AWS CodeCommit vs Laravel Forge: What are the differences?
AWS CodeCommit: Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools; Laravel Forge: Painless PHP Servers by Laravel. Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.
AWS CodeCommit can be classified as a tool in the "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category, while Laravel Forge is grouped under "Deployment as a Service".
iMedicare, Complete Business Online, and Sidecar Interactive are some of the popular companies that use AWS CodeCommit, whereas Laravel Forge is used by Needful Co., LQDI Digital, and CartHook. AWS CodeCommit has a broader approval, being mentioned in 25 company stacks & 17 developers stacks; compared to Laravel Forge, which is listed in 29 company stacks and 11 developer stacks.
What is AWS CodeCommit?
What is Laravel Forge?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Laravel Forge?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Laravel Forge?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more consMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
The pull requests are only merged by FF what makes all the merges hard to manage. The IAM configuration is very awkward and the unavailability to add git hooks to prevent commits to be made into the server makes this tool not much usable for a software development company.
I use CodeCommit for projects that require a tighter integration with the AWS ecosystem.
Otherwise, my default source control system as a service of choice is: GitHub.