StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Gateway
  5. AWS WAF vs Amazon API Gateway

AWS WAF vs Amazon API Gateway

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.1K
Votes45
AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Stacks164
Followers191
Votes0

AWS WAF vs Amazon API Gateway: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS WAF and Amazon API Gateway are two services offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provide different functionalities for managing and securing web applications. Here are the key differences between AWS WAF and Amazon API Gateway:

  1. Deployment and Integration Approach: AWS WAF is primarily a web application firewall service that integrates with Application Load Balancers (ALBs), CloudFront distributions, and Amazon API Gateway. It allows you to protect web applications at the HTTP and HTTPS protocol layers. On the other hand, Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that enables you to create, deploy, and manage APIs. It functions as a front-end to your backend services, allowing you to control access, implement security restrictions, and handle API traffic. While AWS WAF focuses on security, Amazon API Gateway focuses on API management.

  2. Functionality: AWS WAF provides a set of rules and conditions to define how to handle web requests, such as blocking requests with malicious intent or excessive traffic. It offers protection against common web exploits, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. Whereas, Amazon API Gateway primarily enables you to create RESTful APIs or WebSocket APIs, offering functionalities like request validation, transformation, and authorization. It can also handle tasks like request and response mappings, caching, and throttling.

  3. Scalability: AWS WAF is designed to scale automatically to handle high traffic volumes and distributed attacks. It can distribute the workload across multiple AWS Availability Zones and automatically scales up to handle incoming requests efficiently. In contrast, Amazon API Gateway also provides automatic scaling capabilities, allowing you to handle a high number of API requests across multiple availability zones. It scales based on the demands of the incoming API traffic.

  4. Pricing: AWS WAF offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the number of web requests processed, rules applied, and data processed. The cost varies depending on the region and the scale of your applications. Amazon API Gateway also uses the pay-as-you-go pricing model, but it is based on the number of API calls, data transfer, caching, and other associated features. The pricing for Amazon API Gateway also varies based on the AWS region and the usage patterns.

  5. Logging and Monitoring: AWS WAF provides detailed logging capabilities to monitor web requests, allowing you to analyze and identify potential threat patterns. It integrates with Amazon CloudWatch, which provides metrics, logs, and alarms for monitoring the performance and security of your applications. Amazon API Gateway also integrates with CloudWatch, allowing you to monitor API usage, error rates, latencies, and other performance metrics. It provides enhanced logging functionalities, enabling you to capture API-level logs that include information about the request and response payloads.

  6. Integration with AWS Services: AWS WAF can integrate with other AWS services like AWS Shield for DDoS protection, AWS Lambda for custom security rules, and AWS Firewall Manager for centralized management across accounts and applications. Amazon API Gateway can integrate with various AWS services as well, such as AWS Lambda for serverless backend implementation, AWS IAM for authentication and authorization, AWS Cognito for user management, and AWS DynamoDB for data storage.

In summary, AWS WAF focuses on providing web application security features to protect against common web exploits and attacks, while Amazon API Gateway emphasizes API management capabilities, allowing you to create, deploy, and manage APIs with features like request validation, transformation, and authorization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway
AWS WAF
AWS WAF

Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.

Build, Deploy and Manage APIs; Resiliency;API Lifecycle Management;SDK Generation;API Operations Monitoring;AWS Authorization;API Keys for Third-Party Developers
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
164
Followers
1.1K
Followers
191
Votes
45
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    AWS Integration
  • 7
    Websockets
  • 1
    Serverless
Cons
  • 2
    No websocket broadcast
  • 1
    Less expensive
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon API Gateway, AWS WAF?

Kong

Kong

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Tyk Cloud

Tyk Cloud

Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Moesif

Moesif

Build a winning API platform with instant, meaningful visibility into API usage and customer adoption

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope