Chaplin vs Ampersand.js | What are the differences?

Overview

Chaplin

Stacks6

Followers13

Votes5

GitHub Stars2.8K

Forks227

Ampersand.js

Stacks16

Followers22

Votes31

GitHub Stars811

Forks41

Ampersand.js vs Chaplin: What are the differences?

Developers describe Ampersand.js as "A highly modular, loosely coupled, non-frameworky framework for building advanced JavaScript apps". We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules. On the other hand, Chaplin is detailed as "HTML5 application architecture using Backbone.js". Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.

Ampersand.js and Chaplin belong to "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

Ampersand.js and Chaplin are both open source tools. It seems that Chaplin with 2.92K GitHub stars and 247 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Ampersand.js with 818 GitHub stars and 52 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

SmartClient Framework by Isomorphic Software Frameworks

SmartClient Framework by Isomorphic Software

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Detailed Comparison

Chaplin	Ampersand.js
Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.	We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.8K	GitHub Stars 811
GitHub Forks 227	GitHub Forks 41
Stacks 6	Stacks 16
Followers 13	Followers 22
Votes 5	Votes 31
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Scalable 2 Application architecture 1 Quickly develop	Pros 5 Open source 4 Micromodules 3 npm 3 CommonJS 3 Loosely Coupled
Integrations
Backbone.js	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Chaplin, Ampersand.js?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.