Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon S3 vs GitHub Pages: What are the differences?
Introduction: Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages are two popular web hosting services, but they differ in several key aspects. In this Markdown code, we will provide a concise overview of the key differences between Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages.
Pricing Model: Amazon S3 offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on storage, data transfer, and requests made, which can be cost-effective for large-scale applications. On the other hand, GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites and repositories, making it an attractive option for personal projects or smaller websites with limited traffic.
Platform Integration: Amazon S3 is a standalone cloud storage service, allowing developers to store and retrieve any kind of data. It can be integrated with other AWS services and provides advanced features like object versioning and lifecycle policies. In contrast, GitHub Pages is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, offering seamless deployment of static websites directly from the repository, providing a streamlined workflow for developers.
Custom Domain Support: Both Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages support custom domain mapping, allowing websites to use a personalized domain name. However, Amazon S3 requires additional configuration steps to set up a custom domain, while GitHub Pages simplifies the process by automatically setting up SSL certificates for custom domains.
Collaboration and Version Control: GitHub Pages has strong collaboration features built-in, as it is closely tied to the Git version control system. This enables team collaboration, pull requests, and automatic deployment of changes made to the repository. Amazon S3, being a cloud storage service, does not provide built-in collaboration features or version control functionalities.
Advanced Functionality: Amazon S3 offers a wide range of advanced functionalities such as access control management, server-side encryption, event notifications, and content delivery through Amazon CloudFront. GitHub Pages, being focused on static website hosting, does not offer as many advanced features and is primarily geared towards simplicity and ease of use.
Scalability and Performance: Amazon S3 is designed to handle large amounts of data and scalable workloads, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications. It provides various performance optimizations like multi-part uploads and transfer acceleration. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, may not be as robust in terms of scalability and performance, making it more suitable for smaller websites or personal projects with lower traffic volumes.
In Summary, Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages differ in their pricing model, platform integration, support for custom domains, collaboration and version control features, advanced functionality, and scalability/performance capabilities.
We use Netlify to host static websites.
The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:
- Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
- With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public
In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Amazon S3
- Reliable590
- Scalable492
- Cheap456
- Simple & easy329
- Many sdks83
- Logical30
- Easy Setup13
- REST API11
- 1000+ POPs11
- Secure6
- Easy4
- Plug and play4
- Web UI for uploading files3
- Faster on response2
- Flexible2
- GDPR ready2
- Easy to use1
- Plug-gable1
- Easy integration with CloudFront1
Pros of GitHub Pages
- Free290
- Right out of github217
- Quick to set up185
- Instant108
- Easy to learn107
- Great way of setting up your project's website58
- Widely used47
- Quick and easy41
- Great documentation37
- Super easy4
- Easy setup3
- Instant and fast Jekyll builds2
- Great customer support2
- Great integration2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon S3
- Permissions take some time to get right7
- Requires a credit card6
- Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly6
- Complex to set up3
Cons of GitHub Pages
- Not possible to perform HTTP redirects4
- Supports only Jekyll3
- Limited Jekyll plugins3
- Jekyll is bloated1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Amazon S3?
What is GitHub Pages?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Amazon S3?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+5
+5
+7
+6
+4
+4
+17