AWS CodePipeline vs Buildkite

Overview

Buildkite

Stacks210

Followers231

Votes115

AWS CodePipeline

Stacks551

Followers933

Votes30

AWS CodePipeline vs Buildkite: What are the differences?

AWS CodePipeline and Buildkite are two popular continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools used by developers to automate the software development process. Below are key differences between AWS CodePipeline and Buildkite:

Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodePipeline is tightly integrated with various AWS services, providing seamless integration with services such as AWS CodeBuild and AWS Elastic Beanstalk. In contrast, Buildkite is designed to be platform agnostic, allowing users to easily integrate with a wide range of third-party tools and services beyond the AWS ecosystem.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a consumption-based pricing model where users are charged based on the number of pipelines they run and the minutes it takes to execute those pipelines. On the other hand, Buildkite offers a transparent pricing model based on the number of concurrent jobs, with no charges for the number of pipelines or minutes executed.
Customization and Extensibility: Buildkite provides extensive customization and extensibility options through its rich plugin ecosystem, allowing users to tailor their CI/CD pipelines to their specific needs. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline offers limited customization options and relies more on integration with other AWS services for extending its functionality.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: Buildkite is known for its simplicity and ease of setup, enabling developers to get started with creating pipelines quickly and efficiently. AWS CodePipeline, being part of the AWS ecosystem, can have a steeper learning curve due to the complexity of managing AWS resources and configurations required for setting up pipelines.
Scalability: AWS CodePipeline is designed for scalability, allowing users to easily scale their pipelines based on the needs of their projects. Buildkite, while also scalable, may require additional configuration and setup to scale pipelines across a large number of concurrent jobs or complex workflows.
Community Support: Buildkite boasts a strong and active community of users and contributors who provide support, share best practices, and contribute to the development of plugins and integrations. On the other hand, AWS CodePipeline, being a proprietary AWS service, may have limited community support outside of official AWS documentation and support channels.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline offers seamless integration with AWS services and a consumption-based pricing model, while Buildkite provides extensive customization options, transparent pricing, and a strong community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Buildkite	AWS CodePipeline
CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.	CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.
Fast and stable builds; Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture; Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services; Powerful distributed build tools; Key/value targeting of agents; Dynamic job allocation allows adding and removing build machines; Shared key/value and binary artifact stores for easily distributing build jobs regardless of machine or network; Integration with pull requests, deployments and releases; GitHub, Github Enterprise, Bitbucket, Gitlab or your own SCM; Slack, Hipchat, Webhooks, and LIFX notifications; Extensible per-project with agent hooks, webhooks and the rest API; GitHub Enterprise is supported standard; SSO	Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Statistics
Stacks 210	Stacks 551
Followers 231	Followers 933
Votes 115	Votes 30
Pros & Cons
Pros 18 Great customer support 17 Github integration 16 Easy setup 16 Easy to use 12 Simplicity	Pros 13 Simple to set up 8 Managed service 4 GitHub integration 3 Parallel Execution 2 Automatic deployment Cons 2 No project boards 1 No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Integrations
Slack GitHub Docker GitLab Heroku HipChat Bitbucket Git GitHub Enterprise TestFlight	Runscope Amazon S3 GitHub Jenkins CloudBees BlazeMeter Ghost Inspector AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to Buildkite, AWS CodePipeline?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodePipeline vs Buildkite: What are the differences?

Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodePipeline is tightly integrated with various AWS services, providing seamless integration with services such as AWS CodeBuild and AWS Elastic Beanstalk. In contrast, Buildkite is designed to be platform agnostic, allowing users to easily integrate with a wide range of third-party tools and services beyond the AWS ecosystem.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a consumption-based pricing model where users are charged based on the number of pipelines they run and the minutes it takes to execute those pipelines. On the other hand, Buildkite offers a transparent pricing model based on the number of concurrent jobs, with no charges for the number of pipelines or minutes executed.
Customization and Extensibility: Buildkite provides extensive customization and extensibility options through its rich plugin ecosystem, allowing users to tailor their CI/CD pipelines to their specific needs. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline offers limited customization options and relies more on integration with other AWS services for extending its functionality.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: Buildkite is known for its simplicity and ease of setup, enabling developers to get started with creating pipelines quickly and efficiently. AWS CodePipeline, being part of the AWS ecosystem, can have a steeper learning curve due to the complexity of managing AWS resources and configurations required for setting up pipelines.
Scalability: AWS CodePipeline is designed for scalability, allowing users to easily scale their pipelines based on the needs of their projects. Buildkite, while also scalable, may require additional configuration and setup to scale pipelines across a large number of concurrent jobs or complex workflows.
Community Support: Buildkite boasts a strong and active community of users and contributors who provide support, share best practices, and contribute to the development of plugins and integrations. On the other hand, AWS CodePipeline, being a proprietary AWS service, may have limited community support outside of official AWS documentation and support channels.

AWS CodePipeline vs Buildkite

Overview