Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon GuardDuty vs Grafana: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Amazon GuardDuty and Grafana, highlighting their key differences.
Data Source: Amazon GuardDuty is a cloud security service that provides threat detection and continuous monitoring for AWS cloud accounts. It analyzes data from various AWS services, such as CloudTrail logs, VPC Flow Logs, and DNS logs, to identify and prioritize potential security issues. On the other hand, Grafana is an open-source analytics and monitoring platform that supports multiple data sources, including databases, cloud services, and custom applications. It allows users to visualize and analyze data from different sources in real-time.
Visualization Capabilities: Amazon GuardDuty focuses primarily on security threat detection and provides pre-built visualizations and dashboards specific to security monitoring. It offers easy-to-understand visual representations of detected threats and anomalies. In contrast, Grafana is a more versatile tool for data visualization and offers a wide range of visualization options, including graphs, charts, tables, and alerting functionalities. It provides greater flexibility for creating custom dashboards and visualizing data from various sources.
Integration and Compatibility: Amazon GuardDuty integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, enabling automated responses to detected threats through AWS Lambda functions or Amazon CloudWatch Events. It is designed specifically for AWS environments and fully utilizes the capabilities of AWS Cloud. Grafana, on the other hand, supports integration with multiple data sources, including AWS services, databases, and third-party applications. It provides a unified platform for monitoring and visualizing data from various sources, making it suitable for hybrid or multi-cloud environments.
Alerting and Notification: Amazon GuardDuty automatically generates alerts and notifications for detected threats and anomalies. It can send notifications via Amazon SNS, AWS Security Hub, or AWS CloudWatch Events. Grafana also supports alerting and notification functionalities but requires additional configuration and setup. It allows users to define alert conditions based on data thresholds or patterns and send notifications via various channels such as email, Slack, or PagerDuty.
Pricing Model: Amazon GuardDuty is a managed service provided by AWS and follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model. The cost is based on the volume of analyzed data and the number of findings generated. Grafana, on the other hand, is an open-source software that can be self-hosted or used as a cloud service. The pricing for Grafana varies depending on the deployment method, additional plugins or features, and any associated infrastructure costs.
Community and Extensibility: Amazon GuardDuty is a proprietary service provided by AWS and does not have an active open-source community. It is limited to the features and enhancements provided by AWS. Grafana, being an open-source platform, has a vibrant community of developers and users contributing to its development and adding new features. It also has a wide range of community-supported plugins and integrations, allowing for easy extensibility and customization.
In summary, Amazon GuardDuty is a specialized cloud security service focused on threat detection and monitoring within AWS environments. Grafana, on the other hand, is a versatile analytics and monitoring platform that supports multiple data sources and offers extensive visualization options. GuardDuty provides integrated security monitoring with automated responses, while Grafana offers flexibility, customization, and extensibility with a broader range of integration options.
Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:
- Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
- Able to display automation test results,
- System monitoring / Nginx API,
- Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.
Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.
You can look out for Prometheus Instrumentation (https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/instrumentation/) Client Library available in various languages https://prometheus.io/docs/instrumenting/clientlibs/ to create the custom metric you need for AS4000 and then Grafana can query the newly instrumented metric to show on the dashboard.
We're looking for a Monitoring and Logging tool. It has to support AWS (mostly 100% serverless, Lambdas, SNS, SQS, API GW, CloudFront, Autora, etc.), as well as Azure and GCP (for now mostly used as pure IaaS, with a lot of cognitive services, and mostly managed DB). Hopefully, something not as expensive as Datadog or New relic, as our SRE team could support the tool inhouse. At the moment, we primarily use CloudWatch for AWS and Pandora for most on-prem.
