StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Auth0 vs Devise vs OmniAuth

Auth0 vs Devise vs OmniAuth

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
OmniAuth
OmniAuth
Stacks312
Followers150
Votes9

Auth0 vs Devise vs OmniAuth: What are the differences?

Introduction

Auth0, Devise, and OmniAuth are all popular authentication and authorization solutions used in web development. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that can influence the choice of developers. In this article, we will explore these differences and highlight the unique features of each solution.

  1. Integration Process: Auth0 provides a powerful and comprehensive authentication platform that can be integrated into a website or application with ease. It offers support for various protocols and frameworks, making it compatible with different technology stacks. On the other hand, Devise and OmniAuth are Ruby gems that focus on providing authentication functionalities specifically for Ruby on Rails applications. They require a more manual configuration process and may have limited compatibility with other frameworks.

  2. Ease of Use: Auth0 simplifies the authentication process by offering pre-built UI components and customizable login flows. It provides an intuitive dashboard for managing users, roles, and permissions, making it easy to set up and manage user authentication. Devise and OmniAuth, being gems specifically designed for Ruby on Rails, require more manual configuration and customizations for implementing authentication features. While they offer flexibility, they may require more development effort compared to Auth0.

  3. Authentication Options: Auth0 supports a wide range of authentication methods, including social logins (such as Google and Facebook), multi-factor authentication, and biometric authentication. It also provides support for authentication protocols like OAuth2 and OpenID Connect. Devise, on the other hand, primarily focuses on username/password authentication and does not provide built-in support for social logins or other advanced authentication methods. OmniAuth acts as a bridge between different authentication providers and allows for integrating multiple authentication options, but it does not provide the same level of out-of-the-box functionality as Auth0.

  4. Security Features: Auth0 emphasizes security and provides built-in features like password hashing, encryption, and secure token handling. It also offers anomaly detection and threat intelligence to protect against common security threats. Devise and OmniAuth, being Ruby gems, rely on the security practices implemented within the Ruby on Rails framework. While Ruby on Rails provides strong security measures, developers need to ensure proper implementation and customization for specific security requirements.

  5. Scalability and Maintenance: Auth0 is a cloud-based service that is designed to handle authentication and authorization for applications at scale. It provides reliability, scalability, and high availability out of the box. Devise and OmniAuth, being gems installed within the application's codebase, require developers to manage and maintain the authentication functionality themselves. This includes handling scalability, updates, and security patches as the application evolves.

  6. Community and Support: Auth0 has a large and active user community and provides comprehensive documentation, SDKs, and libraries for various platforms and languages. It also offers professional support and a service-level agreement for enterprise customers. Devise and OmniAuth, being open-source projects, have a community of contributors and developers, but the support may be more limited compared to a commercial service like Auth0. Community support and available resources can influence the development process and overall reliability of the selected authentication solution.

In summary, Auth0 offers a comprehensive and scalable authentication platform with broad compatibility and advanced features, while Devise and OmniAuth are Ruby-specific solutions that provide flexibility and customization options for Ruby on Rails applications. The choice between these solutions depends on specific project requirements, development expertise, and the need for out-of-the-box functionality versus customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Auth0, Devise, OmniAuth

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Ryan
Ryan

Aug 30, 2021

Needs adviceonFirebase AuthenticationFirebase AuthenticationAuth0Auth0OktaOkta

Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

1.16M views1.16M
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
Devise
Devise
OmniAuth
OmniAuth

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
Multi-provider authentication;Over 200 supported authentication providers (see list at https://github.com/intridea/omniauth/wiki/List-of-Strategies);Open source
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
535
Stacks
312
Followers
2.1K
Followers
232
Followers
150
Votes
215
Votes
56
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
Pros
  • 6
    Easy Social Login
  • 3
    Free
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
Rails
Rails
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Auth0, Devise, OmniAuth?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.

Azure Active Directory

Azure Active Directory

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope