Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon S3

+ 1
GitHub Pages

+ 1
Add tool

Amazon S3 vs GitHub Pages: What are the differences?

Introduction: Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages are two popular web hosting services, but they differ in several key aspects. In this Markdown code, we will provide a concise overview of the key differences between Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages.

  1. Pricing Model: Amazon S3 offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on storage, data transfer, and requests made, which can be cost-effective for large-scale applications. On the other hand, GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites and repositories, making it an attractive option for personal projects or smaller websites with limited traffic.

  2. Platform Integration: Amazon S3 is a standalone cloud storage service, allowing developers to store and retrieve any kind of data. It can be integrated with other AWS services and provides advanced features like object versioning and lifecycle policies. In contrast, GitHub Pages is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, offering seamless deployment of static websites directly from the repository, providing a streamlined workflow for developers.

  3. Custom Domain Support: Both Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages support custom domain mapping, allowing websites to use a personalized domain name. However, Amazon S3 requires additional configuration steps to set up a custom domain, while GitHub Pages simplifies the process by automatically setting up SSL certificates for custom domains.

  4. Collaboration and Version Control: GitHub Pages has strong collaboration features built-in, as it is closely tied to the Git version control system. This enables team collaboration, pull requests, and automatic deployment of changes made to the repository. Amazon S3, being a cloud storage service, does not provide built-in collaboration features or version control functionalities.

  5. Advanced Functionality: Amazon S3 offers a wide range of advanced functionalities such as access control management, server-side encryption, event notifications, and content delivery through Amazon CloudFront. GitHub Pages, being focused on static website hosting, does not offer as many advanced features and is primarily geared towards simplicity and ease of use.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Amazon S3 is designed to handle large amounts of data and scalable workloads, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications. It provides various performance optimizations like multi-part uploads and transfer acceleration. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, may not be as robust in terms of scalability and performance, making it more suitable for smaller websites or personal projects with lower traffic volumes.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages differ in their pricing model, platform integration, support for custom domains, collaboration and version control features, advanced functionality, and scalability/performance capabilities.

Decisions about Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages
Howie Zhao
Full Stack Engineer at yintrust · | 7 upvotes · 218.5K views

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

See more
Gabriel Pa

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon S3
Pros of GitHub Pages
  • 590
  • 492
  • 456
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
  • 30
  • 13
    Easy Setup
  • 11
  • 11
    1000+ POPs
  • 6
  • 4
    Plug and play
  • 4
  • 3
    Web UI for uploading files
  • 2
    Faster on response
  • 2
  • 2
    GDPR ready
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
  • 1
    Easy integration with CloudFront
  • 290
  • 217
    Right out of github
  • 185
    Quick to set up
  • 108
  • 107
    Easy to learn
  • 58
    Great way of setting up your project's website
  • 47
    Widely used
  • 41
    Quick and easy
  • 37
    Great documentation
  • 4
    Super easy
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Instant and fast Jekyll builds
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Great integration

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon S3
Cons of GitHub Pages
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 3
    Complex to set up
  • 4
    Not possible to perform HTTP redirects
  • 3
    Supports only Jekyll
  • 3
    Limited Jekyll plugins
  • 1
    Jekyll is bloated

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Amazon S3?

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

What is GitHub Pages?

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Amazon S3?
What companies use GitHub Pages?
See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon S3 or GitHub Pages.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Amazon S3?
What tools integrate with GitHub Pages?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages?
Amazon Glacier
In order to keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable. With Amazon Glacier, customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions.
Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.
Amazon EC2
It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
Google Drive
Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.
Microsoft Azure
Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.
See all alternatives