Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodePipeline vs Go.CD: What are the differences?
Introduction:
AWS CodePipeline and Go.CD are both continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools that help developers automate the software release process. While they share the common goal of improving development efficiency and software delivery, there are several key differences between the two.
Scalability and Cloud-native Approach: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which means it can easily scale based on demand and offers extensive integration with other AWS services. On the other hand, Go.CD is an open-source tool that can be hosted on-premises or on cloud platforms, providing more flexibility but requiring additional effort for scalability and maintenance.
Ecosystem and Integration: AWS CodePipeline has deep integrations with various AWS services, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeDeploy, making it seamless for developers who are already using AWS services. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, has a more extensive ecosystem that allows integration with a wide range of tools and plugins, providing developers with more customization options.
Pipeline Configuration and Flexibility: AWS CodePipeline offers a visual interface where developers can easily define and configure pipelines using a simple drag-and-drop mechanism, making it beginner-friendly and quick to set up. Go.CD, on the other hand, uses a declarative configuration file called "pipelines as code," allowing developers to define complex pipelines with more flexibility and version control.
Deployment Strategies: AWS CodePipeline provides various deployment strategies such as rolling updates, blue/green deployments, and canary deployments, which allow developers to choose the most suitable strategy for their application updates. Go.CD also supports a flexible deployment strategy, but it requires more manual configuration and customization.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where developers are billed based on the number of active pipelines and monthly active users. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, is free to use and does not have any additional costs associated with it. However, hosting Go.CD on cloud platforms or acquiring enterprise support may have associated costs.
Community and Support: AWS CodePipeline benefits from the extensive support and resources provided by AWS, including documentation, tutorials, and customer support. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, also has a dedicated community that provides support and contributes to its development, but the level of support may vary based on community activity and involvement.
In summary, AWS CodePipeline offers a scalable and cloud-native approach with deep integrations to other AWS services, while Go.CD provides greater flexibility in terms of hosting options and integrations with a wider range of tools. The choice between the two will depend on specific requirements, expertise, and preferences of the development team.
I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.
Google cloud build can help you. It is hosted on cloud and also provide reasonable free quota.
Pros of AWS CodePipeline
- Simple to set up13
- Managed service8
- GitHub integration4
- Parallel Execution3
- Automatic deployment2
- Manual Steps Available0
Pros of GoCD
- Open source31
- Pipeline dependencies27
- Pipeline structures25
- Can run jobs in parallel22
- Very flexible20
- Plugin architecture15
- Environments can keep config secure13
- Great UI12
- Good user roles and permissions10
- Supports many material dependencies9
- Fan-in, Fan-out7
- Designed for cd not just ci6
- Empowers product people to make delivery decisions4
- Flexible & easy deployment2
- Pass around artifacts2
- Build once1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodePipeline
- No project boards2
- No integration with "Power" 365 tools1
Cons of GoCD
- Lack of plugins2
- Horrible ui2
- No support1