AWS CloudFormation vs Habitat vs Terraform

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CloudFormation

1.5K
1.3K
+ 1
88
Habitat

33
59
+ 1
5
Terraform

17.9K
14.1K
+ 1
345

AWS CloudFormation vs Habitat vs Terraform: What are the differences?

1. Deployment Model: AWS CloudFormation is specific to the AWS cloud platform, while Habitat and Terraform are more platform agnostic, allowing deployment across multiple cloud providers and on-premises environments.

2. Configuration Management: Habitat focuses on application-level configuration management, providing native support for packaging, running, and updating applications. Terraform, on the other hand, primarily focuses on infrastructure configuration and provisioning, allowing users to define infrastructure as code.

3. Workflow Automation: AWS CloudFormation provides a template-based approach for automating infrastructure deployment, whereas Terraform offers a more modular and customizable workflow for managing infrastructure resources. Habitat, with its focus on packaging applications, streamlines the deployment and management of containerized applications.

4. Extensibility: Terraform has a vibrant community and ecosystem with numerous third-party providers and modules, making it highly extensible and adaptable to various use cases. Habitat, on the other hand, provides built-in capabilities for application automation and lifecycle management but may have limited integration options with external tools compared to Terraform.

5. Lifecycle Management: Habitat provides built-in features for managing the lifecycle of applications, including updates, scaling, and rollback capabilities, while Terraform primarily focuses on provisioning and configuring infrastructure resources. AWS CloudFormation offers a declarative approach to managing AWS resources but may require additional tools or processes for handling application lifecycle management.

6. Complexity: Terraform's infrastructure as code approach can lead to complex configurations and dependencies, especially in large-scale environments, whereas Habitat with its focus on application packaging and automation simplifies the deployment and management of applications. AWS CloudFormation falls in between, offering a balance between infrastructure and application management complexity.

In Summary, AWS CloudFormation is tightly integrated with AWS services, Habitat excels in application lifecycle management, and Terraform provides a flexible infrastructure as code solution with extensive community support.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS CloudFormation
Pros of Habitat
Pros of Terraform
  • 43
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 21
    Declarative infrastructure and deployment
  • 13
    No more clicking around
  • 3
    Any Operative System you want
  • 3
    Atomic
  • 3
    Infrastructure as code
  • 1
    CDK makes it truly infrastructure-as-code
  • 1
    Automates Infrastructure Deployment
  • 0
    K8s
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Supervisor is great concept
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Cross platform builds
  • 122
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
  • 8
    Well-documented
  • 8
    Cloud agnostic
  • 6
    It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English
  • 6
    Immutable infrastructure
  • 5
    Platform agnostic
  • 4
    Extendable
  • 4
    Automation
  • 4
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 4
    Portability
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Scales to hundreds of hosts

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CloudFormation
Cons of Habitat
Cons of Terraform
  • 4
    Brittle
  • 2
    No RBAC and policies in templates
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Doesn't have full support to GKE

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is AWS CloudFormation?

    You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

    What is Habitat?

    Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.

    What is Terraform?

    With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use AWS CloudFormation?
    What companies use Habitat?
    What companies use Terraform?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS CloudFormation?
    What tools integrate with Habitat?
    What tools integrate with Terraform?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+29
    14
    13422
    GitHubPythonReact+42
    49
    40727
    GitHubPythonNode.js+47
    54
    72315
    GitHubGitPython+22
    17
    14209
    GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
    12
    6566
    What are some alternatives to AWS CloudFormation, Habitat, and Terraform?
    AWS CodeDeploy
    AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.
    Chef
    Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
    AWS Config
    AWS Config is a fully managed service that provides you with an AWS resource inventory, configuration history, and configuration change notifications to enable security and governance. With AWS Config you can discover existing AWS resources, export a complete inventory of your AWS resources with all configuration details, and determine how a resource was configured at any point in time. These capabilities enable compliance auditing, security analysis, resource change tracking, and troubleshooting.
    Azure Resource Manager
    It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment.
    See all alternatives