Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodeBuild vs Bamboo: What are the differences?
Comparing AWS CodeBuild and Bamboo
AWS CodeBuild and Bamboo are both popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.
Pricing Model: The pricing model of AWS CodeBuild is based on the time taken to complete the build, whereas Bamboo follows a tier-based pricing model based on the number of build agents. This difference allows organizations to choose a pricing model that best aligns with their specific needs and usage patterns.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild is tightly integrated with other AWS services such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CloudFormation. This integration allows for seamless automated deployments using AWS resources. On the other hand, Bamboo provides integration with various non-AWS tools and systems, providing flexibility for organizations with a diverse toolset.
Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to scale automatically based on the workload requirements. It can handle build jobs in parallel and can easily accommodate increased demand. In contrast, Bamboo requires manual configuration for scaling out, which may involve additional overhead and maintenance efforts.
Deployment Options: AWS CodeBuild is a cloud-native service provided by Amazon Web Services, which means it is hosted and managed by AWS. This eliminates the need for organizations to set up and maintain their own infrastructure. Bamboo, on the other hand, can be deployed on both cloud-based and on-premises infrastructure, providing flexibility for organizations with specific deployment requirements.
Extensibility: AWS CodeBuild offers a wide range of predefined build environments and also allows users to create custom build environments using Docker images. Bamboo offers less flexibility in terms of build environments, but it provides a rich set of extensions and plugins that can be used to enhance its functionality and integrate with third-party tools.
Support and Documentation: As an AWS service, CodeBuild benefits from the extensive support and documentation provided by AWS. They have a large user community, comprehensive documentation, and dedicated support channels. Bamboo, on the other hand, provides support through Atlassian's standard support channels and has its own documentation resources.
In summary, AWS CodeBuild and Bamboo differ in their pricing models, integration with other tools and systems, scalability, deployment options, extensibility, and support/documentation. Organizations should consider these differences when choosing a continuous integration and delivery tool that best fits their specific requirements.
Pros of AWS CodeBuild
- Pay per minute7
- Parameter Store integration for passing secrets5
- Integrated with AWS4
- Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch3
- Bit bucket integration3
- GitHub Webhooks support2
- AWS Config and Config rule integration for compliance2
- VPC PrivateLinks to invoke service without internet2
- Windows/.NET support1
- Jenkins plugin integration1
- Ondemand scaling of build jobs1
- Scheduled builds with CloudWatch Events integration1
- Local build debug support1
- Native support for accessing Amazon VPC resources1
- Docker based build environment1
- Support for bringing custom Docker images1
- Fully managed (no installation/updates, servers to mai1
- PCI, SOC, ISO, HIPAA compliant1
- Full API/SDKs/CLI support1
- YAML based configuration1
- Great support (forums, premium support, SO, GitHub)1
- Perpetual free tier option (100 mins/month)1
- GitHub Enterprise support1
Pros of Bamboo
- Integrates with other Atlassian tools10
- Great notification scheme4
- Great UI2
- Has Deployment Projects1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodeBuild
- Poor branch support2
Cons of Bamboo
- Expensive6
- Low community support1
- Bad UI1
- Bad integration with docker1