StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Auth0 vs Authy

Auth0 vs Authy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Authy
Authy
Stacks162
Followers174
Votes1
Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215

Auth0 vs Authy: What are the differences?

Introduction

Auth0 and Authy are two popular authentication and authorization platforms that provide security and identity management solutions. While both offer similar functionalities, there are several key differences between Auth0 and Authy.

  1. Integration and Customization: Auth0 provides more flexibility in terms of integration and customization. It offers a wide range of SDKs and libraries, making it easier to integrate with various platforms and technologies. Auth0 also allows for extensive customization of workflows, user interface, and branding. On the other hand, Authy focuses more on simplicity and ease of use, providing a more out-of-the-box solution with less customization options.

  2. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Authy is primarily focused on providing MFA solutions, offering token-based authentication through SMS, voice, and push notifications. It offers a simple and user-friendly MFA experience with features like device recognition and backup options. Auth0, on the other hand, provides MFA as one of its many features but has a broader scope in terms of authentication and authorization capabilities.

  3. Enterprise Scale and Support: Auth0 is well-suited for enterprise-scale deployments and offers extensive support and documentation for complex use cases. It provides features like anomaly detection, risk-based authentication, and fine-grained access control policies that cater to the needs of large organizations. Authy, while capable of handling small to medium scale deployments, may not offer as advanced enterprise features or comprehensive support.

  4. User Management and Administration: Auth0 provides a comprehensive user management system that allows for easy user onboarding, user profile management, password reset, and user permissions. It also supports social login and identity federation. Authy, on the other hand, focuses more on the authentication aspect and may not offer the same level of user management and administration functionalities as Auth0.

  5. Authentication Protocols and Standards: Auth0 supports a wide range of authentication protocols and standards including OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, SAML, and more. It allows for seamless integration with third-party applications and services. Authy, while also supporting some authentication protocols, may have a more limited range of options.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Auth0 offers a flexible pricing structure with various plans based on usage and requirements. It provides a free tier and options for custom enterprise plans. Authy, on the other hand, offers a paid service and may not have as many pricing options or flexibility.

In summary, Auth0 provides more integration options, customization capabilities, and advanced enterprise features, while Authy focuses on providing a simple and user-friendly MFA solution. The choice between Auth0 and Authy depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the organization or project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Authy, Auth0

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Authy
Authy
Auth0
Auth0

We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Very secure- We take security seriously. We use industry standard secure algorithms (HMAC RFC 4426) and 256 bits keys which are always encrypted at rest.;Fully redundant- The Authy API is deployed accross different PCI level 1 data-centers and it's fully redundant. We also use a DNS provider with anycast support. We've had 100% availability since 2011.;Great user experience- You connect to Authy using a transparent REST API which allows you to customize the experience you want for your users.;Fully mobile- We support any cellphone. We provide apps for all major phones (iPhone and Android) as well as text-messages for other cellphones.;No expensive & complex setups- Hardware dongles, servers, software licenses, setup costs...It's 2013, forget all that. Authy is bringing two-factor authentication to the present.
User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Statistics
Stacks
162
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
174
Followers
2.1K
Votes
1
Votes
215
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Google Authenticator-compatible
Cons
  • 2
    Terrible UI on mobile
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
Integrations
WordPress
WordPress
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring

What are some alternatives to Authy, Auth0?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope