StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Velocity.js vs anime.js

Velocity.js vs anime.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Velocity.js
Velocity.js
Stacks6
Followers26
Votes0
GitHub Stars17.3K
Forks1.5K
anime.js
anime.js
Stacks44
Followers67
Votes0
GitHub Stars65.1K
Forks4.4K

Velocity.js vs anime.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Velocity.js and anime.js are both popular javascript animation libraries used for creating dynamic web animations. They have their own unique features and capabilities that set them apart from each other.

  1. API Design: Velocity.js offers a jQuery-like syntax for animations, making it easy for developers familiar with jQuery to transition to. On the other hand, anime.js provides a more modern, flexible, and lightweight API which allows for more control and customization in animations.

  2. Performance: Velocity.js is known for its high performance and efficiency in handling animations, especially when dealing with multiple elements. In contrast, anime.js is lightweight and optimized for optimal performance, making it ideal for smooth animations on both desktop and mobile devices.

  3. Ecosystem: Velocity.js has a larger user base and a more extensive set of plugins and extensions available, making it more versatile for different animation needs. anime.js, while not as widely adopted, has a growing community and a focus on simplicity and ease of use.

  4. Features: Velocity.js offers a robust set of features for animations, including easing functions, timeline controls, and UI pack for UI animations. In comparison, anime.js focuses on core animation functionality, providing a simple and straightforward approach to creating animations without unnecessary bloat.

  5. Browser Support: Velocity.js has broader compatibility with older browsers such as Internet Explorer 8, while anime.js is designed for modern browsers with support for CSS variables, HSL colors, and more advanced features.

  6. Documentation: Velocity.js has comprehensive documentation with detailed examples and guides, making it easier for beginners to get started with animations. anime.js, although well-documented, might require a bit more digging to find specific information due to its minimalist approach.

In Summary, Velocity.js and anime.js differ in API design, performance, ecosystem, features, browser support, and documentation, catering to different needs in the world of web animations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Velocity.js
Velocity.js
anime.js
anime.js

It is an animation engine with the same API as jQuery's $.animate(). It works with and without jQuery. It is the best of jQuery and CSS transitions combined.

It is a lightweight JavaScript animation library with a simple, yet powerful API. It works with CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes and JavaScript Objects.

Color animation; Transforms; Loops; Easings; SVG support; Scrolling.
Layered CSS transforms; Controls and callbacks;Animate anything
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.3K
GitHub Stars
65.1K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
4.4K
Stacks
6
Stacks
44
Followers
26
Followers
67
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Dojo
Dojo
layerJS
layerJS
ZingGrid
ZingGrid
fancybox
fancybox
DNN
DNN
Stencil
Stencil
Blazejs
Blazejs
Pilot
Pilot
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
UDash
UDash
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
JavaScript
JavaScript
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Velocity.js, anime.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase