Appium vs Jasmine

Overview

Jasmine

Stacks4.8K

Followers1.5K

Votes187

Appium

Stacks650

Followers574

Votes28

GitHub Stars20.8K

Forks6.2K

Appium vs Jasmine: What are the differences?

1. Automation Tools: Appium is a mobile automation testing tool that supports both Android and iOS platforms, while Jasmine is a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework for testing JavaScript code. 2. Language Support: Appium supports various programming languages like Java, Python, Ruby, etc., whereas Jasmine is primarily used with JavaScript. 3. Testing Level: Appium is more focused on end-to-end testing of mobile applications, whereas Jasmine is used for unit testing of JavaScript code. 4. Integration Capabilities: Appium can integrate with various popular testing frameworks like Selenium, Robot Framework, etc., while Jasmine is standalone for testing JavaScript code. 5. Test Case Structure: Appium allows writing test cases in a linear manner, while Jasmine promotes the use of behavior-driven development style with descriptive and readable test cases. 6. Target Audience: Appium is more suitable for mobile app developers and testers, whereas Jasmine is targeted at JavaScript developers for writing efficient and reliable unit tests.

In summary, the key differences between Appium and Jasmine lie in their target platforms, language support, testing levels, integration capabilities, test case structures, and target audiences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jasmine, Appium

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.

231k views231k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jasmine	Appium
Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.	Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.
-	Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 20.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.2K
Stacks 4.8K	Stacks 650
Followers 1.5K	Followers 574
Votes 187	Votes 28
Pros & Cons
Pros 64 Can also be used for tdd 49 Open source 19 Originally from RSpec 15 Great community 14 No dependencies, not even DOM Cons 2 Unfriendly error logs	Pros 12 Webdriverio support 6 Java, C#, Python support 3 Open source 2 Great GUI with inspector 2 Active community
Integrations
No integrations available	Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Jasmine, Appium?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Related Comparisons

Appium vs Jasmine: What are the differences?

In summary, the key differences between Appium and Jasmine lie in their target platforms, language support, testing levels, integration capabilities, test case structures, and target audiences.

Appium vs Jasmine

Overview