AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub: What are the differences?
Developers describe AWS CodeCommit as "Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories". CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools. On the other hand, GitHub is detailed as "Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects". GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
AWS CodeCommit and GitHub can be primarily classified as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools.
Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:
- Access Control
On the other hand, GitHub provides the following key features:
- Command Instructions
- Source Browser
- Git Powered Wikis
"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Open source friendly" was stated as the key factor in picking GitHub.
reddit, Instacart, and Lyft are some of the popular companies that use GitHub, whereas AWS CodeCommit is used by iMedicare, Complete Business Online, and Sidecar Interactive. GitHub has a broader approval, being mentioned in 4647 company stacks & 5874 developers stacks; compared to AWS CodeCommit, which is listed in 24 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is AWS CodeCommit?
What is GitHub?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions