StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Voice & Audio Models
  4. Speech Recognition As A Service
  5. AssemblyAI vs Google Cloud Speech API

AssemblyAI vs Google Cloud Speech API

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Speech API
Google Cloud Speech API
Stacks39
Followers74
Votes1
AssemblyAI
AssemblyAI
Stacks19
Followers40
Votes0

AssemblyAI vs Google Cloud Speech API: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will compare the key differences between AssemblyAI and Google Cloud Speech API. Both platforms provide services for speech-to-text transcription, but they have distinct features and capabilities that set them apart.

  1. Accuracy: AssemblyAI offers highly accurate transcription services by using advanced machine learning algorithms and continuous training on large datasets. They claim to achieve a word error rate (WER) of less than 10%. On the other hand, Google Cloud Speech API also provides high accuracy, but it might slightly vary depending on the audio quality and language complexity.

  2. Ease of Use: AssemblyAI focuses on simplicity, providing a user-friendly and easy-to-integrate API. It offers straightforward documentation and SDKs in multiple programming languages, allowing developers to quickly implement speech-to-text functionality. In comparison, the Google Cloud Speech API is also relatively easy to use, but it offers a broader range of features, which might require additional configuration and customization.

  3. Pricing Model: AssemblyAI adopts a simple and transparent pricing model based on usage, charging per minute of transcribed audio. They provide different plans with discounts for larger volumes of transcription. In contrast, Google Cloud Speech API offers pricing based on usage with different rates for speech recognition and audio data storage. It also provides various pricing tiers based on monthly usage volume.

  4. Language Support: AssemblyAI supports transcription in multiple languages, including English, Spanish, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, and more. They continue to expand their language support based on customer demand. In contrast, Google Cloud Speech API offers extensive language support, covering a wide range of languages, dialects, and accents from around the world. It provides models trained on specific languages for more accurate recognition.

  5. Real-time Transcription: AssemblyAI provides real-time transcription features, allowing the API to generate transcriptions as the audio is being processed. This is particularly useful for applications where real-time feedback is required. On the other hand, Google Cloud Speech API also offers real-time transcription capabilities, enabling developers to transcribe audio in near real-time, making it suitable for live streaming and real-time communication applications.

  6. Customization Options: AssemblyAI provides some customization options, allowing users to specify custom vocabularies and boost certain words or phrases for improved recognition accuracy. While these options are limited, they can be beneficial for specific use cases. In contrast, Google Cloud Speech API provides more advanced customization options. It allows users to create and train custom speech recognition models, which can be highly advantageous for domain-specific vocabulary and specialized applications.

In summary, AssemblyAI and Google Cloud Speech API both offer highly accurate speech-to-text transcription services, but they differ in terms of ease of use, pricing model, language support, real-time transcription capabilities, and customization options. AssemblyAI focuses on simplicity and transparency, while Google Cloud Speech API provides more extensive features and customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Speech API
Google Cloud Speech API
AssemblyAI
AssemblyAI

Google Cloud Speech API enables developers to convert audio to text by applying powerful neural network models in an easy to use API. The API recognizes over 80 languages and variants, to support your global user base.

Transcribe phone calls or build voice powered apps. Recognize unlimited industry specific words and phrases without any training required. All at simple, affordable pricing.

Over 80 Languages;Return Text Results In Real-Time;Accurate In Noisy Environments;Powered by Machine Learning
-
Statistics
Stacks
39
Stacks
19
Followers
74
Followers
40
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    More accurate than AbbyyOCR for images from smartphone
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Speech API, AssemblyAI?

TalkAny: Free AI Speaking Practice

TalkAny: Free AI Speaking Practice

TalkAny—Free AI Speaking Practice Platform. Practice English/Chinese speaking with AI 24/7; no partner needed. Get real-time grammar correction, pronunciation feedback, and natural expression tips. Perfect for IELTS, TOEFL, DET exam prep, daily conversation, and job interviews. Zero pressure, unlimited practice. Start speaking now!

Soniox

Soniox

Transcribe and translate speech in over 60 languages, in real-time, with high accuracy.

Deepgram

Deepgram

Deepgram helps you harness the potential of your voice data with intelligent speech models built to scale and continuously improve over time. The API is the gateway to Deepgram's Brain AI models, and gives you customizable access to fast, high accuracy transcription and phonetic search. Deepgram Brain can understand nearly every audio format available.

SpeechText.AI

SpeechText.AI

It is the first multilingual and industry-specific transcription service that can transcribe audio/video with close to human accuracy. It can accurately transcribe conference calls, interviews, podcasts, lectures, and meeting records in more than 30 different languages and dialects. It is now almost as accurate as human transcriptionists.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope