Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Lambda

24K
18.6K
+ 1
432
AWS Step Functions

240
390
+ 1
31
Add tool

AWS Lambda vs AWS Step Functions: What are the differences?

# AWS Lambda vs AWS Step Functions

In this comparison, we will highlight key differences between AWS Lambda and AWS Step Functions.

1. **Execution Model**: AWS Lambda is a serverless computing service that allows you to run code without provisioning or managing servers. It is event-driven and operates on a per-request basis, executing functions in response to events. On the other hand, AWS Step Functions are a serverless orchestrator that enables you to coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. Step Functions allow you to define complex state machines with different states and transitions between them.

2. **Scalability**: AWS Lambda automatically scales based on the number of incoming requests, meaning it can handle a large volume of requests simultaneously without manual intervention. In contrast, AWS Step Functions are designed for orchestration and coordination of AWS services rather than handling high request volumes directly. Step Functions focus on managing the flow of execution between different service integrations.

3. **Use Cases**: AWS Lambda is commonly used for event-driven applications, real-time file processing, and background processing tasks. It is ideal for running small, individual functions in response to triggers. AWS Step Functions, on the other hand, are best suited for coordinating multiple AWS services in a workflow, handling long-running processes, state management, and error handling within complex applications.

4. **State Management**: AWS Lambda functions are stateless, meaning they do not maintain any state between invocations unless external services like databases are used to store state. In contrast, AWS Step Functions provide built-in state management capabilities, allowing you to track the state of a workflow, handle retries, and manage checkpoints within the workflow execution.

5. **Error Handling**: AWS Lambda provides basic error handling through retries and logging, requiring you to implement custom error handling logic within your function code. On the other hand, AWS Step Functions offer built-in error handling features, such as catching and retrying failed steps, defining catch handlers for different error types, and transitioning to specific states based on errors.

6. **Cost Structure**: AWS Lambda operates on a pay-per-use pricing model where you are charged based on the number of requests and the duration of code execution. In comparison, AWS Step Functions have a different pricing structure based on state transitions and state machine executions, with additional costs for API calls and data processing within workflows.

In Summary, AWS Lambda is ideal for executing individual functions in response to events, while AWS Step Functions excel at orchestrating complex workflows involving multiple AWS services and managing state transitions efficiently.
Decisions about AWS Lambda and AWS Step Functions
Tim Nolet

When adding a new feature to Checkly rearchitecting some older piece, I tend to pick Heroku for rolling it out. But not always, because sometimes I pick AWS Lambda . The short story:

  • Developer Experience trumps everything.
  • AWS Lambda is cheap. Up to a limit though. This impact not only your wallet.
  • If you need geographic spread, AWS is lonely at the top.
The setup

Recently, I was doing a brainstorm at a startup here in Berlin on the future of their infrastructure. They were ready to move on from their initial, almost 100% Ec2 + Chef based setup. Everything was on the table. But we crossed out a lot quite quickly:

  • Pure, uncut, self hosted Kubernetes โ€” way too much complexity
  • Managed Kubernetes in various flavors โ€” still too much complexity
  • Zeit โ€” Maybe, but no Docker support
  • Elastic Beanstalk โ€” Maybe, bit old but does the job
  • Heroku
  • Lambda

It became clear a mix of PaaS and FaaS was the way to go. What a surprise! That is exactly what I use for Checkly! But when do you pick which model?

I chopped that question up into the following categories:

  • Developer Experience / DX ๐Ÿค“
  • Ops Experience / OX ๐Ÿ‚ (?)
  • Cost ๐Ÿ’ต
  • Lock in ๐Ÿ”

Read the full post linked below for all details

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of AWS Lambda
Pros of AWS Step Functions
  • 129
    No infrastructure
  • 83
    Cheap
  • 70
    Quick
  • 59
    Stateless
  • 47
    No deploy, no server, great sleep
  • 12
    AWS Lambda went down taking many sites with it
  • 6
    Event Driven Governance
  • 6
    Extensive API
  • 6
    Auto scale and cost effective
  • 6
    Easy to deploy
  • 5
    VPC Support
  • 3
    Integrated with various AWS services
  • 7
    Integration with other services
  • 5
    Easily Accessible via AWS Console
  • 5
    Complex workflows
  • 5
    Pricing
  • 3
    Scalability
  • 3
    Workflow Processing
  • 3
    High Availability

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS Lambda
Cons of AWS Step Functions
  • 7
    Cant execute ruby or go
  • 3
    Compute time limited
  • 1
    Can't execute PHP w/o significant effort
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is AWS Lambda?

    AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

    What is AWS Step Functions?

    AWS Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the components of distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Building applications from individual components that each perform a discrete function lets you scale and change applications quickly.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use AWS Lambda?
    What companies use AWS Step Functions?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS Lambda?
    What tools integrate with AWS Step Functions?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubPythonNode.js+47
    55
    72767
    GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
    12
    6608
    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    22144
    What are some alternatives to AWS Lambda and AWS Step Functions?
    Serverless
    Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.
    Azure Functions
    Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
    Google App Engine
    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
    AWS Batch
    It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.
    See all alternatives