Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon Cognito vs Devise: What are the differences?
Key differences between Amazon Cognito and Devise
Amazon Cognito and Devise are both popular authentication and user management solutions, but they have some key differences. Here are six of the most significant differences between the two:
Integration with Cloud Services: One of the major advantages of Amazon Cognito is its seamless integration with other Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud services. It provides built-in support for integrating with services like Amazon S3, Amazon DynamoDB, and AWS AppSync. On the other hand, Devise is not specifically designed for cloud integration and requires additional configuration for such integrations.
Scalability and High Availability: Amazon Cognito is a fully managed service provided by AWS, offering high scalability and availability. It automatically handles the infrastructure and scales based on demand, ensuring reliable authentication and user management even during peak loads. Devise, on the other hand, relies on the underlying framework's scalability and availability features, which may not be as robust as a dedicated service like Amazon Cognito.
Multifactor Authentication (MFA): Amazon Cognito provides out-of-the-box support for implementing multifactor authentication (MFA) in your applications. It supports various MFA options such as SMS, email, and time-based one-time passwords. Devise, on the other hand, does not include built-in support for MFA and requires additional customization to implement this feature.
User Pools and Identity Pools: Amazon Cognito offers two types of pools: user pools and identity pools. User pools are used for user registration, authentication, and user management. Identity pools, on the other hand, are used for providing temporary AWS credentials to users for accessing AWS services directly. Devise, on the other hand, does not provide these pools and requires additional development effort to implement similar functionality.
Serverless Architecture: Amazon Cognito fits well into serverless architectures, where backend services are built using AWS Lambda, API Gateway, and other serverless technologies. It can be easily integrated with these services to provide authentication and authorization capabilities. In contrast, Devise is mainly used within traditional server-based applications and may not be as suitable for serverless architectures.
Pricing Model: The pricing models of Amazon Cognito and Devise differ significantly. Amazon Cognito charges based on the number of monthly active users and the amount of data stored, with additional charges for advanced features like MFA and SMS delivery. Devise, on the other hand, is an open-source library and does not have any direct cost associated with it. The cost of using Devise is primarily related to the infrastructure and resources required to run the underlying application.
In summary, Amazon Cognito offers seamless integration with AWS cloud services, scalable and highly available architecture, built-in support for MFA, user pools, and identity pools, compatibility with serverless architectures, and a pricing model based on usage. Devise, on the other hand, requires additional configuration for cloud integrations, relies on the underlying framework's scalability and availability, lacks built-in MFA support, does not provide user pools or identity pools, may not fit well into serverless architectures, and has no direct cost associated with it.
I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.
When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.
The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.