StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon SQS

Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon SQS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Stacks2.8K
Followers2.0K
Votes171

Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon SQS: What are the differences?

Introduction: Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon SQS are both services provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for different purposes. While DynamoDB is a managed NoSQL database service, SQS is a fully managed message queuing service. Despite being part of the AWS ecosystem, there are significant differences between DynamoDB and SQS.

  1. Data Storage vs Message Queuing: The key difference between DynamoDB and SQS lies in their primary functionality. DynamoDB is designed for storing and retrieving structured and semi-structured data, offering a highly scalable and fast access database solution. On the other hand, SQS is a message queue service focused on decoupling and distributing messages between different components of a distributed system. It provides reliable and scalable message exchange between microservices and applications.

  2. Data Structure: DynamoDB follows a schema-less data model, allowing you to create tables without defining a fixed schema upfront. This flexibility makes it easy to handle evolving data requirements. In contrast, SQS does not store data persistently like a database but rather acts as a temporary repository for messages. Messages sent to SQS are stored until they are consumed, empowering asynchronous communication patterns in distributed systems.

  3. Real-time vs Event-driven: DynamoDB is optimized for real-time data access and is capable of serving millions of requests per second with low latency. It can handle high read and write throughput requirements for dynamic workloads. In comparison, SQS excels in event-driven architectures, where components can communicate asynchronously by sending and receiving messages. It provides benefits such as scalability and fault tolerance by enabling loose coupling between services.

  4. Data Size and Complexity: DynamoDB supports complex data structures, including nested attributes, arrays, and maps, allowing you to store and query rich document-like data. It also provides features like automatic data partitioning and global secondary indexes for efficient and scalable data management. In contrast, SQS has a simple message structure and is primarily used for passing small-sized messages between different services or components.

  5. Data Consistency: DynamoDB offers two consistency models: eventually consistent and strongly consistent reads. Eventually consistent reads maximize availability and offer the lowest latency, while strongly consistent reads provide a more up-to-date view of the data. On the other hand, SQS guarantees the order of messages within a single queue but does not provide strong consistency across multiple queues. It ensures "at least once" delivery semantics, where a message might be delivered multiple times but not skipped.

  6. Cost and Pricing Model: DynamoDB pricing is primarily based on throughput capacity (read and write), storage, and data transfer. It offers different options for provisioned capacity and on-demand capacity modes, allowing you to optimize costs based on your application requirements. SQS pricing mainly depends on the number of requests and message retention. It offers different types of queues, including standard and FIFO (First-In-First-Out), with varying features and pricing.

In summary, Amazon DynamoDB is a managed NoSQL database for structured data storage and real-time access, while Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queuing service for reliable and asynchronous communication between components. DynamoDB offers schema-less data storage, real-time querying, and flexible data models, whereas SQS focuses on decoupling services through message-based communication, ensuring fault tolerance and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon SQS

Pulkit
Pulkit

Software Engineer

Oct 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoAmazon SQSAmazon SQSRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Hi! I am creating a scraping system in Django, which involves long running tasks between 1 minute & 1 Day. As I am new to Message Brokers and Task Queues, I need advice on which architecture to use for my system. ( Amazon SQS, RabbitMQ, or Celery). The system should be autoscalable using Kubernetes(K8) based on the number of pending tasks in the queue.

474k views474k
Comments
Doru
Doru

Solution Architect

Jun 9, 2019

ReviewonAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

I use Amazon DynamoDB because it integrates seamlessly with other AWS SaaS solutions and if cost is the primary concern early on, then this will be a better choice when compared to AWS RDS or any other solution that requires the creation of a HA cluster of IaaS components that will cost money just for being there, the costs not being influenced primarily by usage.

1.37k views1.37k
Comments
Meili
Meili

Software engineer at Digital Science

Sep 24, 2020

Needs adviceonZeroMQZeroMQRabbitMQRabbitMQAmazon SQSAmazon SQS

Hi, we are in a ZMQ set up in a push/pull pattern, and we currently start to have more traffic and cases that the service is unavailable or stuck. We want to:

  • Not loose messages in services outages
  • Safely restart service without losing messages (@{ZeroMQ}|tool:1064| seems to need to close the socket in the receiver before restart manually)

Do you have experience with this setup with ZeroMQ? Would you suggest RabbitMQ or Amazon SQS (we are in AWS setup) instead? Something else?

Thank you for your time

500k views500k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
A queue can be created in any region.;The message payload can contain up to 256KB of text in any format. Each 64KB ‘chunk’ of payload is billed as 1 request. For example, a single API call with a 256KB payload will be billed as four requests.;Messages can be sent, received or deleted in batches of up to 10 messages or 256KB. Batches cost the same amount as single messages, meaning SQS can be even more cost effective for customers that use batching.;Long polling reduces extraneous polling to help you minimize cost while receiving new messages as quickly as possible. When your queue is empty, long-poll requests wait up to 20 seconds for the next message to arrive. Long poll requests cost the same amount as regular requests.;Messages can be retained in queues for up to 14 days.;Messages can be sent and read simultaneously.;Developers can get started with Amazon SQS by using only five APIs: CreateQueue, SendMessage, ReceiveMessage, ChangeMessageVisibility, and DeleteMessage. Additional APIs are available to provide advanced functionality.
Statistics
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
2.8K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
2.0K
Votes
195
Votes
171
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Scaling
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
Pros
  • 62
    Easy to use, reliable
  • 40
    Low cost
  • 28
    Simple
  • 14
    Doesn't need to maintain it
  • 8
    It is Serverless
Cons
  • 2
    Has a max message size (currently 256K)
  • 2
    Difficult to configure
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 1
    Has a maximum 15 minutes of delayed messages only
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon SQS?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase