Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon MQ
Amazon MQ

10
14
+ 1
1
Starling
Starling

3
5
+ 1
0
Add tool

Amazon MQ vs Starling: What are the differences?

Developers describe Amazon MQ as "Managed Message Broker Service for ActiveMQ". Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. On the other hand, Starling is detailed as "A light weight server for reliable distributed message passing". Starling is a powerful but simple messaging server that enables reliable distributed queuing with an absolutely minimal overhead. It speaks the MemCache protocol for maximum cross-platform compatibility. Any language that speaks MemCache can take advantage of Starling's queue facilities.

Amazon MQ and Starling can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.

Starling is an open source tool with 468 GitHub stars and 63 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Starling's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud.

What is Starling?

Starling is a powerful but simple messaging server that enables reliable distributed queuing with an absolutely minimal overhead. It speaks the MemCache protocol for maximum cross-platform compatibility. Any language that speaks MemCache can take advantage of Starling's queue facilities.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon MQ?
Why do developers choose Starling?
    Be the first to leave a pro
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Amazon MQ?
      What companies use Starling?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Amazon MQ?
      What tools integrate with Starling?
        No integrations found
        What are some alternatives to Amazon MQ and Starling?
        Amazon SQS
        Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
        RabbitMQ
        RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
        IBM MQ
        It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information.
        Kafka
        Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
        ActiveMQ
        Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Amazon MQ and Starling
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Amazon MQ and Starling
        No reviews found
        How developers use Amazon MQ and Starling
        No items found
        How much does Amazon MQ cost?
        How much does Starling cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Amazon MQ
        More news