Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodeBuild vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?
Introduction
When comparing AWS CodeBuild and SVN (Subversion), there are key differences that set them apart in terms of functionality and usage.
Hosting and Management: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service provided by Amazon Web Services, which doesn't require any servers to manage or update. On the other hand, SVN is a centralized version control system that needs to be hosted and managed on a server or local machine, requiring maintenance and updates to ensure its smooth operation.
Purpose: AWS CodeBuild is primarily used for automating the build process, including compiling, testing, and packaging code. It is designed to deliver quick and efficient build services for software projects. SVN, on the other hand, is a version control system focused on managing changes to files and directories over time, allowing multiple users to collaborate on a project.
Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodeBuild provides scalability and flexibility by allowing users to run multiple builds concurrently, supporting various build environments and configurations. SVN, while suitable for managing code changes in small to medium-sized projects, may face limitations in scalability due to its centralized architecture.
Continuous Integration/Deployment: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, making it a suitable choice for continuous integration and deployment pipelines. It can be easily integrated into existing CI/CD workflows. SVN, being a version control system, does not offer built-in support for continuous integration and deployment processes like AWS CodeBuild.
Branching and Merging: AWS CodeBuild focuses on automating the build process and does not directly handle branching and merging of code. SVN, as a version control system, provides robust support for branching and merging operations, enabling developers to work on different code versions simultaneously and merge changes efficiently.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the build duration and resources used. On the contrary, SVN is open-source software, making it a cost-effective choice for managing version control in software development projects.
In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and SVN serve different purposes in the software development lifecycle, with AWS CodeBuild excelling in automated build processes and scalability, while SVN focuses on version control and collaboration among developers.
SVN is much simpler than git for the simple stuff (checking in files and updating them when everyone's online), and much more complex than git for the complicated stuff (branching and merging). Or put another way, git's learning curve is steep up front, and then increases moderately as you do weird things; SVN's learning curve is very shallow up front and then increases rapidly.
If you're storing large files, if you're not branching, if you're not storing source code, and if your team is happy with SVN and the workflow you have, I'd say you should stay on SVN.
If you're writing source code with a relatively modern development practice (developers doing local builds and tests, pre-commit code reviews, preferably automated testing, preferably some amount of open-source code), you should move to git for two reasons: first, this style of working inherently requires frequent branching and merging, and second, your ability to interact with outside projects is easier if you're all comfortable with git instead of snapshotting the outside project into SVN.
Pros of AWS CodeBuild
- Pay per minute7
- Parameter Store integration for passing secrets5
- Integrated with AWS4
- Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch3
- Bit bucket integration3
- GitHub Webhooks support2
- AWS Config and Config rule integration for compliance2
- VPC PrivateLinks to invoke service without internet2
- Windows/.NET support1
- Jenkins plugin integration1
- Ondemand scaling of build jobs1
- Scheduled builds with CloudWatch Events integration1
- Local build debug support1
- Native support for accessing Amazon VPC resources1
- Docker based build environment1
- Support for bringing custom Docker images1
- Fully managed (no installation/updates, servers to mai1
- PCI, SOC, ISO, HIPAA compliant1
- Full API/SDKs/CLI support1
- YAML based configuration1
- Great support (forums, premium support, SO, GitHub)1
- Perpetual free tier option (100 mins/month)1
- GitHub Enterprise support1
Pros of SVN (Subversion)
- Easy to use20
- Simple code versioning13
- User/Access Management5
- Complicated code versionioning by Subversion3
- Free2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodeBuild
- Poor branch support2
Cons of SVN (Subversion)
- Branching and tagging use tons of disk space7
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is AWS CodeBuild?
What is SVN (Subversion)?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use SVN (Subversion)?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with AWS CodeBuild?
What tools integrate with SVN (Subversion)?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+7