StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Angular 2 vs KnockoutJS

Angular 2 vs KnockoutJS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Knockout
Knockout
Stacks369
Followers202
Votes6
GitHub Stars10.5K
Forks1.5K
Angular
Angular
Stacks3.8K
Followers4.8K
Votes499
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K

Angular 2 vs KnockoutJS: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction: Angular 2 and KnockoutJS are two popular JavaScript frameworks used for developing web applications.>

  1. Component-Based Architecture: Angular 2 uses a component-based architecture where an application is divided into reusable and independent components, making it easier to manage and scale the application. On the other hand, KnockoutJS follows a MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) design pattern, which separates the UI from the underlying data and logic but does not enforce a strict component-based structure.

  2. Two-Way Data Binding: Angular 2 provides two-way data binding by default, allowing changes in the model to reflect automatically in the view and vice versa. In contrast, KnockoutJS offers automatic UI updates when the data model changes, but users need to manually handle input changes for two-way binding.

  3. TypeScript Support: Angular 2 is written in TypeScript, which is a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing and other advanced features. TypeScript enhances code maintainability, scalability, and developer productivity. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, primarily uses plain JavaScript with optional TypeScript support.

  4. Routing: Angular 2 has an integrated routing system that provides more advanced routing capabilities out of the box, making it easier to manage multiple views and navigation within a single-page application. KnockoutJS, in comparison, lacks built-in routing and requires additional libraries or manual implementation to achieve similar routing functionalities.

  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: Angular 2 has a more extensive tooling ecosystem with powerful CLI (Command Line Interface) tools, IDE support, and a large community contributing to libraries and resources. KnockoutJS, while having a supportive community, may not offer the same breadth of tools and resources as Angular 2.

  6. Performance: Angular 2 is built with performance optimization in mind, leveraging features like ahead-of-time compilation and tree shaking to reduce bundle sizes and improve application efficiency. KnockoutJS, although efficient for smaller applications, may face performance challenges when handling complex or data-intensive scenarios due to its architecture.

In Summary, Angular 2 emphasizes a component-based architecture, provides robust two-way data binding, TypeScript support, integrated routing, a rich tooling ecosystem, and optimized performance compared to KnockoutJS.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Knockout, Angular

Alexander
Alexander

Dec 22, 2020

Review

The tools you mentioned are all backend focused frameworks. I will say, you can choose one of them as you may prefer (maybe Laravel and Django will be better since it's more organized than Node.js). But no matter what, if you will create a website builder application, today you'll need a frontend framework like Vue.js, React or Angular - or maybe Ember.js, Svelte and Meteor.

382k views382k
Comments
Dennis
Dennis

CTO at Prepaid-Hoster

May 17, 2020

Decided

I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.

181k views181k
Comments
Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Fortinet

Oct 16, 2019

Decided

When deciding on a front end framework to build my bitcoin faucet project, I knew I needed something battle hardened, dependedable, but also feature filled and ready to go out of the box.

While I've written some smaller apps with ng2+, I've never gone full tilt with it so I knew there were still some things to learn, and most importantly: how to do them properly, such as proper component architecture and breaking old habbits from ng1.

I didn't opt for React in this case, simply due to the need to stack more and more things on top of it to do what I'd need it to do. I wanted a framework that was going to take over routing and execution of complex UI controls, and keep items outside of a component's scope updated and react to events. This framework needed a comprehensive event emission system, data acquisition and handling, bi-directional data binding, state, and a series of things that you'd need to install separately for React to match up to what's already in the box with Angular.

I opted to stick to Angular instead of Vue for the fact that Angular also already has it's entire build system ready to go and comprehensivly built to deliver the tiniest version of it's deliverable. I was hosting this thing in a google cloud instance, so I needed to make sure the app stayed as small as possible, and could automatically trim out the cruft. This is where Angular's built in Tree Shaking took precedence for me.

Vue is more than capable of handling everything I'd need, and it was something I took serious considerion of. For instance, Vue poweres Cointiply, another bitcoin faucet application that's highly reactive and high componentized just like I wanted.

But I'd still need to learn Vue, I'd still need to configure it's build system, and I still wanted to use SCSS and TypeScript.

So Angular it was. ng8 is a great platform for building very complex user interfaces, and has many of the problems you'd inevitably face integrating a user interface to an application already figured out, and complete with a best practice recommendation.

React and Vue, given enough time and energy, are super capable platforms. No one can deny that. Angular's "A-Z Batteries Included" approach to the whole development process is what made it especially enticing this time.

55.4k views55.4k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Knockout
Knockout
Angular
Angular

It is a JavaScript library that helps you to create rich, responsive display and editor user interfaces with a clean underlying data model. Any time you have sections of UI that update dynamically (e.g., changing depending on the user’s actions or when an external data source changes), it can help you implement it more simply and maintainably.

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Easily associate DOM elements with model data using a concise, readable syntax; When your data model's state changes, your UI updates automatically; Implicitly set up chains of relationships between model data, to transform and combine it; Quickly generate sophisticated, nested UIs as a function of your model data
Progressive Web Apps; Native; Code Generation; Code Splitting
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.5K
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
26.7K
Stacks
369
Stacks
3.8K
Followers
202
Followers
4.8K
Votes
6
Votes
499
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Data centered application
  • 2
    Great for validations
  • 1
    Open source
Pros
  • 109
    It's a powerful framework
  • 53
    Straight-forward architecture
  • 48
    TypeScript
  • 45
    Great UI and Business Logic separation
  • 40
    Powerful, maintainable, fast
Cons
  • 9
    Large overhead in file size and initialization time
  • 9
    Overcomplicated
  • 2
    CLI not open to other test and linting tools
  • 2
    Ugly code
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Firebase
Firebase
Sentry
Sentry
Socket.IO
Socket.IO

What are some alternatives to Knockout, Angular?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase