Amazon EC2 vs Jelastic

Overview

Amazon EC2

Stacks48.6K

Followers36.0K

Votes2.5K

Jelastic

Stacks38

Followers60

Votes74

Amazon EC2 vs Jelastic: What are the differences?

<Amazon EC2 vs Jelastic>

1. **Pricing Model**: Amazon EC2 charges users based on the resources consumed, such as compute capacity, data transfer, and storage. In contrast, Jelastic utilizes a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users only pay for the resources utilized without any upfront commitments or long-term contracts, making it more cost-effective for variable workloads. 

2. **Resource Flexibility**: Amazon EC2 provides users with the ability to customize virtual machines (VMs) by selecting specific CPU, memory, and storage configurations. On the other hand, Jelastic offers a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution with auto-scaling capabilities, allowing users to effortlessly adjust resources based on application demands without manual intervention, providing greater flexibility and scalability.

3. **Application Deployment**: Amazon EC2 requires users to manage the deployment of applications onto their virtual servers, including setting up environments and configuring software dependencies. Conversely, Jelastic simplifies application deployment by offering pre-configured containers and one-click deployment options, streamlining the process and reducing deployment time significantly.

4. **Managed Services**: Amazon EC2 primarily focuses on Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) offerings, requiring users to handle server management tasks such as security patching, monitoring, and backups. In contrast, Jelastic provides a managed hosting platform with built-in support for automatic updates, monitoring, and troubleshooting, relieving users of the burden of managing infrastructure and allowing them to focus on developing their applications.

5. **Scalability**: Amazon EC2 allows users to manually scale resources by adding or removing VM instances based on demand, requiring proactive monitoring and adjustments. Meanwhile, Jelastic offers automated horizontal scaling capabilities, which dynamically adjust resource allocation based on application load, ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization without user intervention.

6. **Multi-Cloud Support**: Jelastic supports multi-cloud deployments, allowing users to seamlessly migrate and run their applications across different cloud providers to prevent vendor lock-in and optimize performance and cost efficiency. In contrast, Amazon EC2 is predominantly tied to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, limiting flexibility for users who desire a multi-cloud strategy or require specific cloud provider features.

In Summary, Amazon EC2 and Jelastic differ in pricing models, resource flexibility, application deployment processes, managed services, scalability options, and multi-cloud support capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon EC2, Jelastic

Craig

Principal Consultant at Rootwork InfoTech LLC

Jul 16, 2020

Decided

We first selected Google Cloud Platform about five years ago, because HIPAA compliance was significantly cheaper and easier on Google compared to AWS. We have stayed with Google Cloud because it provides an excellent command line tool for managing resources, and every resource has a well-designed, well-documented API. SDKs for most of these APIs are available for many popular languages. I have never worked with a cloud platform that's so amenable to automation. Google is also ahead of its competitors in Kubernetes support.

200k views200k

Comments

Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Needs advice

DigitalOcean was where I began; its USD5/month is extremely competitive and the overall experience as highly user-friendly.

However, their offerings were lacking and integrating with other resources I had on AWS was getting more costly (due to transfer costs on AWS). Eventually I moved the entire project off DO's Droplets and onto AWS's EC2.

One may initially find the cost (w/o free tier) and interface of AWS daunting however with good planning you can achieve highly cost-efficient systems with savings plans, spot instances, etcetera.

Do not dive into AWS head-first! Seriously, don't. Stand back and read pricing documentation thoroughly. You can, not to the fault of AWS, easily go way overbudget. Your first action upon getting your AWS account should be to set up billing alarms for estimated and current bill totals.

264k views264k

Comments

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Most bioinformatics shops nowadays are hosting on AWS or Azure, since they have HIPAA tiers and offer enterprise SLA contracts. Meanwhile Heroku hasn't historically supported HIPAA. Rackspace and Google Cloud would be other hosting providers we would consider, but we just don't get requests for them. So, we mostly focus on AWS and Azure support.