I worked with Datadog at least one year and my position is that commercial tools like Datadog are the best option to consolidate and analyze your metrics. Obviously, if you can't pay the tool, the best free options are the mix of Prometheus with their Alert Manager and Grafana to visualize (that are complementary not substitutable). But I think that no use a good tool it's finally more expensive that use a not really good implementation of free tools and you will pay also to maintain its.
this is quite affordable and provides what you seem to be looking for. you can see a whole thing about the APM space here https://www.apmexperts.com/observability/ranking-the-observability-offerings/
From a StackShare Community member: “We need better analytics & insights into our Elasticsearch cluster. Grafana, which ships with advanced support for Elasticsearch, looks great but isn’t officially supported/endorsed by Elastic. Kibana, on the other hand, is made and supported by Elastic. I’m wondering what people suggest in this situation."
For our Predictive Analytics platform, we have used both Grafana and Kibana
- Grafana based demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdTB2AcU4Sg
- Kibana based reporting screenshot: https://imgur.com/vuVvZKN
Kibana has predictions and ML algorithms support, so if you need them, you may be better off with Kibana . The multi-variate analysis features it provide are very unique (not available in Grafana).
For everything else, definitely Grafana . Especially the number of supported data sources, and plugins clearly makes Grafana a winner (in just visualization and reporting sense). Creating your own plugin is also very easy. The top pros of Grafana (which it does better than Kibana ) are:
- Creating and organizing visualization panels
- Templating the panels on dashboards for repetetive tasks
- Realtime monitoring, filtering of charts based on conditions and variables
- Export / Import in JSON format (that allows you to version and save your dashboard as part of git)
I use both Kibana and Grafana on my workplace: Kibana for logging and Grafana for monitoring. Since you already work with Elasticsearch, I think Kibana is the safest choice in terms of ease of use and variety of messages it can manage, while Grafana has still (in my opinion) a strong link to metrics
After looking for a way to monitor or at least get a better overview of our infrastructure, we found out that Grafana (which I previously only used in ELK stacks) has a plugin available to fully integrate with Amazon CloudWatch . Which makes it way better for our use-case than the offer of the different competitors (most of them are even paid). There is also a CloudFlare plugin available, the platform we use to serve our DNS requests. Although we are a big fan of https://smashing.github.io/ (previously dashing), for now we are starting with Grafana .
I use Kibana because it ships with the ELK stack. I don't find it as powerful as Splunk however it is light years above grepping through log files. We previously used Grafana but found it to be annoying to maintain a separate tool outside of the ELK stack. We were able to get everything we needed from Kibana.
Kibana should be sufficient in this architecture for decent analytics, if stronger metrics is needed then combine with Grafana. Datadog also offers nice overview but there's no need for it in this case unless you need more monitoring and alerting (and more technicalities).
@Kibana, of course, because @Grafana looks like amateur sort of solution, crammed with query builder grouping aggregates, but in essence, as recommended by CERN - KIbana is the corporate (startup vectored) decision.
Furthermore, @Kibana comes with complexity adhering ELK stack, whereas @InfluxDB + @Grafana & co. recently have become sophisticated development conglomerate instead of advancing towards a understandable installation step by step inheritance.
Pros of Amazon GuardDuty
- Easy setup2
Pros of Grafana
- Beautiful89
- Graphs are interactive68
- Free57
- Easy56
- Nicer than the Graphite web interface34
- Many integrations26
- Can build dashboards18
- Easy to specify time window10
- Can collaborate on dashboards10
- Dashboards contain number tiles9
- Open Source5
- Integration with InfluxDB5
- Click and drag to zoom in5
- Authentification and users management4
- Threshold limits in graphs4
- Alerts3
- It is open to cloud watch and many database3
- Simple and native support to Prometheus3
- Great community support2
- You can use this for development to check memcache2
- You can visualize real time data to put alerts2
- Grapsh as code0
- Plugin visualizationa0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon GuardDuty
Cons of Grafana
- No interactive query builder1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Amazon GuardDuty?
What is Grafana?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Amazon GuardDuty?
What companies use Grafana?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Amazon GuardDuty?
What tools integrate with Grafana?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+12
+23
+10+29
+42
+27