Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL Managed Instance

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon Aurora

807
741
+ 1
55
Azure SQL Managed Instance

12
27
+ 1
0
Add tool

Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL Managed Instance: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Amazon Aurora and Azure SQL Managed Instance, there are key differences that companies should consider when choosing a database solution for their operations.

1. Performance and Scalability: Amazon Aurora is known for its high performance and scalability, offering up to five times better performance than standard MySQL databases. On the other hand, Azure SQL Managed Instance provides consistent performance and scalability with options for automatic scaling based on workload requirements.

2. Pricing Structure: Amazon Aurora follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing customers to pay only for the storage and resources they use. In contrast, Azure SQL Managed Instance offers a more complex pricing structure with options for reservation and capacity-based models, providing flexibility but also requiring careful consideration of cost implications.

3. Data Replication: Amazon Aurora provides an option for global database replication, enabling data to be replicated across multiple regions for high availability and disaster recovery. Azure SQL Managed Instance also supports data replication but with more limited global replication capabilities compared to Amazon Aurora.

4. Integration with Other Services: Both Amazon Aurora and Azure SQL Managed Instance offer integration with other cloud services within their respective ecosystems, such as AWS Lambda for Aurora and Azure Functions for SQL Managed Instance. However, the level of integration and ease of use may vary between the two platforms.

5. Backup and Recovery Options: Amazon Aurora offers continuous backup with point-in-time recovery, allowing for quick restores to specific timestamps. Azure SQL Managed Instance also provides backup and restore capabilities but with different options for retention periods and recovery mechanisms, requiring careful planning for disaster recovery scenarios.

6. Management and Monitoring Tools: Amazon Aurora provides robust management and monitoring tools, such as Amazon RDS Performance Insights, for optimizing database performance. Azure SQL Managed Instance offers similar tools like Azure SQL Database Advisor for performance tuning and recommendations, but the user experience and feature set may differ.

In Summary, Amazon Aurora and Azure SQL Managed Instance differ in performance, pricing, data replication, integration with other services, backup and recovery options, and management tools for database optimization.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon Aurora
Pros of Azure SQL Managed Instance
  • 14
    MySQL compatibility
  • 12
    Better performance
  • 10
    Easy read scalability
  • 9
    Speed
  • 7
    Low latency read replica
  • 2
    High IOPS cost
  • 1
    Good cost performance
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Amazon Aurora
    Cons of Azure SQL Managed Instance
    • 2
      Vendor locking
    • 1
      Rigid schema
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Amazon Aurora?

      Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.

      What is Azure SQL Managed Instance?

      It is the intelligent, scalable cloud database service that combines the broadest SQL Server database engine compatibility with all the benefits of a fully managed and evergreen platform as a service.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Amazon Aurora?
      What companies use Azure SQL Managed Instance?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Amazon Aurora?
      What tools integrate with Azure SQL Managed Instance?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
      6
      2754
      GitHubPythonNode.js+47
      55
      72765
      What are some alternatives to Amazon Aurora and Azure SQL Managed Instance?
      MySQL
      The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      Redis
      Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
      Amazon S3
      Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
      See all alternatives