156k views156k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EC2	Jelastic
It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.	Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.
Elastic – Amazon EC2 enables you to increase or decrease capacity within minutes, not hours or days. You can commission one, hundreds or even thousands of server instances simultaneously.;Completely Controlled – You have complete control of your instances. You have root access to each one, and you can interact with them as you would any machine.;Flexible – You have the choice of multiple instance types, operating systems, and software packages. Amazon EC2 allows you to select a configuration of memory, CPU, instance storage, and the boot partition size that is optimal for your choice of operating system and application.;Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services – Amazon EC2 works in conjunction with Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS), Amazon SimpleDB and Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to provide a complete solution for computing, query processing and storage across a wide range of applications.;Reliable – Amazon EC2 offers a highly reliable environment where replacement instances can be rapidly and predictably commissioned. The Amazon EC2 Service Level Agreement commitment is 99.95% availability for each Amazon EC2 Region.;Secure – Amazon EC2 works in conjunction with Amazon VPC to provide security and robust networking functionality for your compute resources.;Inexpensive – Amazon EC2 passes on to you the financial benefits of Amazon’s scale. You pay a very low rate for the compute capacity you actually consume.;Easy to Start – Quickly get started with Amazon EC2 by visiting AWS Marketplace to choose preconfigured software on Amazon Machine Images (AMIs). You can quickly deploy this software to EC2 via 1-Click launch or with the EC2 console.	Public, Private, Hybrid and Multi-Cloud deployments;Support of microservices and legacy applications with zero code changes;Automated continuous integration, delivery and upgrade processes;More than 50 certified containers out-of-the-box;Managed multi-tenant Kubernetes and Docker containers support;Automatic vertical and horizontal scaling according to applications load;Superb developer web portal for easy provisioning, scaling and updating environments;Open API, CLI and SSH access;Automated replication for application servers and databases;Comprehensive billing engine, quotas and access control policies
Statistics
Stacks 48.6K	Stacks 38
Followers 36.0K	Followers 60
Votes 2.5K	Votes 74
Pros & Cons
Pros 647 Quick and reliable cloud servers 515 Scalability 393 Easy management 277 Low cost 271 Auto-scaling Cons 14 Ui could use a lot of work 6 High learning curve when compared to PaaS 3 Extremely poor CPU performance	Pros 13 Automatic scaling 12 Managed hosting 12 Pay-per-Use on an hourly basis 8 Constantly evolving 6 Multiple hosting providers
Integrations
No integrations available	Spring Boot Jenkins Kubernetes Docker WordPress PostgreSQL NGINX MongoDB Cassandra GitLab

What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2, Jelastic?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

DigitalOcean

We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Microsoft Azure

Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

Linode

Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Scaleway

European cloud computing company proposing a complete & simple public cloud ecosystem, bare-metal servers & private datacenter infrastructures.

Related Comparisons

Amazon EC2 vs Jelastic: What are the differences?

<Amazon EC2 vs Jelastic>

1. **Pricing Model**: Amazon EC2 charges users based on the resources consumed, such as compute capacity, data transfer, and storage. In contrast, Jelastic utilizes a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users only pay for the resources utilized without any upfront commitments or long-term contracts, making it more cost-effective for variable workloads. 

2. **Resource Flexibility**: Amazon EC2 provides users with the ability to customize virtual machines (VMs) by selecting specific CPU, memory, and storage configurations. On the other hand, Jelastic offers a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution with auto-scaling capabilities, allowing users to effortlessly adjust resources based on application demands without manual intervention, providing greater flexibility and scalability.

3. **Application Deployment**: Amazon EC2 requires users to manage the deployment of applications onto their virtual servers, including setting up environments and configuring software dependencies. Conversely, Jelastic simplifies application deployment by offering pre-configured containers and one-click deployment options, streamlining the process and reducing deployment time significantly.

4. **Managed Services**: Amazon EC2 primarily focuses on Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) offerings, requiring users to handle server management tasks such as security patching, monitoring, and backups. In contrast, Jelastic provides a managed hosting platform with built-in support for automatic updates, monitoring, and troubleshooting, relieving users of the burden of managing infrastructure and allowing them to focus on developing their applications.

5. **Scalability**: Amazon EC2 allows users to manually scale resources by adding or removing VM instances based on demand, requiring proactive monitoring and adjustments. Meanwhile, Jelastic offers automated horizontal scaling capabilities, which dynamically adjust resource allocation based on application load, ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization without user intervention.

6. **Multi-Cloud Support**: Jelastic supports multi-cloud deployments, allowing users to seamlessly migrate and run their applications across different cloud providers to prevent vendor lock-in and optimize performance and cost efficiency. In contrast, Amazon EC2 is predominantly tied to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, limiting flexibility for users who desire a multi-cloud strategy or require specific cloud provider features.

In Summary, Amazon EC2 and Jelastic differ in pricing models, resource flexibility, application deployment processes, managed services, scalability options, and multi-cloud support capabilities.

Amazon EC2 vs Jelastic

Overview