contributing plugins, integrations, and resources to enhance its capabilities.

In Summary, Amazon API Gateway, Apigility, and Kong offer unique strengths in integration, monitoring, deployment, authentication, and rate limiting for API management solutions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apigility, Kong, Amazon API Gateway

Prateek

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apigility	Kong	Amazon API Gateway
An API-based architecture is essential to agile delivery of mobile applications. Apigility provides JSON representations that can be parsed and used in any mobile framework; write for the web or native applications simultaneously!	Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.	Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.
RESTful or RPC services; JSON (specifically, HAL); Problem Details for HTTP APIs; Versioning; Normalisation and Validation; Authentication (HTTP Basic/Digest, OAuth2); Documentation (HTML, Swagger).	Logging: Log requests and responses to your system over TCP, UDP or to disk; OAuth2.0: Add easily an OAuth2.0 authentication to your APIs; Monitoring: Live monitoring provides key load and performance server metrics; IP-restriction: Whitelist or blacklist IPs that can make requests; Authentication: Manage consumer credentials query string and header tokens; Rate-limiting: Block and throttle requests based on IP or authentication; Transformations: Add, remove or manipulate HTTP params and headers on-the-fly; CORS: Enable cross-origin requests to your APIs that would otherwise be blocked; Anything: Need custom functionality? Extend Kong with your own Lua plugins;	Build, Deploy and Manage APIs; Resiliency;API Lifecycle Management;SDK Generation;API Operations Monitoring;AWS Authorization;API Keys for Third-Party Developers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 442	GitHub Stars 42.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 118	GitHub Forks 5.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 37	Stacks 671	Stacks 1.4K
Followers 105	Followers 1.5K	Followers 1.1K
Votes 2	Votes 139	Votes 45
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Follows Standards, Easy to Use, Design Patterns Used 1 Active dev community, full-featured, REST + RPC	Pros 37 Easy to maintain 32 Easy to install 26 Flexible 21 Great performance 7 Api blueprint	Pros 37 AWS Integration 7 Websockets 1 Serverless Cons 2 No websocket broadcast 1 Less expensive
Integrations
PHP	Cassandra Docker Prometheus Kubernetes PostgreSQL NGINX Vagrant	AWS Lambda Amazon CloudWatch

What are some alternatives to Apigility, Kong, Amazon API Gateway?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Tyk Cloud

Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Related Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigility vs Kong: What are the differences?

Integration Level: Amazon API Gateway is more tightly integrated with AWS services, providing seamless integration with Lambda functions, DynamoDB, and other AWS resources. Apigility, on the other hand, is more framework-agnostic and can be used with various PHP frameworks. Kong offers a flexible and platform-agnostic solution, allowing integration with any backend service or API.
API Monitoring and Analytics: Amazon API Gateway and Kong offer built-in monitoring and analytics capabilities, providing detailed insights into API usage, performance, and errors. Apigility, while it offers logging and monitoring features, may require additional tooling for in-depth analytics and monitoring.
Authentication and Authorization: Amazon API Gateway provides robust authentication and authorization mechanisms, including AWS IAM roles and policies. Apigility offers authentication plugins for standard protocols like OAuth, JWT, and basic authentication. Kong excels in its support for various authentication plugins, allowing easy integration with OAuth, JWT, Key authentication, etc.
Deployment Flexibility: Amazon API Gateway is fully managed by AWS, offering ease of deployment and scaling. Apigility can be deployed on any PHP server, providing flexibility in deployment environments. Kong, being open-source, gives users the freedom to deploy it on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment.
API Rate Limiting and Throttling: Amazon API Gateway and Kong provide rate limiting and throttling controls out of the box, allowing users to manage API traffic effectively. Apigility, while it supports rate limiting, may require additional configuration or plugins for advanced throttling capabilities.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Apigility has a strong community support system and a variety of plugins and modules available, making it easier for developers to extend and customize their APIs. Amazon API Gateway benefits from the vast AWS ecosystem, providing seamless integration with various AWS services. Kong, being open-source, has a vibrant community contributing plugins, integrations, and resources to enhance its capabilities.

In Summary, Amazon API Gateway, Apigility, and Kong offer unique strengths in integration, monitoring, deployment, authentication, and rate limiting for API management solutions.

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigility vs Kong

Overview