Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL vs Crunchy Bridge

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

+ 1
Crunchy Bridge

+ 1
Add tool

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL vs Crunchy Bridge: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL and Crunchy Bridge

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL and Crunchy Bridge are both popular database management systems (DBMS) used for handling PostgreSQL databases. However, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Pricing Model: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL follows a traditional pricing model where you pay for the resources you provision, including compute, storage, and data transfer costs. On the other hand, Crunchy Bridge utilizes a simpler and more transparent pricing model based on the amount of data stored in your database.

  2. Ease of Setup: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL requires manual provisioning and configuration of the database instances, which can be time-consuming and require a certain level of expertise. In contrast, Crunchy Bridge offers a fully managed service where the setup and maintenance tasks are handled automatically, allowing for a more streamlined and hassle-free experience.

  3. Scalability: While both solutions offer scalability options, Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL provides more flexibility in terms of scaling your database instances up or down based on your specific workload demands. Additionally, Amazon RDS offers read replicas for improved performance and high availability. Crunchy Bridge, on the other hand, offers a simpler approach to scaling, focusing on vertical scaling rather than horizontal scaling.

  4. Flexibility and Customization: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL provides more options for customization and fine-tuning of your database configuration, allowing you to optimize performance based on your specific requirements. Crunchy Bridge, being a fully managed service, offers fewer options for customization but ensures simplified management and administration.

  5. Features and Add-ons: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL offers a wide range of features and add-ons, including automated backups, security controls, and monitoring capabilities. It also integrates well with other AWS services. Crunchy Bridge, while lacking some advanced features, focuses on providing a simplified and user-friendly experience, making it suitable for smaller projects or those with less complex requirements.

  6. Support and Documentation: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL benefits from the extensive support network and documentation provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). With Crunchy Bridge, you have access to their dedicated support team for assistance but do not have the same level of support resources as with AWS.

In summary, Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL and Crunchy Bridge differ in their pricing models, setup processes, scalability options, flexibility, features, and support offerings. Choosing between the two depends on your specific needs and preferences, with Amazon RDS catering to a wider range of requirements and Crunchy Bridge offering a simplified and user-friendly experience.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Pros of Crunchy Bridge
  • 25
    Easy setup, backup, monitoring
  • 13
    Geospatial support
  • 2
    Master-master replication using Multi-AZ instance
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    No Stats

    What is Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL?

    Amazon RDS manages complex and time-consuming administrative tasks such as PostgreSQL software installation and upgrades, storage management, replication for high availability and back-ups for disaster recovery. With just a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can deploy a PostgreSQL database with automatically configured database parameters for optimal performance. Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL database instances can be provisioned with either standard storage or Provisioned IOPS storage. Once provisioned, you can scale from 10GB to 3TB of storage and from 1,000 IOPS to 30,000 IOPS.

    What is Crunchy Bridge?

    It is a fully-managed database as a service. It takes care of backups, high availability, monitoring. Additionally, it is multi-cloud supporting AWS and Azure and comes with PL/Python3u and PL/R for more powerful work.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL?
    What companies use Crunchy Bridge?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL or Crunchy Bridge.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL?
    What tools integrate with Crunchy Bridge?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL and Crunchy Bridge?
    Heroku Postgres
    Heroku Postgres provides a SQL database-as-a-service that lets you focus on building your application instead of messing around with database management.
    Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL
    With Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL, you can spend less time on your database operations and more time on your applications.
    Azure Database for PostgreSQL
    Azure Database for PostgreSQL provides a managed database service for app development and deployment that allows you to stand up a PostgreSQL database in minutes and scale on the fly – on the cloud you trust most.
    ElephantSQL hosts PostgreSQL on Amazon EC2 in multiple regions and availability zones. The servers are continuously transferring the Write-Ahead-Log (the transaction log) to S3 for maximum reliability.
    Neon Database
    It is a fully managed serverless PostgreSQL. Neon separates storage and compute to offer modern developer features such as serverless, branching, bottomless storage, and more.
    See all alternatives