Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon QLDB vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?
Introduction
Amazon QLDB and InfluxDB are both database solutions, but they have key differences that differentiate them in terms of functionality and use cases.
1. Data Model: Amazon QLDB uses an immutable journal design, storing every data change as a revision and making it ideal for maintaining a complete and verifiable history of changes. In contrast, InfluxDB is a time-series database optimized for handling time-stamped data, making it efficient for data that changes frequently over time.
2. Query Language: Amazon QLDB uses PartiQL, a SQL-compatible query language that allows for flexible and powerful querying capabilities. On the other hand, InfluxDB uses InfluxQL, a query language specifically designed for time-series data with functions and features tailored for analyzing time-stamped data efficiently.
3. Consistency Model: Amazon QLDB offers strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that data is always accurate and up-to-date across all reads. InfluxDB, on the other hand, offers eventual consistency by default but allows users to configure different consistency levels based on their requirements.
4. Scalability: Amazon QLDB is a fully managed service provided by AWS, offering automatic scaling capabilities that handle growing workloads seamlessly. InfluxDB, although it can be self-hosted or managed in the cloud, requires manual configuration for scaling, making it more suitable for users who prefer more control over their database infrastructure.
5. Use Cases: Amazon QLDB is commonly used for applications that require an immutable and auditable transaction log, such as financial systems or legal applications. In contrast, InfluxDB is ideal for time-series data use cases, including monitoring, IoT, and real-time analytics, where fast data ingestion and querying of time-stamped data are key requirements.
6. Ecosystem Integration: Amazon QLDB is closely integrated with other AWS services, allowing seamless interaction with storage, analytics, and application services within the AWS ecosystem. InfluxDB has its own ecosystem and integrations, with a focus on time-series data processing and visualization tools for specific use cases.
In Summary, Amazon QLDB and InfluxDB differ in their data model, query language, consistency model, scalability, use cases, and ecosystem integration, catering to distinct requirements for data storage and analysis.
We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.
So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily
We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale, and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us a We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us better performance by far.
Druid is amazing for this use case and is a cloud-native solution that can be deployed on any cloud infrastructure or on Kubernetes. - Easy to scale horizontally - Column Oriented Database - SQL to query data - Streaming and Batch Ingestion - Native search indexes It has feature to work as TimeSeriesDB, Datawarehouse, and has Time-optimized partitioning.
if you want to find a serverless solution with capability of a lot of storage and SQL kind of capability then google bigquery is the best solution for that.
I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.
The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)
We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection
Pros of Amazon QLDB
Pros of InfluxDB
- Time-series data analysis58
- Easy setup, no dependencies30
- Fast, scalable & open source24
- Open source21
- Real-time analytics20
- Continuous Query support6
- Easy Query Language5
- HTTP API4
- Out-of-the-box, automatic Retention Policy4
- Offers Enterprise version1
- Free Open Source version1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon QLDB
Cons of InfluxDB
- Instability4
- Proprietary query language1
- HA or Clustering is only in paid version1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Amazon QLDB?
What is InfluxDB?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Amazon QLDB?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+27