StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. CSS Pre Processors Extensions
  5. Animate.css vs Compass

Animate.css vs Compass

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Compass
Compass
Stacks352
Followers297
Votes12
GitHub Stars6.7K
Forks1.2K
Animate.css
Animate.css
Stacks11.4K
Followers3.1K
Votes0

Animate.css vs Compass: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Animation Capabilities: Animate.css is a library specifically designed for creating CSS animations, providing a wide range of pre-built animations that can easily be added to your website. Compass, on the other hand, is a CSS authoring framework that includes mixins and functions for generating CSS code, but does not focus primarily on animations.

  2. Pre-built vs Customization: Animate.css offers pre-built animations that can be easily added to elements by simply applying a CSS class, making it quick and straightforward to implement animations. Compass, on the other hand, allows for more customization and control over the CSS output through the use of mixins and functions, giving developers more flexibility in designing styles.

  3. Browser Compatibility: Animate.css is compatible with a wide range of browsers, ensuring that animations look consistent across different platforms. Compass, being a CSS authoring framework, does not impact browser compatibility directly but can be used to generate CSS code that is cross-browser compatible by using vendor prefixes and other techniques.

  4. Learning Curve: Animate.css is beginner-friendly with its simple implementation, making it accessible for developers who are new to CSS animations. Compass, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve due to its more advanced features and the need to understand mixins and functions to utilize it effectively.

  5. Community Support and Updates: Animate.css is a popular library with a large community of users, which results in frequent updates, bug fixes, and new animations being added regularly. Compass, while also having a supportive community, may not receive updates as frequently since it is more focused on providing tools for CSS authoring rather than animations specifically.

  6. File Size and Efficiency: Animate.css may lead to larger file sizes if multiple animations are used on a website, potentially affecting loading times and performance. Compass, by allowing developers to generate precise and optimized CSS code through mixins and functions, can help in reducing file size and improving overall efficiency of the codebase.

In Summary, Animate.css is a library focused on providing pre-built animations with easy implementation, while Compass is a CSS authoring framework that offers customization and control over generated CSS code. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Compass
Compass
Animate.css
Animate.css

The compass core framework is a design-agnostic framework that provides common code that would otherwise be duplicated across other frameworks and extensions.

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

-
Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
352
Stacks
11.4K
Followers
297
Followers
3.1K
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    No vendor prefix CSS pain
  • 1
    Variables
  • 1
    Mixins
  • 1
    Compass sprites
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sass
Sass
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Compass, Animate.css ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase