Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Conan vs AWS CodeArtifact: What are the differences?
Conan: C/C++ package manager. Install or build your own packages for any platform. Conan also allows you to run your own server easily from the command line; AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service. It is a fully managed software artifact repository service that makes it easy for organizations of any size to securely store, publish, and share packages used in their software development process. It eliminates the need for you to set up, operate, and scale the infrastructure required for artifact management so you can focus on software development.
Conan and AWS CodeArtifact can be categorized as "Hosted Package Repository" tools.
Some of the features offered by Conan are:
- Dependencies and package management for developers
- De-centralized
- Source code and binaries
On the other hand, AWS CodeArtifact provides the following key features:
- Fully managed
- Securely store, publish, and share packages
- Eliminates the need for you to set up, operate, and scale the infrastructure required
Conan is an open source tool with 4.02K GitHub stars and 524 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Conan's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of AWS CodeArtifact
Pros of Conan
- Crossplatform builds3
- Easy to maintain used dependencies3
- Build recipes can be very flexble2
- Integrations with cmake, qmake and other build systems1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodeArtifact
Cons of Conan
- 3rd party recipes can be flawed1