Amazon RDS for Aurora vs InfluxDB

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon RDS for Aurora
Amazon RDS for Aurora

313
145
+ 1
47
InfluxDB
InfluxDB

461
301
+ 1
112
Add tool

Amazon RDS for Aurora vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?

What is Amazon RDS for Aurora? MySQL and PostgreSQL compatible relational database with several times better performance. Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.

What is InfluxDB? An open-source distributed time series database with no external dependencies. InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out..

Amazon RDS for Aurora belongs to "SQL Database as a Service" category of the tech stack, while InfluxDB can be primarily classified under "Databases".

Some of the features offered by Amazon RDS for Aurora are:

  • High Throughput with Low Jitter
  • Push-button Compute Scaling
  • Storage Auto-scaling

On the other hand, InfluxDB provides the following key features:

  • Time-Centric Functions
  • Scalable Metrics
  • Events

"MySQL compatibility " is the top reason why over 11 developers like Amazon RDS for Aurora, while over 36 developers mention "Time-series data analysis" as the leading cause for choosing InfluxDB.

InfluxDB is an open source tool with 16.7K GitHub stars and 2.38K GitHub forks. Here's a link to InfluxDB's open source repository on GitHub.

trivago, Redox Engine, and Thumbtack are some of the popular companies that use InfluxDB, whereas Amazon RDS for Aurora is used by Medium, StackShare, and Zumba. InfluxDB has a broader approval, being mentioned in 119 company stacks & 39 developers stacks; compared to Amazon RDS for Aurora, which is listed in 121 company stacks and 31 developer stacks.

No Stats
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon RDS for Aurora?

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.

What is InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon RDS for Aurora?
Why do developers choose InfluxDB?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What companies use Amazon RDS for Aurora?
What companies use InfluxDB?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Amazon RDS for Aurora?
What tools integrate with InfluxDB?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Amazon RDS for Aurora and InfluxDB?
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.
Google Cloud SQL
MySQL databases deployed in the cloud without a fuss. Google Cloud Platform provides you with powerful databases that run fast, don’t run out of space and give your application the redundant, reliable storage it needs.
ClearDB
ClearDB uses a combination of advanced replication techniques, advanced cluster technology, and layered web services to provide you with a MySQL database that is "smarter" than usual.
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
Build apps and store data in minutes with easy access to one or more databases and sleep better knowing your data is backed up and optimized.
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL provides a managed database service for app development and deployment that allows you to stand up a MySQL database in minutes and scale on the fly – on the cloud you trust most.
See all alternatives
Decisions about Amazon RDS for Aurora and InfluxDB
Tim Specht
Tim Specht
‎Co-Founder and CTO at Dubsmash · | 13 upvotes · 50.1K views
atDubsmashDubsmash
Amazon RDS for Aurora
Amazon RDS for Aurora
Redis
Redis
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Heroku
Heroku
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
#PlatformAsAService
#Databases
#NosqlDatabaseAsAService
#SqlDatabaseAsAService

Over the years we have added a wide variety of different storages to our stack including PostgreSQL (some hosted by Heroku, some by Amazon RDS) for storing relational data, Amazon DynamoDB to store non-relational data like recommendations & user connections, or Redis to hold pre-aggregated data to speed up API endpoints.

Since we started running Postgres ourselves on RDS instead of only using the managed offerings of Heroku, we've gained additional flexibility in scaling our application while reducing costs at the same time.

We are also heavily testing Amazon RDS for Aurora in its Postgres-compatible version and will also give the new release of Aurora Serverless a try!

#SqlDatabaseAsAService #NosqlDatabaseAsAService #Databases #PlatformAsAService

See more
Julien DeFrance
Julien DeFrance
Full Stack Engineering Manager at ValiMail · | 16 upvotes · 267.9K views
atSmartZipSmartZip
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Ruby
Ruby
Node.js
Node.js
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
New Relic
New Relic
Amazon Elasticsearch Service
Amazon Elasticsearch Service
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Superset
Superset
Amazon Quicksight
Amazon Quicksight
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Zapier
Zapier
Segment
Segment
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Memcached
Memcached
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon RDS for Aurora
Amazon RDS for Aurora
MySQL
MySQL
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Docker
Docker
Capistrano
Capistrano
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Rails API
Rails API
Rails
Rails
Algolia
Algolia

Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

Future improvements / technology decisions included:

Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

See more
Interest over time
Reviews of Amazon RDS for Aurora and InfluxDB
Review ofInfluxDBInfluxDB

Influx doesn't currently natively support horizontal distribution. Hard to recommend it until they implement that.

Avatar of YaronWittenstein
Computer Science
Review ofInfluxDBInfluxDB

InfluxDB is a game changer

How developers use Amazon RDS for Aurora and InfluxDB
Avatar of ShadowICT
ShadowICT uses InfluxDBInfluxDB

We use InfluxDB as a store for our data that gets fed into Grafana. It's ideal for this as it's a lightweight storage engine that can be modified on the fly by scripts without having to log into the server itself and manage tables. The HTTP API also makes it ideal for integrating with frontend services.

Avatar of Goyoboard
Goyoboard uses InfluxDBInfluxDB

To track time-series of course, utilizing few retention rules and continuous queries to keep time-series data fast and maintanable

Avatar of sapslaj
sapslaj uses InfluxDBInfluxDB

InfluxDB ingests information from various sources (mostly Telegraf instances) into one place for monitoring purposes.

Avatar of Secumail
Secumail uses Amazon RDS for AuroraAmazon RDS for Aurora

Managed MySQL clustered database so I dont have to deal with the required infrastructure

Avatar of RedLine13
RedLine13 uses Amazon RDS for AuroraAmazon RDS for Aurora

Core database for managing users, teams, tests, and result summaries

Avatar of Yaakov Gesher
Yaakov Gesher uses Amazon RDS for AuroraAmazon RDS for Aurora

We moved our database from compose.io to AWS for speed and price.

Avatar of Chris Hartwig
Chris Hartwig uses InfluxDBInfluxDB

All our metrics go through InfluxDB, both applicative and system

Avatar of Bùi Thanh
Bùi Thanh uses Amazon RDS for AuroraAmazon RDS for Aurora
  • Performance, HA and Scalable.
  • AutoScale replicas.
How much does Amazon RDS for Aurora cost?
How much does InfluxDB cost?
Pricing unavailable