Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon DocumentDB

74
62
+ 1
0
Elasticsearch

34.6K
26.9K
+ 1
1.6K
Add tool

Amazon DocumentDB vs Elasticsearch: What are the differences?

  1. Data Model: Amazon DocumentDB is a fully managed document database service that supports MongoDB workloads, with JSON-like documents. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is a search engine that indexes and searches unstructured content. While DocumentDB is specifically designed for document-oriented data, Elasticsearch is more oriented towards full-text search and analytics tasks.
  2. Query Language: DocumentDB uses the MongoDB query language, which is intuitive for developers familiar with MongoDB. Elasticsearch uses a query language based on JSON, which allows for complex queries including fuzzy searches, wildcard searches, and more. The query language in Elasticsearch offers more advanced search capabilities compared to DocumentDB.
  3. Scalability: Amazon DocumentDB is designed for horizontal scalability where users can add read replicas to distribute read traffic. Elasticsearch is designed for horizontal scalability for large-scale data, with support for sharding and replication to distribute data across nodes in a cluster. Elasticsearch is more suited for scenarios where massive data processing is required.
  4. Analytics Capabilities: Elasticsearch is built for real-time analytics, log analysis, and full-text search use cases, providing powerful aggregations, filtering, and sorting capabilities. Amazon DocumentDB lacks some advanced analytical features provided by Elasticsearch, making it less suitable for advanced analytics workloads.
  5. Indexing and Searching: Elasticsearch includes built-in indexing and searching features that are optimized for speed and efficiency. Amazon DocumentDB relies on indexes to improve query performance, but may not provide the same level of advanced search capabilities as Elasticsearch. Elasticsearch excels in indexing and searching documents across large datasets efficiently.
  6. Community Support: Elasticsearch has a large and active open-source community, offering a wide range of plugins, integrations, and support resources. Amazon DocumentDB, being a managed service, may have limited community support compared to Elasticsearch, which can impact the availability of resources and expertise for troubleshooting.

In Summary, Amazon DocumentDB is tailored for document-oriented workloads with MongoDB compatibility, while Elasticsearch is focused on real-time analytics, search, and scalability with advanced indexing and searching capabilities.

Advice on Amazon DocumentDB and Elasticsearch
Rana Usman Shahid
Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza · | 6 upvotes · 391.7K views
Needs advice
on
AlgoliaAlgoliaElasticsearchElasticsearch
and
FirebaseFirebase

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

See more
Replies (2)
Josh Dzielak
Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit · | 8 upvotes · 294K views
Recommends
on
AlgoliaAlgolia

Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.

To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.

See more
Mike Endale
Recommends
on
Cloud FirestoreCloud Firestore

Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.

For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.

Hope this helps.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon DocumentDB
Pros of Elasticsearch
  • 0
    Storage elasticity
  • 0
    Scalable
  • 0
    Easy Setup
  • 328
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
  • 98
    Free
  • 85
    Search everything
  • 54
    Easy to get started
  • 45
    Analytics
  • 26
    Distributed
  • 6
    Fast search
  • 5
    More than a search engine
  • 4
    Great docs
  • 4
    Awesome, great tool
  • 3
    Highly Available
  • 3
    Easy to scale
  • 2
    Potato
  • 2
    Document Store
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Intuitive API
  • 2
    Nosql DB
  • 2
    Great piece of software
  • 2
    Reliable
  • 2
    Fast
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Open
  • 1
    Easy to get hot data
  • 1
    Github
  • 1
    Elaticsearch
  • 1
    Actively developing
  • 1
    Responsive maintainers on GitHub
  • 1
    Ecosystem
  • 1
    Not stable
  • 1
    Scalability
  • 0
    Community

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon DocumentDB
Cons of Elasticsearch
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 7
      Resource hungry
    • 6
      Diffecult to get started
    • 5
      Expensive
    • 4
      Hard to keep stable at large scale

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Amazon DocumentDB?

    Amazon DocumentDB is a non-relational database service designed from the ground-up to give you the performance, scalability, and availability you need when operating mission-critical MongoDB workloads at scale. In Amazon DocumentDB, the storage and compute are decoupled, allowing each to scale independently, and you can increase the read capacity to millions of requests per second by adding up to 15 low latency read replicas in minutes, regardless of the size of your data.

    What is Elasticsearch?

    Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon DocumentDB?
    What companies use Elasticsearch?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon DocumentDB?
    What tools integrate with Elasticsearch?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    May 21 2019 at 12:20AM

    Elastic

    ElasticsearchKibanaLogstash+4
    12
    5305
    GitHubPythonReact+42
    49
    40945
    GitHubPythonNode.js+47
    55
    72827
    What are some alternatives to Amazon DocumentDB and Elasticsearch?
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    MongoDB Atlas
    MongoDB Atlas is a global cloud database service built and run by the team behind MongoDB. Enjoy the flexibility and scalability of a document database, with the ease and automation of a fully managed service on your preferred cloud.
    Atlas
    Atlas is one foundation to manage and provide visibility to your servers, containers, VMs, configuration management, service discovery, and additional operations services.
    Amazon DynamoDB
    With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    See all alternatives